Tom Steyer, typical libtard hypocrite.,

Steyer is annoying because he's super sanctimonious. He's also a hypocrite. Here's a somewhat biased but true description of why:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...nge-hypocrite/

So apparently he's going to spend $100 million on his presidential campaign and has very little chance of even making the debates? That's hubris. While I incorrectly thought Trump had little chance of winning in 2016, the $66 million he invested in his campaign would have been worth the money to improve the Trump brand, even if he'd lost.

Steyer is annoying because he's super sanctimonious. He's also a hypocrite. Here's a somewhat biased but true description of why:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...nge-hypocrite/

So apparently he's going to spend $100 million on his presidential campaign and has very little chance of even making the debates? That's hubris. While I incorrectly thought Trump had little chance of winning in 2016, the $66 million he invested in his campaign would have been worth the money to improve the Trump brand, even if he'd lost. Originally Posted by Tiny

I agree.

Steyer is annoying because he's super sanctimonious. He's also a hypocrite. Here's a somewhat biased but true description of why:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...nge-hypocrite/

So apparently he's going to spend $100 million on his presidential campaign and has very little chance of even making the debates? That's hubris. While I incorrectly thought Trump had little chance of winning in 2016, the $66 million he invested in his campaign would have been worth the money to improve the Trump brand, even if he'd lost. Originally Posted by Tiny

I agree. Originally Posted by bambino

+2



he's beating a dead horse on climate change.