Hanoi Jane's Brother needs to be caged in a zoo..

hollywood idiocy aside, what's more offensive, putting kids in cages or calling for someone's kid to be put in a cage?

hollywood idiocy aside, what's more offensive, putting kids in cages or calling for someone's kid to be put in a cage? Originally Posted by darkwader

more offensive, per your question? putting kids in cages.

more offensive when you factor in kidnapping and residency with Pedophiles? calling for someone's kid to be put in a cage.

Jesus what would you guys say if Hunter S. Thompson was around today. He said crazy shit that was ten times worse about Nixon and his family. Not to mention probably every other administration going forward from there including Ford, Clinton, Ronnie R, and both Bush’s.

And those of you still clinging to that Hanoi Jane thing. If you look beyond the “media induced hype of the Nixon machine” you will learn that she never turned over any names or information of the POWs. This according to and confirmed by the same POWs that they say she turned on. She was actually one of the few people with a voice that was actually putting her ass on the line and risking a big career to speak out against that unjust and bullshit war and standing up for the thousands of our young men that were being drafted and sent over there to fight and die for nothing.

I recommend you listen to the recent Howard Stern interview with her from a few months ago. It might open your eyes a little bit about what was really going on back then.

Jesus what would you guys say if Hunter S. Thompson was around today. He said crazy shit that was ten times worse about Nixon and his family. Not to mention probably every other administration going forward from there including Ford, Clinton, Ronnie R, and both Bush’s.

And those of you still clinging to that Hanoi Jane thing. If you look beyond the “media induced hype of the Nixon machine” you will learn that she never turned over any names or information of the POWs. This according to and confirmed by the same POWs that they say she turned on. She was actually one of the few people with a voice that was actually putting her ass on the line and risking a big career to speak out against that unjust and bullshit war and standing up for the thousands of our young men that were being drafted and sent over there to fight and die for nothing.

I recommend you listen to the recent Howard Stern interview with her from a few months ago. It might open your eyes a little bit about what was really going on back then. Originally Posted by Hank3fan

Why let hatred and ignorance get in the way of political idiocy.

The pictures that started this uproar were taken during the Obama administration. This not new, only more publicized. Families able to prove they are family are not split apart.

If I want to take a child to Mexico just the two of us I must have documented prove that the mother knows and is ok with it. No note, No go! CPS does this same stuff everyday in every situation it is better to err in the favor of a child’s safety!

Child trafficking is so wide spread that its our responsibility to Make sure adults traveling with children have verifiable proof they are who they say the are. It’s a horrible thing to do but the other option is an unacceptable risk.

What would be more damaging to a child, being separated and kept safe.
Or That CHILD being sold into slavery or worse sexual slavery!

I hate to say it but maybe the U.N. Could get involved in coordination with the Red Cross to care for these children.

WOW.
So Dfwclub you think that the people coming from the other direction have the same access to the verification process that you do?

Well why don’t we just go round up all children and put their respective guardians thru a vetting process including your children. Because you know child trafficking is so rampant. And let’s see how they react to an institutional living arrangement even if just for the weekend. Which I guarantee it will be longer than that because the wheels of Justice don’t move that fast.

What would be more damaging the one child kept safe vs. the hundreds or thousands taken away from their families and lost in a system for god knows how long? You obviously have never been in an institutional facility for any amount of time.

The people that are trafficking children are not coming in this way. They have their subterfuge that works for them just like the drug traffickers.

You know that these kids (minors at any age even as young as 3 or 4 years old) can be sent before a judge without any parental or legal representation and deported back to their country of origin where especially in the case of the third world countries we are talking about, child slavery and exploitation are a 1000 times worse at the hands of the gangs and “warlords” than they ever could be here. And with their parents awaiting their own day in front of a judge who do you think they are going to be picked up by when they get “home”.

Way to think it through.

it is better to err in the favor of a child’s safety!

Child trafficking is so wide spread that its our responsibility to Make sure adults traveling with children have verifiable proof they are who they say the are. It’s a horrible thing to do but the other option is an unacceptable risk. Originally Posted by Dfwclubgoer2

Well why don’t we just go round up all children and put their respective guardians thru a vetting process including your children. Because you know child trafficking is so rampant. Originally Posted by Hank3fan

I don't think it's difficult to figure out which one of these messages I side with

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2367286