the liquidation of Alex Jones

You don't have to go the far left websites. You can just turn on cnn or any lame stream media. Or listen to Adam Schiff and his comrades. Originally Posted by Budman

The far right websites do a great job of in depth conspiracy theories....without any facts.

Return to the original topic - The Liquidation of Alex Jones.

#13 - Our moderating staff monitors the forums with the goal of keeping threads on track and on topic. Occasionally we may issue specific instructions or direction to a poster and we ask that you respect those instructions and follow them. Disregarding a moderator's written instruction or repeating a violation for which you have been warned will most certainly result in penalty.

Not "they". You can follow the liquidation in the court rulings Originally Posted by VitaMan

Alex Jones didn't have to go along with the Narrative. Just because he thinks it was a hoax doesn't mean he has to pay people because they were offended. It's not defamation on anyone's character anyway. So what if he doesn't believe it, he doesn't have too. His First Amendment rights allow him to question it. He'll stall this judgement until he's ninety and Infowars will continue until Alex gets tired of it.

What the fuck is wrong with some of you people who are passively defending this asshole? Do any of you have any children? If so, imagine dropping your kid off at school on the way to work and getting a call later that your precious child has been murdered. And then when you are losing your mind with sorrow, some asshole is calling your pain and tears bullshit to his retarded listeners for ratings and for his financial gain.

On top of that, you just buried your child and you only wished with everything inside you that it really was a just a hoax as he claimed, and it was all just a bad dream, yet you know your child is not in his or her room but buried in a fucking grave. And I haven't even mentioned the deceased/murdered adults and their loved ones.

It is a shame to me that motherfucker gets to keep even a damn penny from his lies. Fortunately for him by law, they can only liquidate so many of his assets and not all of them to pay his debt to the claimants. Unfortunately, he will still have a loyal following of nut job retards and he will remain a multimillionaire despite what he owes those he affected with his thoughtless and heinous words.

Having to liquidate all his personal assets to pay his judgement for spreading false conspiracy theories.
Originally Posted by VitaMan

Can't something be done about The History Channell's "Ancient Aleans" show?

OK, now I have read a few more posts in tid thread. It is disturbing to see how many contributors here believe that someone should be sanctioned for posting something that others do not think is true.

Aside from relative anonymity, one of the reasons I post here is that in the past, I felt that my opinion, however counter to the mainstream narrative, would be posted.

I am appalled that ther seems to be a movement here to "liquidate" posters who publish their thoughts that seem contrary to the beliefs of others.

We can argue the merits of a policy or its implementation, and we can shine the light of reason onto wild tails of this or that cabsl . . . but removing someone becasuse they do not conform is repugnant.

OK, now I have read a few more posts in tid thread. It is disturbing to see how many contributors here believe that someone should be sanctioned for posting something that others do not think is true.

Aside from relative anonymity, one of the reasons I post here is that in the past, I felt that my opinion, however counter to the mainstream narrative, would be posted.

I am appalled that ther seems to be a movement here to "liquidate" posters who publish their thoughts that seem contrary to the beliefs of others.

We can argue the merits of a policy or its implementation, and we can shine the light of reason onto wild tails of this or that cabsl . . . but removing someone becasuse they do not conform is repugnant. Originally Posted by ICU 812

Man, what are you even rambling on about? Do you even know what the topic is? The topic is about liquidating an asshole's tangible assets and turning them into cash to pay off his judgment.

Please explain to me how the fuck you liquidate a handle on a whore board in that same context. Stop your whining about vastly different views about that scumbag Jones until you can articulate it properly. Now my head hurts. LOL

Alex Jones didn't have to go along with the Narrative. Just because he thinks it was a hoax doesn't mean he has to pay people because they were offended. It's not defamation on anyone's character anyway. So what if he doesn't believe it, he doesn't have too. His First Amendment rights allow him to question it. He'll stall this judgement until he's ninety and Infowars will continue until Alex gets tired of it. Originally Posted by Levianon17

There is no stalling. Alex Jones will be able to keep some of his assets under bankruptcy laws. The rest will be liquidated.


