Is it ok to ask new clients if they are LE?

BUT, I thought as long as you have the "disclaimer" in your ads/website about it being for time and companionship only/what happens between consenting adults..
OR even better..the one proclaiming that if you are LE of any kind, it is entrapment..etc...they can't prosecute!! Originally Posted by ratboy jam

Written tongue in cheek..FIRMLY planted!!

get a couple of references, verify employment if you have to, screen.....screen.....and you never had to be forced to have opportunity. only a few crooks will get laid then bust....but with all the bad press, they may just pay and leave vs. taking you in. they are not to engage all the way. easiest way is the make em perform oral on you first.......wont have to ask me twice. lol

Written tongue in cheek..FIRMLY planted!! Originally Posted by ratboy jam

I hope we ALL knew that, lol ......

.... they are not to engage all the way. Originally Posted by windowshopper

Except for the Sheriffs Department in Virginia that paid, completed the deal, left a tip... and returned several times...

Or the officer in Beaumont that completed the deal ... paid with tax payer money and said he was just following orders... and his wife supported him in his actions...

Or the State Police in Michigan that paid an informer to wear a wire while getting laid with State Money...

OMG...REALLY!!!!

Written tongue in cheek..FIRMLY planted!! Originally Posted by ratboy jam

Whose tongue and whose cheek?

Whose tongue and which cheek?

Whose tongue and which cheek? Originally Posted by notanewbie

Like I've said before..Holly's "cheek" was my first..AND looking at that closeup..who could blame me??

i wouldn't suggest that, it looks incriminating to You. NEVER discuss money or p4p and You should be fine. ive offered to help You out before and the offer still stands if You want to do lunch. im a newb myself though kinda, a Year at it now, but ive not had any problems.

OMG...REALLY!!!! Originally Posted by babydollsnow

Yup... documented ... real talk...

Yup... documented ... real talk... Originally Posted by ThatManFromTexas

HOFFA v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 293 (1966)

.. and following.

"The petitioner's conversations with Partin (an informant) and in Partin's presence were wholly voluntary. For that reason, if for no other, it is clear that no right protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination was violated in this case."

The standard is that the admissions must be the result of "coercion" and generally speaking lying doesn't meet that standard.

Hoffa case:
"No rights under the Fourth Amendment were violated by the failure of Partin to disclose his role as a government informer. When Hoffa made incriminating statements to or in the presence of Partin, his invitee, he relied, not on the security of the hotel room, but on his misplaced confidence that Partin would not reveal his wrongdoing."

Just so you know, entrapment is 100% bnonafide legal in the US. So that means you can ask an undercover to his face if he is a cop, he can say no, then turn around and arrest you. Hun, if you have doubts I would suggest just walking away. No ammt of money is worth jeopardizing your future over.

misdemeanor is the charge right....anyone ever been busted? I have seen advertising attorneys that specialize in these type of cases. What is the penalty? 30 days probation to not mess with another fuctard?

From what I have seen, strippers get it all the time in raids....violating 3 feet rule, etc...

Is there ANY way to be sure (from both sides of the aisle)?

abdclub

Just so you know, entrapment is 100% bnonafide legal in the US. Originally Posted by Victoria of Houston

No it isn't. Cases have been reversed when able to prove entrapment.

Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435

Sherman v. United States ,356 U.S. 369

There is a lot of confusion in this community about what constitutes Entrapment

1. entrapment is constituted by a law enforcement agent inducing a person to commit an offense that the person would otherwise have been unlikely to commit...



2. there is no entrapment where a person is ready and willing to break the law and the Government agents merely provide what appears to be a favorable opportunity for the person to commit the crime.



Entrapment if three conditions are fulfilled:

- First, the idea for committing the crime came from the government agents and not from the person accused of the crime.


- Second, the government agents then persuaded or talked the person into committing the crime. Simply giving him the opportunity to commit the crime is not the same as persuading him to commit the crime.


- And third, the person was not ready and willing to commit the crime before the government agents spoke with him.


Just another educational benefit of ECCIE...