Mavericktravis steady uploading videos without consent

Once you allow him to take video image, it's his to do with what he wants.
If you don't want that occuring, it's your responsibility not to let it be done.
You could always only allow images to be taken on your phone then email approved images.
Then you can delete images with full knowledge they weren't uploaded to cloud.
Pretty much common sense.

I'm in no way defending the hobbyist's behavior, but if you allow a client to film you, you should expect the client to publish the video on porn sites. It's just common sense. Originally Posted by ShysterJon

I agree but in this day and age with all the crap and discrimination..figured atleast when a MARRIED man says hell be discreet amd use for personal use..u tend to believe they wouldn't want to stir trouble. Respect has to start somewhere .i hate people who cant enjoy this business for what its worth! Lesson learned tho

Bs! So i guess the term 'discretion' doesnt really exist??

A few things to point out.

As ShysterJon states. Your a Provider allowing a John to take pics and videos. Did you not think they would end up somewhere.

I have looked at all 3 providers list of reviews and there are no video from the hobbiest on your reviews. What he has posted elsewhere is none of our concern or business what you did as 2 consenting adults.

As for Candilady214. If you didn't want anyone to know what you did or what you looked like you shouldn't have posted your own face pics on your showcase.

Not an alert. Moved to COED. Originally Posted by Admiral Giggle

Well that was lesson learned I've been providing video since 2013 I have never had a John do this so now that service will no longer be provided one bad seed has ruined it for all

Once you allow him to take video image, it's his to do with what he wants.
If you don't want that occuring, it's your responsibility not to let it be done.
You could always only allow images to be taken on your phone then email approved images.
Then you can delete images with full knowledge they weren't uploaded to cloud.
Pretty much common sense. Originally Posted by rockerrick

Not entirely true. Once he posts it to a porn site, she can file a DMCA request to have it removed.. and can get him removed from the site entirely by informing them that he is filming and posting content without permission or a filed 2251. Tube sites don't fuck around if you let them know you are aware of the laws that govern their industry.

I've been providing video since 2013 I have never had a John do this Originally Posted by Spinner China

THAT YOU KNOW OF!! I bet those videos are floating on the internet somewhere

Not entirely true. Once he posts it to a porn site, she can file a DMCA request to have it removed.. and can get him removed from the site entirely by informing them that he is filming and posting content without permission or a filed 2251. Tube sites don't fuck around if you let them know you are aware of the laws that govern their industry. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

You know once it's uploaded, it's on the internet forever! Don't allow videos or pics, problem solved

Bummer.

Oh hey what's the link to the video

What worries me is the butchering of the Queen's English. When will it end?

Cant understand half of what it's written...

We did post in alerts not discussion because we did not ask for a discussion right above Another one just like this the moderator moved it to this board as it says above thanks Originally Posted by candilady214

There is a ladies info share/alert area. It's called the Powder Room, gents do not have access (except male mods) and it is separate from the main alerts forum. I believe the gents are saying, this should have been posted in the ladies area.

I need to apologize.

I just read my comment when I moved this from alerts.

My grammar truly sucks today.

As for the rest.

ECCiE moderators are not the Internet police. What happens off the board is not our business nor do we have any powers to police the net.

He has done nothing on ECCIE to warrant a warning, infraction, or banning.

Your frustration, anger, and concern is justified. However, I find it interesting that all 3 of you chose NOW to post about this.

Unless all 3 of you were under the influence of alcohol, a forbidden substance, or his beguiling good looks and charm, you were ALL consenting adults.

Every seasoned ECCIE provider could've told you to not do videos. I'm sure many newbies have had regret and buyers remorse after picture and video sessions.

Nothing ever stays private.

The guys posting are pointing out the obvious errors in judgement on your part.

Your hurt and anger are causing you to lash out at them.

Just because a title may say "video" doesn't mean there is a video in the review. If you read the pages worth of comments, most state "send me the link.

Does this fall into revenge porn?

Or is this because a client paid for filming he has the right to do as he pleases?

Still doesn't make it right! Your comments make me question if you've been secretly filming the ladies. Providers will now need to check you when you enter the incall to make sure you aren't sneaking in a camera. Originally Posted by MW76

You're an idiot.

1. You quote me, but you leave out the critical first clause (in red boldface, below):

"I'm in no way defending the hobbyist's behavior, but if you allow a client to film you, you should expect the client to publish the video on porn sites. It's just common sense."

2. If you didn't just get off the banana boat, you'd know I haven't hobbied in more than 10 years.

Newbie, if you plan on making an intelligent contribution here, pull your stupid head out of your ass.

Still doesn't make it right! Your comments make me question if you've been secretly filming the ladies. Providers will now need to check you when you enter the incall to make sure you aren't sneaking in a camera. Originally Posted by MW76

My original post on this thread now has a lot of likes. This shows a lot of people on this site agree with me. I think ALL providers need to make a DNS list of the hobbyists making posts about secretly disseminating session videos without asking providers first being no big deal.

AdmiralGiggle, NeedingMilking, Pistol Shot, and Rockerrick could be added to a DNS list based on comments they've made on this thread. Their comments make you think they may secretly sneak a camera in a session and post video of session online without informing providers.

It's not a legal vs illegal thing, but a right vs wrong thing. Some hobbyists on this thread are saying you wouldn't have hobbyists doing this if providers didn't allow videoing. That's faulty logic. It's like saying a woman is responsible for being assaulted if she wears a tight fitting outfit or for going to a bar. A hobbyist wouldn't get robbed by a pimp if he never sees a provider. Your logic blames the victim and gives a pass to the perp. Sad!!

Still doesn't make it right! Your comments make me question if you've been secretly filming the ladies. Providers will now need to check you when you enter the incall to make sure you aren't sneaking in a camera. Originally Posted by MW76

You're an idiot.

1. You quote me, but you leave out the critical first clause (in red boldface, below):

"I'm in no way defending the hobbyist's behavior, but if you allow a client to film you, you should expect the client to publish the video on porn sites. It's just common sense."

2. If you didn't just get off the banana boat, you'd know I haven't hobbied in more than 10 years.

Newbie, if you plan on making an intelligent contribution here, pull your stupid head out of your ass.