How "Low" is "Low Volume"

Any Volume is Low enough when a client is unaware that the provider is seeing anyone other than him.
If she can maintain that illusion banging 10 guys a day good for her..... Originally Posted by Whispers

Of course she is seeing other guys. Do you mean seeing anyone else the same day? Within the hour? Plus, guys talk...which is how you end up finding out that you got bumped by, or bumped one of your buddies.

With me, it is a mental picture factor... So I love to DATY, which if I suspect there was someone else's rubberized equipment present shortly before my arrival, it is game over for me. Hehe, suprisingly it doesn't bother me if there is someone after me.

Emotionally then, in terms of the IoP (Illusion of Passion) factor, when I book an appointment with a girl or have a standing appointment on a particular day of the week, I may spend the whole day, maybe even several days looking forward to the date. I really do... So, as far as the GFE or IoP experience goes, if she is low volume enough to make me believe that she was looking forward to the date, meaning she didn't JUST get done with someone else, that preserves the GFE experience.

To me, a "low volume" provider is someone that does this part time. Again, by definition, if you are a full time provider, that is not low volume. It may be low volume only to the extent you are not getting the business you want. So, when someone advertises as being "low volume," to me that almost means, I am dying out here, I want more business! I guess it could mean she lost a couple of regulars and is conducting auditions.

So, for my preference, a TRUE low volume girl has no more than one appontment in a day, and perhaps about 3x a week if she has a real world job as well. At least until the illusion wears off....

What Ztonk said lol.

I also think it's funny when a gal emphasizes that she is low volume but she'll get 5 reviews in a week. Those are just the guys reviewing not counting the others that don't review. That kind of defeats the purpose I think.

What Ztonk said lol.

I also think it's funny when a gal emphasizes that she is low volume but she'll get 5 reviews in a week. Those are just the guys reviewing not counting the others that don't review. That kind of defeats the purpose I think. Originally Posted by Paven

I guess its possible if "low volume" = 1 per day, and the reviews are of different days... yeah, i know, unlikely. kinda shatters the illusion. so why pretend? I don't think any of my favorites actually claim to be "low volume". It's just an assumption I make in some cases where I choose to WANT TO believe... again the illusion. Maybe in some cases, it is the opposite? The girl in fact is very low volume, but would like guys to think she is a lot more popular?

Once a day is 60 grand a year at 250/session with 2 days off a week. IF they manage their money, they could be what I consider to be low volume ie. 2-3 day, and her door isn't a revolving one. But I'm with kboy... The illusion of GFE is what I'm after. If I text her the day of the appointment and she responds back with my name/handle then fantastic. If it's more akin to yes mr. 2:45, lookin forwards to it. well poodoo.

This game is 90% perception IMO. As in civvie life people tend to prefer to hear what they want to hear, and believe what we want to believe, then not much difference other than I get laid. Always a good thing.

Once a day is 60 grand a year at 250/session with 2 days off a week. IF they manage their money, they could be what I consider to be low volume ie. 2-3 day, and her door isn't a revolving one. . Originally Posted by budman33

tax free too!! so really $60k a year cash is like $80k a year salary,, not to shabby

less than 3 a day and no more than a dozen a week. Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou

hmmmmm.... So banging 50 guys or so a month... 600 a year..... is how you would prefer guys look at you as "Low Volume"?

I'm sorry..... personally.... If I decide to see a lady..... if I know or think it's more than a couple a week then that is way too much volume for me.... I'm gonna want to know a lot more about someone and where the money is going before I spend any on her...

but i think low volume is just a marketing term. Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou

I doubt many would disagree with that.

some girls just use it to assure you that you won't see some guy being rushed out as you make you way in, but I hardly believe when a girl says she is low volume unless she is UTR.

But honestly it shouldn't matter what volume you are providing services as long as you are doing your job right (spacing enough time between appointments, being fresh for every date, being organized with your schedule) Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou

Unless of course there is a problematic need for all the cash being generated....

I just realized after you quoted me that I said "day" when i actually meant "less that 3 a week".

Anything is going to be more high volume than a regular civilian womans body count (and civvies almost always lie about their numbers lol). But low volume is more about casting a veil of exclusivity, which of course attracts guys because the last thing you want to be thinking about is who, how long ago and how many dicks have been in her before yours.

I usually only see about 2 or 3 at the most during the week but I hate to use terms such as Low Volume or Exclusive or other titles such as those.

I just realized after you quoted me that I said "day" when i actually meant "less that 3 a week". Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou

Understandable..... 3 a week/12 a month puts you in a very reasonale niche for being considered low volume.....

3 a day and 12 a week?.... that's what caught my eye....

I don't consider 600 a year low volume at all.. I have ladies that have worked with me for years and still have not reached 600 a year, you got the numbers all wrong guys, most ladies don't even work 5 days a week, try 2-3

Low volume would be a regular bar slut.....

3 a day and 12 a week?.... that's what caught my eye.... Originally Posted by Whispers

Yeah that was my mistake. I don't know what I was thinking when typing earlier.

Low is an amount that allows them to shower at least between the revolving door. But you know that already. Originally Posted by rockerrick

+1

How about our true low volume providers that might have a boyfriend etc. Should we add another 15+ @ month to the total?.....it does add up in time.

Yes Ann I agree I love polls, hard and hot polls, the more the better lol. Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou

This has been discussed to death and beyond, and the ONLY thing that's been agreed upon is that it's relative depending upon personal opinion. I'm a full-time escort/companion/provider (one word doesn't encompass all that I offer) and I believe that I'm low volume, seeing no more than one gentleman in an afternoon and one in the eve, but even that doesn't happen every day. Are are we talking the full meal deal or a snack to get you by? On average, I only see a couple of gentlemen a week for "intrusive" sexual services, maybe another couple of fellows for FBSM or a "limited" gfe visit, and one more for a genuine escort engagement. And if someone asks me specifically to be the first or only gentleman caller of the day, happy to oblige. Since I only offer multi-hour sessions, this formula seems to work for me.

The way this January is going, I'm looking at looking at some low stats. But that's pretty much par for the time of year.

tax free too!! so really $60k a year cash is like $80k a year salary,, not to shabby Originally Posted by RALPHEY BOY

It isn't tax free, or shouldn't be. The Feds don't care what you do for a living as long as you report it, and they'll go after you harder for evasion than the local guys will for prostitution. The fines and time in the Big Pig Pen are not worth the risk, and the IRS will track your bucks through your bank records and scrutinize your lifestyle. I report under the tax code for entertainer, and don't make NEAR as much as it looks like on paper at first glance. Lots of expenses for maintaining an incall, the expected stock of supplies, and my bonny Irish appearance.