I’ve yet to see one comment offering intelligent support FOR excessive body ink, all I keep seeing is that it’s YOUR preference or MY (provider’s) personal preference and that if I don’t like it, too bad. Problem is, when it’s excessive and visible, the rest of us can’t just ignore it any more. It’s just body graffiti to most of us and just as unattractive – if you want to do it, do it where the rest of us don’t have to look at it. We need a filter for tats just like age, ethnicity, location, build, cup, waist, hips, breast, height, weight, eye color, hair color and hair length. Or, do the little heads (and tattooed providers) deny the validity of using those filters, too? If so, you’re more hypocritical than you’ll admit. Originally Posted by Sickpuppy
Intelligent support?
It's simple.
I'm an adult. My ancestors and their friends fought for my freedom to be able to make these decisions.
I decided that I wanted to have tattoos.
I started getting tattoos at 18. I am now 35. That's probably longer than any fad that you were a part of.
What else do you need to know?
I have yet to figure out a valid reason why you think your judgements hold any leverage.
Plenty of people get tattoos and regret them. Plenty of people get tattoos and do not regret them.
Why does it bother you so much? All you have to do is ask, "Before we meet can you please let me know if you have tattoos. Thank you." If you see a lady on the street with a tattoo, you can close your eyes and look the other way. If I knew your face behind your piss poor attitude and I ever saw you in public, I would look the other way.