For you newbies trying to get your, uh, feet, yeah, wet...

See, the problem here Fancy is that I have no way of knowing that you originally posted this in Coed or somewhere else and an admintard with a secret agenda moved it here and didn't tell anyone.
Therefore, threADs go unchecked and pop up more often as unintended consequences of those actions.
So my point is not that you did anything wrong by posting here. My point is my fun may have been hampered by the uncertainty of whether you did or not. Based on the number of unchecked threADs in this forum alone over the past few months I'd say others feel the same way.

Originally Posted by Hottentot Venus

Cuz that makes it light hearted. Right?

Therefore, threADs go unchecked and pop up more often as unintended consequences of those actions.
. Originally Posted by boardman

Up to 5 links please.

Up to 5 links please. Originally Posted by Pistolero

Didn't you mean "at least" 5 links.

If you really meant "up to" you're reading one now apparently and your request has been fulfilled...My work is done.

See, the problem here Fancy is that I have no way of knowing that you originally posted this in Coed or somewhere else and an admintard with a secret agenda moved it here and didn't tell anyone.
Therefore, threADs go unchecked and pop up more often as unintended consequences of those actions.
So my point is not that you did anything wrong by posting here. My point is my fun may have been hampered by the uncertainty of whether you did or not. Based on the number of unchecked threADs in this forum alone over the past few months I'd say others feel the same way. Originally Posted by boardman

Your catnip is making me dizzy.

Your catnip is making me dizzy. Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Damn....forgot to send in information...Its been a crazy week already...

Your catnip is making me dizzy. Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Sorry Fancy,
I still lub you.

It works. Because, benevolence sees it as semi-useful even though it is quickly turning into an AD sticky. ThreADs about it could change all that......ijs

Blame me, not the mods. They don't have anything to do with it, other than allowing me the role of Dr. Frankenstein in the experiment. ("It's aliiiiiiive!") So far, the parts are working together well. (Next, I go play Dracula and suck something. )

Some newbies might actually value this info, ya know. Not all fellows perusing ECCIE even realize there IS such a sticky, a place to find ladies who don't require 2 refs, and that it's in the ISO section. I thought it was a valid FYI for Co-ed. Sue me. I'll pay you in chihuahua-rolled burritos, extra crunchy bugs, lizards, twigs, and Milkbones included. Good protein and fiber.

Everybody has to start somewhere. Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Good ... you are now blamed ...

It works. Because, benevolence sees it as semi-useful even though it is quickly turning into an AD sticky. ThreADs about it could change all that......ijs Originally Posted by dearhunter

Are you reading the same thread? I don't see anything in the Houston Newbie-Friendly Provider List that is tuning it into an "AD sticky." No rates or specials or times of availability are being mentioned. I ASK providers to come in and state their screening policies for clarification. I started putting in general locations as many gentlemen were complaining that they had to weed through too many Showcases to find newbie-friendly ladies in their areas. So far, most posters have behaved as requested, and the providers who weren't or couldn't comply with the guidelines were deleted by the editor-in-chieftess. (Except for CD, who's just flat out too busy for newbs, dang her pretty redhead.) I'm the only real multiple poster in it, edits, clarifications, suggestions, blah, blah. I don't even include my own signature line when doing the updates to avoid any favoritism of ME.

Yes, I, and others, do post links about it on threads where guys are ASKING for providers who fit the bill, or when the OP's are so new to ECCIE that they are likely to find the carnal compilation advantageous. Have you noticed how many members are linking someone to something here or elsewhere? Links to the rules; links to what a mod said about the rules; links to reviews; links to how to post reviews; links to acronyms; links to news stories; links to BP; links to funny stuff; links to gross stuff; links to bad pics; links to good pics; links to porn pics; links to other links; it's a compulsion of plague-like proportions! Not to mention that certain ladies (and a few gentlemen ) get tons o' publicity with all of the thread titles dropping their names. (By the way, feel free, people, to start another about my chihuahuas, or Irishness, or high heels, or grammatical correctness, or MSOG for leprechauns, or whatever. Thank you in advance for the PR. )

It's just a list for the convenience of the unwashed uninitiated, so that they can be baptized and cleansed of celibacy and abstinence, both deplorable conditions, but absolutely curable. However, like most medicine, there's a price. I still think providers of sexual health care should be deductible insurance expenses.

Didn't you mean "at least" 5 links.

If you really meant "up to" you're reading one now apparently and your request has been fulfilled...My work is done. Originally Posted by boardman

Helll no. If I had not put a limit we have several pages of links from, just to see if we would click on all of them . I knew what I was doing

I checked your list and there are no problems.

Helll no. If I had not put a limit we have several pages of links from, just to see if we would click on all of them . I knew what I was doing

I checked your list and there are no problems. Originally Posted by Pistolero