A Trumptard’s Pledge

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
The ONLY reason we were able to get our great USMCA Trade Deal approved was because the Do Nothing Democrats wanted to show that they could approve something productive in light of the fact that all they even think about is impeachment. She knows nothing about the USMCA Deal!

50.5K
7:25 AM - Dec 24, 2019

You got it wrong, HedRot! All yous and Trump think abouts is impeachment. And flagellating your pathetic little limp levers

You got it wrong, HedRot! All yous and Trump think abouts is impeachment. And flagellating your pathetic little limp levers Originally Posted by HoeHummer

LOLLING you HedRot!

Found your dreams bungalow in Mexico yet?

LOLLING you HedRot!

Found your dreams bungalow in Mexico yet? Originally Posted by HoeHummer

What the fuck does that means, HedRot? You moving into a cave when Trumpism is eradicated from the Western Hemispheres?

The DEEP WORLD is bents on you destruction, and I suggest you’d let that one marinate!

What the fuck does that means, HedRot? You moving into a cave when Trumpism is eradicated from the Western Hemispheres?

The DEEP WORLD is bents on you destruction, and I suggest you’d let that one marinate! Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Who can't Love a Poor boy, YRSE?

LOLLING you, you Rope pissing Nancy!

Why don’t you posts that in IFFY’s music threads? I’m sure he’ll gladly suck your Babcock If he could, poor fella

StanH says:

December 24, 2019 at 8:50 am
It twas the night before Christmas and all through the swamp not a creature was scurrying they were all afraid of Trump; the ropes were all hung on the gallows with care in hopes that certain coup conspirators would soon be there. Free Americans all tucked in their beds with visions of subversives, maybe it’s best left unsaid; Melania in her kerchief and President Trump in his (MAGA) hat settled in for his normal 2 to 4 hour nap; when out on the lawn they’re came such a clatter our Great President Trump had to see what was the matter. Away to the window he flew like a flash, tore open the shutters and threw up the sash. The moon shined brightly on a new fallen snow, gave a luster of midday to the objects below, and what did appear, but an army of Deplorables, “Darling we have nothing to fear.” A cauldron of tar all boiling and hot, the feathers were blowing and the rails were stacked on the spot. When off in the distance what did he hear, on Nancy, on Adam, on Jerry and Brennan, on Comey on Valerie, Loretta and Hillary… you can make up the rest. Originally Posted by Redhot1960

followed by the chorus sounds of Oink!, Oink!, Oink! (instead of hoe!, hoe!, hoe!!!)

Sorry, a bit of gallows humor.

KAG! …by having a Merry Christmas it will certainly anger the liberals in your life.

merry christmas

You thinks Melania is gonna give her asshole a hummer for Xmas?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/18/o...hment-fbi.html

‘The most heinous act in which a democratic government can engage is to use its law enforcement machinery for political ends.’

Several years ago, Laurence Silberman, a senior judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and a man widely admired by conservatives for his wisdom and rectitude, spoke of his experience in the mid-1970s looking into the secret files of F.B.I. Director J. Edgar Hoover.

“Accompanied by only one F.B.I. official, I read virtually all these files in three weekends,” Silberman, who was then President Gerald Ford’s deputy attorney general,recalled in a speech to a judicial conference.“It was the single worst experience of my long governmental service.”

He continued:

“I intend to take to my grave nasty bits of information on various political figures — some still active. As bad as the dirt collection business was, perhaps even worse was the evidence that [Hoover] had allowed — even offered — the bureau to be used by presidents for nakedly political purposes.I have always thought that the most heinous act in which a democratic government can engage is to use its law enforcement machinery for political ends.”(My emphasis.)

I’ve been thinking about Silberman’s speech in two connections this week, the first regarding the F.B.I., the second impeachment. They are related.

On Tuesday, Rosemary Collyer, presiding judge on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, issued astinging rebuketo the Bureau for its handling of the counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign’s Russia ties.

“The frequency with which representations made by F.B.I. personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other F.B.I. applications is reliable,” Collyer wrote.

Collyer’s decision should put paid to the notion thatthis month’sreport from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s inspector general, is some kind of ringing vindication of the Russia investigation. Republicans like Devin Nunes were more right about the conduct of the investigation than many of its supporters,including me, care to admit, even if the investigation itself was warranted. And Carter Page is owed an apology by anyone, including me, who cares for the presumption of innocence and objects to trial by media.

But now to impeachment: If conservatives are right to object to the abuse of power by F.B.I. agents, shouldn’t they be far more alarmed at the abuse of investigatory and other powers for political ends by the president of the United States?

According to the public transcript of Donald Trump’s July 25 call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, Trump said: “The server, they say Ukraine has it …. I would like to have the attorney general call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it.”

Trump also said: “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great.”

Here is a textbook case of Judge Silberman’s “most heinous act in which a democratic government can engage.” The president is unambiguously proposing to employ his chief law-enforcement officer to investigate a debunked conspiracy theory that Trump hopes will burnish his political legitimacy. And he also proposes to use the attorney general in an attempt to investigate a political opponent for undeniably political ends.