There is a First Amendment. There are also laws pertaining to defamation, slander and libel, which is what Alex Jones has made his living off of.


Jones was convicted by default of defaming the families by accusing them of faking their children's deaths, being crisis actors, and fraudulently misrepresenting themselves to the public at large. The verdict determined Jones harmed the families by spreading lies about them to his InfoWars website and program audience, and to the public.

Alex Jones is a right wing provocateur.


The fact that he did this in an instance where children were murdered makes him the lowest of the lowest scum.

Sorry all, I did not read deeply into the thread.

Thanks for the corrections.

There is no stalling. Alex Jones will be able to keep some of his assets under bankruptcy laws. The rest will be liquidated.


There is a First Amendment. There are also laws pertaining to defamation, slander and libel, which is what Alex Jones has made his living off of.


Jones was convicted by default of defaming the families by accusing them of faking their children's deaths, being crisis actors, and fraudulently misrepresenting themselves to the public at large. The verdict determined Jones harmed the families by spreading lies about them to his InfoWars website and program audience, and to the public.

Alex Jones is a right wing provocateur.


The fact that he did this in an instance where children were murdered makes him the lowest of the lowest scum. Originally Posted by VitaMan

Why is Alex Jones the only one being targeted? He was not the only one proclaiming the Sandy Hook incident was a hoax. Besides if he was passing misinformation publicly in 2012 when the incident took place why did they wait over a decade to file a defamation law suit against him? I believe the State of Connecticut has a two year Statute of Limitations on Defamation suits. There's not much life to this case.

Why is Alex Jones the only one being targeted? He was not the only one proclaiming the Sandy Hook incident was a hoax. Besides if he was passing misinformation publicly in 2012 when the incident took place why did they wait over a decade to file a defamation law suit against him? I believe the State of Connecticut has a two year Statute of Limitations on Defamation suits. There's not much life to this case. Originally Posted by Levianon17

The defamation cases, there were multiple instances, were filed in Texas in 2018. I think they got around the statute of limitations issue because that dumb ass kept repeating the same conspiracy nonsense over and over again. The cases were stalled multiple times over the years because requests for dismissal were filed and had to be ruled on as well as the failure to turn over subpoenad evidence to the court. Eventually he was found guilty. Some times justice takes time.

The defamation cases, there were multiple instances, were filed in Texas in 2018. I think they got around the statute of limitations issue because that dumb ass kept repeating the same conspiracy nonsense over and over again. The cases were stalled multiple times over the years because requests for dismissal were filed and had to be ruled on as well as the failure to turn over subpoenad evidence to the court. Eventually he was found guilty. Some times justice takes time. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Sandy Hook took place in 2012. If anything was filed in 2018 that's still past the Statute of Limitations. There will be other motions for dismissal.

Sandy Hook took place in 2012. If anything was filed in 2018 that's still past the Statute of Limitations. There will be other motions for dismissal. Originally Posted by Levianon17

Defamation doesn’t originate from the event being lied about. It originates from the time the defamation occurs. If Alex Jones had stopped lying about Sandy Hook back in 2013 or 2014 there wouldn’t have been a defamation case to begin with.

Why anyone wants to defend Alex Jones in this situation is beyond me.


The judgment is completed. Personal bankruptcy has been filed.


It is also beyond me why posters are still saying there will be motions for dismissal. The case is completed. Only the collection of the assets for disposal is left to be done.

Why anyone wants to defend Alex Jones in this situation is beyond me.

The judgment is completed. Personal bankruptcy has been filed.

It is also beyond me why posters are still saying there will be motions for dismissal. The case is completed. Only the collection of the assets for disposal is left to be done. Originally Posted by VitaMan

Some people like to believe that the 1st amendment allows them to say whatever they want as often as they want without repercussions or consequences. When such repercussions occur they call it, rigged, politically motivated, targeted, unconstitutional, etc, etc…. (remind you of anyone in particular)

The 1st amendment is a powerful right but it does have its limitations. If you lie often enough eventually karma comes due.