Obama / Bush - no difference

Huge differences. Bush put in enough troops to get the job done and they knew what the job was. Bush told the American people straight up what he was doing and why. Bush didn't try to avoid answering questions or shucking responsibility for his orders.

Yes. You are correct, sir. No significant nor substantive difference. The apparent differences are cosmetic only. At their core, both parties want an ever increasing control over the lives of the American people. Good point, LL. Thanks for the opportunity to clarify. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Please don't take my post as an acceptance of your conclusion, because I significantly disagree with the conclusion that there is no "significant" difference.

I was addressing your all encompassing conclusion by asking ....

"Would you at least say .... "No significant difference"?"

In some respects Obaminable has accepted what are labeled as "Bush Policies" internationally, and has taken credit for the completion of tasks initiated by Bush, but not finished along the lines of the Bush Goal or Plan.

I suspect that as factually oriented historians (as opposed to re-writers of history) start publishing their works the "legacy" of Bush will look more Pro-United States than Obaminable and more clearly defined as having been consistent with the facts known at the time ... as being a consistent policy throughout his eight years with greater respect for the processes of our republic than Obaminable. I also suspect that his "legacy" will include the correct assumption underlying his decision making that in the first year of his presidency he faced the greatest crisis with respect to a direct attack on the continental U.S. (at least since Peal Harbor if one desires to include it) and implemented decisions to effectively stop a second wave of an attack, which is now being disclosed and discussed by the intelligence community at length, because a band of dumbass liberals decided to release an incomplete report for their own self-interests, as opposed to those of the United States.

The Patriot Act, unwarranted NSA spying, etc. are not "pro-American".

Yes. You are correct, sir. No significant nor substantive difference. The apparent differences are cosmetic only. At their core, both parties want an ever increasing control over the lives of the American people. Good point, LL. Thanks for the opportunity to clarify. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I gotta agree with CutiePie on this one.

The Patriot Act, unwarranted NSA spying, etc. are not "pro-American". Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

They are "PRO-United States of America" ....

.. or did you think it was Pro-Russian? Pro-Muslim? Pro-Terrorist?

They are "PRO-United States of America" ....

.. or did you think it was Pro-Russian? Pro-Muslim? Pro-Terrorist? Originally Posted by LexusLover

I thought they were pro- prophylactic designed to fuck us.

I thought they were pro- prophylactic designed to fuck us. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

I'll even give you credit for this imaginative and creative comment after your Wright Brothers attack.

after your Wright Brothers attack. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Think you were the one on attack mode, better regroup.

There you go trying to think again. Leave that to the professionals.

I thought they were pro- prophylactic designed to fuck us. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Are you a terrorist? If so, and "us" includes you, then YES!

Think you were the one on attack mode, better regroup. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Just because you run into a wall, ...

................doesn't mean the wall is attacking you.

There you go trying to think again. Leave that to the professionals. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Are you a terrorist? If so, and "us" includes you, then YES! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Just because you run into a wall, ...

................doesn't mean the wall is attacking you. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Talk about two non thinkers and dumb and dumber show up. Nice try girls.

Just because you run into a wall, ...

................doesn't mean the wall is attacking you. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Again, I repeat for Eva ... aka Iva-Little-One.

I you couldn't post "Smilies" you would be "speechless" .... as in "dumb"!

... your posts already have no substance, even with them.

Again, I repeat for Eva ... aka Iva-Little-One.

I you couldn't post "Smilies" you would be "speechless" .... as in "dumb"!

... your posts already have no substance, even with them. Originally Posted by LexusLover

If you were able to write a coherent sentence you would not look like a fool.However it doesn't seem to bother you. Like I you couldn't LMAO .

If you were able to write a coherent sentence you would not look like a fool.However it doesn't seem to bother you. Like I you couldn't LMAO . Originally Posted by i'va biggen

It's like those "walls" you keep hitting .... just because you cannot comprehend what someone writes doesn't mean they can't write "coherently" ....

.. but I'm encouraged that all you have to complain about is sentence structure.

Now if your teachers can get you beyond the Big Chief tablet stage ....

.... things will start looking up for you. Smilies will be a thing of the past.

Shouldn't you be in Sunday School Class right now?