5 witnesses why did the white house prevent the fbi talking to all of the I belive they left over 28 never interviewed that is nota complete investigation by a long shot Originally Posted by skirtchaser79411After three months of investigations with Team Ford, Ramirez, Swetnick, etc., giving them names, why couldn't the New York Post, The New York Times, The Washington Post, etc., produce anyone that could corroborate any of the allegations made by the accusers? Not a single one!?!?!
it was not complete and ran by the white house Originally Posted by skirtchaser79411Over the course of several weeks the New York Post, The New York Times, The Washington Post, etc., ran their own investigations and found nothing ... nada ... zilch. Those investigations weren't controlled by the White House.
I am not satisfied with the fbi but you should have let them have full reign to complete the investigaion Originally Posted by skirtchaser79411Seven FBI investigations and untold lame-stream media investigation with no constraints produced nothing but a dozen or so witnesses who claimed that the accusers' version of events never happened ... nothing ... nada ... zilch: Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick lied.
You keep saying that, IBH.The lame-stream media is the other side. After they spent days investigating, they reported that no one corroborated the allegations made by Ford or the other accusers.
Obviously, you’re trying to convince yourself that the repeated evil actions of your leaders is somehow morally aligned with the “values” you have always espoused.
Sounds like the right is constantly trying to reconcile its reprehensible and hypocritical behavior.
Try listening to the other side for a change. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
After three months of investigations with Team Ford, Ramirez, Swetnick, etc., giving them names, why couldn't the New York Post, The New York Times, The Washington Post, etc., produce anyone that could corroborate any of the allegations made by the accusers? Not a single one!?!?! Originally Posted by I B HankeringThat has no bearing on whether anyone lied, or not.
That has no bearing on whether anyone lied, or not. Originally Posted by RetiredSubmarinerYeah, it does. Every witness denied Ford's account. That Ford persisted in her story not only in the absence of corroboration but in the face of contrary sworn testimony supplied by other witnesses refuting her claims that Kavanaugh assaulted her means Ford lied.
Yeah, it does. Every witness denied Ford's account. That Ford persisted in her story not only in the absence of corroboration but in the face of contrary sworn testimony supplied by other witnesses refuting her claims that Kavanaugh assaulted her means Ford lied. Originally Posted by I B HankeringCorroboration may cause you to feel like something has been proven, but that does not prove anything.