Bloomberg's Box

they hate all rich people.

why else would they have coined the slogan "tax the rich"??? Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Well, they are lazy and greedy motherfuckers...

Except. of course, the Fascist DPST nomenklatura leaders!

Except. of course, the Fascist DPST nomenklatura leaders! Originally Posted by oeb11

They want power for themselves and cushy jobs for their kids, paid for by the government.

Yup exactly

Except. of course, the Fascist DPST nomenklatura leaders! Originally Posted by oeb11

Bunch of commies...

I think they hate Trump because he is an arrogant liar. Not because he is a billionaire. Or maybe it is because he got in bed with those holy rollers on the right Originally Posted by WTF

No, they hate Trump because he was once a Democrat. Then one night at a White House Correspondence Dinner that Trump attended. Obama and some guest decided to do an impromptu roast on Trump. Trump didn't think it was funny so in his revenge you might say he decided to run for president on the Republican ticket, and handed them their asses. The more the Democrats fight Trump the more he skins them up. They can't buy him, they can't reason with him and they can't beat him. That's why they hate Trump.

Does everyone here think Kobe got away with rape or was the accusation a shakedown?

I wonder if Bloomie would defend Kobe from his box?

Bloomie has more money and has a decent chance to defeat Trump if he can get the nomination - ... Originally Posted by friendly fred

What are his ("Bloomie's) "credentials" and RW experiences?

He began his career at the securities brokerage Salomon Brothers, before forming his own company in 1981, Bloomberg L.P., a global financial services, software and mass media company that bears his name, and is known for its Bloomberg Terminal, a computer software system providing financial data widely used in the global financial services industry. He spent the next twenty years as its chairman and CEO.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=how+di...FORM=QBLH&sp=2


+ "Mayor"!

https://ny.curbed.com/2019/11/25/209...g-homeless-nyc

Unfortunately for "Bloomie" and many others who have fallen by the wayside in the Trump wave of 2016 ..... most of them Republican "old-timers" .... Trump knows "all about them" ... because he has been in the commercial development business during their "public service" and know the reality on the ground.

Since "Bloomie" is running on his "record" as "Mayor" of NYC, like the Socialist in there now was running on "his mayoral experience" ..... his three term "success" is at issue. His campaign "brags" will not hold under the coming barrage of FACTS!

HC carried NY based on one or two district margins .... the question is: Can "Bloomie" carry those same districts by the same margins or better.

What are his ("Bloomie's) "credentials" and RW experiences?


https://www.bing.com/search?q=how+di...FORM=QBLH&sp=2


+ "Mayor"!

https://ny.curbed.com/2019/11/25/209...g-homeless-nyc

Unfortunately for "Bloomie" and many others who have fallen by the wayside in the Trump wave of 2016 ..... most of them Republican "old-timers" .... Trump knows "all about them" ... because he has been in the commercial development business during their "public service" and know the reality on the ground.

Since "Bloomie" is running on his "record" as "Mayor" of NYC, like the Socialist in there now was running on "his mayoral experience" ..... his three term "success" is at issue. His campaign "brags" will not hold under the coming barrage of FACTS!

HC carried NY based on one or two district margins .... the question is: Can "Bloomie" carry those same districts by the same margins or better. Originally Posted by LexusLover

He was definitely hard on black criminals as Mayor - maybe he can pay them reparations from his own pocket.

He was definitely hard on black criminals as Mayor - maybe he can pay them reparations from his own pocket. Originally Posted by friendly fred

I doubt the "stop and frisk" policy targeted the Black community ... but it may have impacted those Black people who sought to peruse neighborhoods and business zones for targets of opportunity.

BTY: "stop and frisk" (although a misnomer) was approved by the SCOTUS in Terry vs. Ohio, and Clarence Thomas wrote on it more recently by explaining the "misnomer" and the scope of the tactic.

If one wishes to be more enlightened on the topic the case immediately following Terry in the U.S. Supreme Court Reporter is "New York vs. Sibron aka Sibron vs. New York (which is actually two cases combined as the Court often does on its docket) in which the Court explains the holdings in Terry.

But just because the SC "authorizes" the activity doesn't mean agencies must comply with it and can establish their own contrary departmental policies. Under Bloomberg the city adopted "stop and frisk" as a discretionary policy.

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CPL/140.50

Section 140.50
Temporary questioning of persons in public places; search for weapons
Criminal Procedure (CPL)
SHARE
Facebook
Twitter
Email
§ 140.50 Temporary questioning of persons in public places; search for

weapons.

1. In addition to the authority provided by this article for making an arrest without a warrant, a police officer may stop a person in a public place located within the geographical area of such officer's employment when he reasonably suspects that such person is committing, has committed or is about to commit either (a) a felony or (b) a misdemeanor defined in the penal law, and may demand of him his name, address and an explanation of his conduct.

2. Any person who is a peace officer and who provides security services for any court of the unified court system may stop a person in or about the courthouse to which he is assigned when he reasonably suspects that such person is committing, has committed or is about to commit either (a) a felony or (b) a misdemeanor defined in the penal law, and may demand of him his name, address and an explanation of his conduct.

3. When upon stopping a person under circumstances prescribed in subdivisions one and two a police officer or court officer, as the case may be, reasonably suspects that he is in danger of physical injury, he may search such person for a deadly weapon or any instrument, article or substance readily capable of causing serious physical injury and of a sort not ordinarily carried in public places by law-abiding persons. If he finds such a weapon or instrument, or any other property possession of which he reasonably believes may constitute the commission of a crime, he may take it and keep it until the completion of the questioning, at which time he shall either return it, if lawfully possessed, or arrest such person.

4. In cities with a population of one million or more, information that establishes the personal identity of an individual who has been stopped, questioned and/or frisked by a police officer or peace officer, such as the name, address or social security number of such person, shall not be recorded in a computerized or electronic database if that individual is released without further legal action; provided, however, that this subdivision shall not prohibit police officers or peace officers from including in a computerized or electronic database generic characteristics of an individual, such as race and gender, who has been stopped, questioned and/or frisked by a police officer or peace officer.

The distinction (created by the misnomer) is in the statute it authorizes the officer "TO STOP" the suspicious PERSON

and that's not what the SCOTUS authorized! But that was an interpretation applied throughout the country. Thomas later clarified that ... which is a source of criticism of the NYC practice following the unauthorized statute passed by the NY legislature.

They want power for themselves and cushy jobs for their kids, paid for by the government. Originally Posted by friendly fred

https://www.thedailybeast.com/meet-t...amily-business

Apparently yous are describing the Trump regime quite accurately, fredsy.

Is Bloomie Gay?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/meet-t...amily-business

Apparently yous are describing the Trump regime quite accurately, fredsy. Originally Posted by HoeHummer

She doesn't need her father to be president to have money and a cushy job. All Trump's kids were born into it. Besides they are all pretty smart and know the business world. The yearly salary of the President is 400,000 a year, Ivanka Trump makes that every three months by herself. So stuff your hating bullshit up your fucking ass where it belongs.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/meet-t...amily-business

Apparently yous are describing the Trump regime quite accurately, fredsy. Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Do you Canadians not employ your own children in your own businesses?