I'm not sure where I fall on that cake issue honestly. If that was what you wanted to dig up and debate here you could have added something to your copy paste effort of a first post.The facts of that case are that the baker in question had no problem with selling to his off-the-shelf products to homosexuals; so, there was in fact no "discrimination". It was the subsequent demand by the homosexual couple for particular modifications to his art and craft that he objected to.
I would've gone to someone that wanted to make my cake and fuck that cake shop. Prop up the other shop near by.
But the use of religion to discrimanate aginst someone or some group... does it stop at cake? Does it stop with gays? You tell me. Originally Posted by Trey
The mantra that the baker should be forced to bend -- by state dictate -- his artistic talent to conform to the whims of their sexual identification is what he didn't and couldn't agree with. Such a demand is coercive and is in violation of the 1st Amendment on more than one point.