It is more complicated than you can understand. This source is right in the center on the bias scale.
https://www.tennessean.com/story/new...ck/7641800002/
If a city was "defunded", it generally means funds were shifted to other departments. It also doesn't mean their budgets were cut in half or totally shut down. Usually it is a 5% funding shift. This funding doesn't make overnight changes, it takes at least a couple years for the the programs to ramp up.
Crime is going to happen no matter what. Police aren't on every corner watching things. Police respond to situations when needed. Occasionally police are right there, but that isn't the norm. It is idiotic to say "a woman got her head cut off" that was because of defunding.... Anyone could walk down a street with big knife and cut someones head off and there isn't a fucking thing police can do about it except respond, report and investigate. Then hopefully find and arrest the perp.
It would be funny to look at this list of cities and their crime rates and when the last Republican Mayor governed each. It might be revealing to show that there is a correlation between voting Democrat and increased crime and poverty. But that might be RAYCISS.
ew York City
Washington, D.C.
Baltimore
Philadelphia
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Atlanta
Minneapolis
Seattle
Salt Lake City
Portland, Oregon
Hartford, Connecticut
Norman Oklahoma,
Austin, Texas
Doesn't bother me, I don't have to exist in those shit-holes. Let the people get what they deserve for voting Democrat. Poverty, crime ridden, and corruption is simply the result of being stupid.
It's Darwin writ large. Stupid people make stupid voting decisions and incur stupid results. Being stupid, they blame this on the people they DIDN'T elect... or Whitey because... well it can't be that they are too stupid to make better decisions.
The libtards are hopeless.
Originally Posted by texassapper