Alternative screening for newbies

CSB & Ellen, guyz, thanks for your input.

Read my words carefully. In no way do I endorse or condemn any of the practices outlined.

In fact, I omitted several methods that providers have told me they use on a regular basis including texting, phoning, e-mail, SNAP, Twitter and other social media.

I was just telling the o.p. what methods some providers use.

Note, I failed to include the phrase "gut instinct," which does not refer to belly fat, btw.

And, most of the several ladies I know who "coffee," usually have a galpal or guypal sitting in the cafe observing. In some instances past, I have been an observer or, indeed, a participant, for that matter. In my case, mainly for "ginger" possibilities (my confessed personal weakness).

If the "gut feel" says no, just say you have an errand and/or lets make it happen manana. Or simply not engage at all.

The essence of meeting in a public space speaks for itself, imo, especially depending on appearance, spoken words and visible gestures. And, if possible, observation of the unkown person's arrival, companions and vehicle.

How does a public mini meet and greet work? Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

The first ECCIE provider I saw was an UTR lovely who had pm'd me in regards to a Coed post of mine. We met at a nice hotel bar for a couple of cocktails one day after work, at my treat. We connected sufficiently to schedule a session for later that week.

She was a well respected UTR, knew most of the SA community, and vouched me "up the ladder," so to speak.

I never showed anyone ID or disclosed real life info, nor was I asked.

Again, a meet and greet doesn’t tell me anything other than how charming you are. And Ted Bundy was charming, soooooo....

Thank you Johnny.

The first ECCIE provider I saw was an UTR lovely who had pm'd me in regards to a Coed post of mine. We met at a nice hotel bar for a couple of cocktails one day after work, at my treat. We connected sufficiently to schedule a session for later that week.

She was a well respected UTR, knew most of the SA community, and vouched me "up the ladder," so to speak.

I never showed anyone ID or disclosed real life info, nor was I asked. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

Ted Bundy - that would have me running out the door-for sure!

Again, a meet and greet doesn’t tell me anything other than how charming you are. And Ted Bundy was charming, soooooo.... Originally Posted by Claire She Blows

The level of screening required declines substantially for some ladies at the end of the month when rent is due...

z

The level of screening required declines substantially for some ladies at the end of the month when rent is due...

z Originally Posted by ztonk

Lol, not this lady...

Again, a meet and greet doesn’t tell me anything other than how charming you are. And Ted Bundy was charming, soooooo.... Originally Posted by Claire She Blows

Yes, and having someone's rw work information will definitely stop them from doing anything bad for sure. Lol.

I've seen you hookers get on here and talk about sharing pictures of a guys dl when you get shorted and so on. Not really just used for safety.

Nothing "set me off."
Then I apologize--and will mark this up to the lack of context, tone, and non-verbal clues. I obviously read your most as more angry than your wrote it.

I disagreed with your post. Must one be "set off" to disagree with one of your posts?
Of course not. I never equated the two in general.

You used a really cheap rhetorical device there, an ad hominem derivative. I find it offensive. I always thought that sort of thing beneath you. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

I'm sorry you found it offensive. I was just trying to clarify my points a bit more. I am not here to try and get into an argument with you (I limit that to a select few who have earned )

Again, a meet and greet doesn’t tell me anything other than how charming you are. And Ted Bundy was charming, soooooo.... Originally Posted by Claire She Blows

That is true--but it can be a significant deterrent to LE if done well. And it says things about cleanliness, civility, etc. For ladies who generally deal in longer dates this is something many of them care about. Is it perfect? No, but then NO form of screening is perfect. There was at least one serial killer of escorts who had an on-line persona on a different board. He went out of his way to see some of the ladies in his area, get good references from them, and then use those references to see and kill other ladies.

Screening is all about butting enough pieces of info together so you feel the risk has been minimized to a level you are willing to accept. No two ladies will ever see it the exact same way.

Yes, and having someone's rw work information will definitely stop them from doing anything bad for sure. Lol. Originally Posted by Kickrocks

The other extreme from Claire's: since it isn't perfect, don't waste time doing it. NO screening is perfect for either side. It is all about how to distribute the risk between the two people. Some guys want the ladies to assume 99% of the risk. Some ladies want the guy to assume 99% of it. If common ground cannot be found, time to look for a different escort to see.

Of course RW info will not stop a psychotic madman, but I strongly suspect it will cause MOST men to behave better and avoid things that they suspect will result in retaliation of some kind.

Having said that, I have not given out any RW info to see someone in a decade or more. For me, I can see most the ladies I want to see without that--but a few wanted more than I was comfortable with and I passed.

Not this old hoogar - not all money is good money - my personal motto.

The level of screening required declines substantially for some ladies at the end of the month when rent is due...

z Originally Posted by ztonk

And, definitely in the FWIW department.

Many hobbying veterans (females and males) hereabouts can cite chapter and verse about previously very vouched and verified males and females who, after a few or even many years of spotless hobbying have "gone off the rails" for whatever reason.

ijs