That Trump didn’t get away with it is a relief, not an exoneration. That he continues to insist the call was “perfect,” as he did Tuesday in his letter to Nancy Pelosi, means that he is likely to do it again. That he attempted to subvert the will of Congress by impounding congressional funds for his political ends threatens the separation of powers in ways that will haunt a future Republican Congress. That he was prepared to endanger an ally and benefit an enemy is not treason, as the Constitution defines treason, but it is a travesty, as any American ought to understand travesty. That Republican leaders are cheering him only serves to define deviancy down and debase our political norms. That conservative pundits claim to be outraged at the F.B.I.’s investigation of the Trump campaign — or the smearing of Carter Page — while being indifferent to Trump’s attempt to investigate Joe Biden — and the smearing of Hunter Biden — marks a fresh low in rhetorical sophistry.

There are people who believe that law, morality, traditions and institutions are at least as important to the preservation of freedom as the will of the people. Such people are called conservative. What Republicans are now doing with their lock step opposition to impeachment — and with their indifference to the behavior that brought impeachment about — is not conservative. It is the abdication of principle to power.

I might think differently about impeachment if Trump had shown any sense of contrition. Or if Republicans had shown any inclination to censure him. But Trump hasn’t, and they haven’t. Whatever the political ramifications of impeachment now, history will judge members of this Congress harshly if they fail to state their revulsion at the president’s behavior in the strongest terms they can. Impeach and convict.

The Case for Impeachment is a non-fiction book by American University Distinguished Professor of History Allan Lichtman arguing for the impeachment of Donald Trump. It was published on April 18, 2017, by Dey Street Books, an imprint of HarperCollins.

Originally Posted by Redhot1960

The Conservative Case for Impeachment — and Removal

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/18/o...hment-fbi.html

‘The most heinous act in which a democratic government can engage is to use its law enforcement machinery for political ends.’

Several years ago, Laurence Silberman, a senior judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and a man widely admired by conservatives for his wisdom and rectitude, spoke of his experience in the mid-1970s looking into the secret files of F.B.I. Director J. Edgar Hoover.

“Accompanied by only one F.B.I. official, I read virtually all these files in three weekends,” Silberman, who was then President Gerald Ford’s deputy attorney general,recalled in a speech to a judicial conference.“It was the single worst experience of my long governmental service.”

He continued:

“I intend to take to my grave nasty bits of information on various political figures — some still active. As bad as the dirt collection business was, perhaps even worse was the evidence that [Hoover] had allowed — even offered — the bureau to be used by presidents for nakedly political purposes.I have always thought that the most heinous act in which a democratic government can engage is to use its law enforcement machinery for political ends.”(My emphasis.)

I’ve been thinking about Silberman’s speech in two connections this week, the first regarding the F.B.I., the second impeachment. They are related.

On Tuesday, Rosemary Collyer, presiding judge on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, issued astinging rebuketo the Bureau for its handling of the counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign’s Russia ties.

“The frequency with which representations made by F.B.I. personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other F.B.I. applications is reliable,” Collyer wrote.

Collyer’s decision should put paid to the notion thatthis month’sreport from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s inspector general, is some kind of ringing vindication of the Russia investigation. Republicans like Devin Nunes were more right about the conduct of the investigation than many of its supporters,including me, care to admit, even if the investigation itself was warranted. And Carter Page is owed an apology by anyone, including me, who cares for the presumption of innocence and objects to trial by media.

But now to impeachment: If conservatives are right to object to the abuse of power by F.B.I. agents, shouldn’t they be far more alarmed at the abuse of investigatory and other powers for political ends by the president of the United States?

According to the public transcript of Donald Trump’s July 25 call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, Trump said: “The server, they say Ukraine has it …. I would like to have the attorney general call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it.”

Trump also said: “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great.”

Here is a textbook case of Judge Silberman’s “most heinous act in which a democratic government can engage.” The president is unambiguously proposing to employ his chief law-enforcement officer to investigate a debunked conspiracy theory that Trump hopes will burnish his political legitimacy. And he also proposes to use the attorney general in an attempt to investigate a political opponent for undeniably political ends.

That Trump didn’t get away with it is a relief, not an exoneration. That he continues to insist the call was “perfect,” as he did Tuesday in his letter to Nancy Pelosi, means that he is likely to do it again. That he attempted to subvert the will of Congress by impounding congressional funds for his political ends threatens the separation of powers in ways that will haunt a future Republican Congress. That he was prepared to endanger an ally and benefit an enemy is not treason, as the Constitution defines treason, but it is a travesty, as any American ought to understand travesty. That Republican leaders are cheering him only serves to define deviancy down and debase our political norms. That conservative pundits claim to be outraged at the F.B.I.’s investigation of the Trump campaign — or the smearing of Carter Page — while being indifferent to Trump’s attempt to investigate Joe Biden — and the smearing of Hunter Biden — marks a fresh low in rhetorical sophistry.

There are people who believe that law, morality, traditions and institutions are at least as important to the preservation of freedom as the will of the people. Such people are called conservative. What Republicans are now doing with their lock step opposition to impeachment — and with their indifference to the behavior that brought impeachment about — is not conservative. It is the abdication of principle to power.

I might think differently about impeachment if Trump had shown any sense of contrition. Or if Republicans had shown any inclination to censure him. But Trump hasn’t, and they haven’t. Whatever the political ramifications of impeachment now, history will judge members of this Congress harshly if they fail to state their revulsion at the president’s behavior in the strongest terms they can. Impeach and convict. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

It's a blatant lie to claim that the story regarding the Ukrainian effort to thwart Trump's election has been 'debunked'. Only liars claim it has been 'debunked'. Only very ignorant fools believe congenital liars.