Who will be the Republican nominee for POTUS in 2016

Certainly not a mental giant, I do know if you piss people off they probably are not voting for you. The Repubs have gotten good at that of late.
Now be honest, wouldn't you just love to slap the shit out of Cruz? And really, isn't Palin about as stupid a human as there is?
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 11-10-2013, 11:08 AM
Certainly not a mental giant, I do know if you piss people off they probably are not voting for you. The Repubs have gotten good at that of late.
Now be honest, wouldn't you just love to slap the shit out of Cruz? And really, isn't Palin about as stupid a human as there is? Originally Posted by Jimmiwad

yup, on both counts.
Certainly not a mental giant, I do know if you piss people off they probably are not voting for you. The Repubs have gotten good at that of late.
Now be honest, wouldn't you just love to slap the shit out of Cruz? And really, isn't Palin about as stupid a human as there is? Originally Posted by Jimmiwad
Welcome to the party, pal...

JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Maybe you didn't catch Tom Brokaw on Letterman. He had to correct Letterman on the Tea Party and you need correcting as well.

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...-The-Tea-Party

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwGsHxCSosQ

and Ted Cruz doesn't seem to be doing so bad either.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywo...olitical-Class
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
So many choices unlike the democrats. You have Hillary and only Hillary. How sad.

Governors
Christie BA, University of Delaware, JD, from Seton Hall
Jindal BS/BA, Brown University, accepted by Harvard and Yale but studied at Oxford (MA)
Haley BS, Clemson
Brownback Kansas State, JD, KU
Walker Marquette University
Bush BA, University of Texas
Senators
Ryan BA/BA, Miami University
Paul Baylor University, MD, Duke University
Cruz BA, Princeton, JD, Harvard
Rubio BA, University of Florida, JD, University of Miami
Lee BS, Brigham Young, JD BYU
Come Again
Palin BA, University of Idaho
Brown BA, Tufts, JD Boston College
Cain BS, Morehouse College, MS, Purdue
Guilani BA, Manhattan College, JD, New York University
Wild Cards
Trump BS, Wharton School Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Yeah stupid, right....
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 11-10-2013, 12:02 PM
Yeah stupid, right.... Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
having an education (if you really do) doesn't exempt you from being stupid
Munchmasterman's Avatar
I could care less if the GOP gets destroyed because the Tea Party stands firm on it's small government principles. But you are the one who is opining it's demise, not me.

The question is why do you care ?

Answer: Because you like big government, ever ending federalization, higher taxation, out of control spending, debt, and less liberty and freedom. I'm impressed. It looks like you have mastered the j-douche's "Substitute your words for the true thoughts/words of other people to give your lie some chance for success" school of writing test questions.
Today's GOP leadership is dug in, petty, and self-serving; they have no vision for America's future except what they have been doing for the past decades - more spending, more regulations, more political power in Washington. They need to reform or go. Originally Posted by Whirlaway
I agree with the teal colored statement.
Out of all the GOP candidates Christie has the best chance of a nomination. If elected nothing of course guarantees he would be a good president. For the Democrats of course Hillary Clinton. I'll give Clinton this much,she'll flat out tell ya she's a Socialist. She likes to use the term Modern day progressive. I guess it sounds much nicer So if you're into Socialism and everything that goes with it go with Clinton. Christie, his approach is more conventional but he also likes to yell and get obnoxious which might be what we need stir shit up a bit.


Jim
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 11-10-2013, 12:43 PM
Out of all the GOP candidates Christie has the best chance of a nomination. If elected nothing of course guarantees he would be a good president. For the Democrats of course Hillary Clinton. I'll give Clinton this much,she'll flat out tell ya she's a Socialist. She likes to use the term Modern day progressive. I guess it sounds much nicer So if you're into Socialism and everything that goes with it go with Clinton. Christie, his approach is more conventional but he also likes to yell and get obnoxious which might be what we need stir shit up a bit.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

yet another example of a rightwinger who has no concept of socialism
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Your friend Timmie said that the list was made up of morons. Now is that accurate? So I guess we can discount anything further than Timmie has to say on the subject. He has intellectually disqualified himself and he is too blind to see what he did. I hope that Munchie can.

As far as education not showing intelligence....Obama has proven that but we still don't have his transcripts so we don't KNOW if he graduated from anything, had any honors, or just stood out in the crowd for anything other than his color or ability to concoct stories about his past. Now don't make me have to dredge up all those instances when he lied about his past with his publisher, with a convention of socialists, with his admission documents...

I don't know about pure socialism but Hillary definitely has statist tendencies and worse, a sense of justification just like Barry. He for minorities and her for women. They will be allowed to do what they think is right because of the struggle. However, there is a long road between now and the conventions. My guess is that Hillary will not be the nominee. She is either disliked or feared by too many democrats. Look how fast they defected from her camp in 2008. The democrats were looking for anyone to not have to nominate her. They were successful, they found ANYONE without ability, without experience, without a vision, and without the character that a good leader needs.
yet another example of a rightwinger who has no concept of socialism Originally Posted by CJ7
Well unless you've lived in a Socialist country you probably have no concept of what true Socialism is either. I never defined socialism but apparently Clinton understands the concepts of Socialism and feels if she's elected president that's what's best for the country. For those who would support her they would have to adapt the same ideals.


Jim
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 11-10-2013, 03:50 PM
Well unless you've lived in a Socialist country you probably have no concept of what true Socialism is either. I never defined socialism but apparently Clinton understands the concepts of Socialism and feels if she's elected president that's what's best for the country. For those who would support her they would have to adapt the same ideals.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

you don't define it, but you throw it around, and point fingers ...got it.

supporting a candidate usually means you support their ideals ... how profound.
Munchmasterman's Avatar
Yes, the only thing more sad is that your list is made up largely of morons. Actually there is one thing more sad than that: your inability to recognize it. Originally Posted by timpage
j-douche! Over here. No, not the stuffed panda. Just a friendly helper voice.
Can you read? Comprehend said same?
Your strategy of presenting your chin for bitch slap after bitch slap will not work.

You just lied again. See red above and red below.

Wack! And there goes what's left of his head, into the cheap seats.
Your friend Timmie said that the list was made up of morons. Now is that accurate? So I guess we can discount anything further than Timmie has to say on the subject. He has intellectually disqualified himself and he is too blind to see what he did. I hope that Munchie can. Oh I can see alright. You were disqualified so long ago there still was a Great Stone Face in New Hampshire

As far as education not showing intelligence....Obama has proven that but we still don't have his transcripts so we don't KNOW if he graduated from anything, had any honors, or just stood out in the crowd for anything other than his color or ability to concoct stories about his past. Now don't make me have to dredge up all those instances when he lied about his past with his publisher, with a convention of socialists, with his admission documents...
The list of what you don't is long and gets longer every day. Because you cross nothing off the list, you just add incorrect answers.
We know his graduation history. It's easily confirmed. We don't know his grades because they are none of your goddamn business, birther boy.
Bring up the publisher bullshit. We'll beat you with how wrong you are about that.
I don't know about pure socialism but Hillary definitely has statist tendencies and worse, a sense of justification just like Barry. He for minorities and her for women. They will be allowed to do what they think is right because of the struggle. However, there is a long road between now and the conventions. My guess is that Hillary will not be the nominee. She is either disliked or feared by too many democrats. Look how fast they defected from her camp in 2008. The democrats were looking for anyone to not have to nominate her. They were successful, they found ANYONE without ability, without experience, without a vision, and without the character that a good leader needs. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Nothing, no lie, no incorrect info you tout as fact, nothing shames or embarrasses or deters you.

Whack!
Knocked the hose right out of him.
you don't define it, but you throw it around, and point fingers ...got it.

supporting a candidate usually means you support their ideals ... how profound. Originally Posted by CJ7
Let me see if I understand you correctly. You agree I didn't define Socialism in my post but yet I threw the definition around. I would like to know how I managed to do that. Then I was pointing fingers, I suppose at Hillary for stating she is a Socialist, which is only based on her admittance of it. So exactly what is your malfunction, are you afraid of Socialism, or are you bitter against those that oppose it?


Jim