Gentlemen? Would you do business with an Agency or Providers that reviewed you in a Searcheable Database the way ECCIE offers reviews of Providers

Oh HELL NO!! I pay for the girls services, not to be rated for mine. When they start paying me then they can rate me! I am not married so I don't give a flying shit about the rest of the stuff..

Ok, so my buddy asked me why I am sticking up for Marco. I am not sticking up for Marco. I couldn't care less about Marco. The topic I believe and title of this thread is, "Gentlemen? Would you do business with an Agency or Providers that reviewed you in a Searcheable Database the way ECCIE offers reviews of Providers".

Answer is yes, if I like and want to see one or more of the girls at that agency, I guess I will need to use that agency. And, of course that assumes that the reviews are positive... if it isn't, it is a mute point since whether I wanted to use the agency or not, I wouldn't be able to use it to book appointments in any case.

It seems that everyone is focused on who's paying the money, and therefore who gets to review who. Hey, it is a free country. If you don't agree, just don't use that service, simple as that. If you are of the opinion that a session is a business transaction, then you must recognize that the transaction only happens because there is a bilateral exchange of value. What I am saying is, I might be paying the money, but she's got the goods I want, and I want it delivered with a smile.

So, to me this whole controversy is not all that far off from a provider that otherwise has great reputation and reviews, then has a bad day or a bad client and gets a bad review. Would the reaction have been different if the review or "recommendation" was positive? That the guy was a hunk, a stud, generous, etc. etc. and every girl's dream. What is best advice? Get over it... I remember something like that happening to my ATF emeritus... she posted an ill advised rebuttal, did it poorly and she got crucified. Yup, she should have just moved on...

Although not all of the guys are studs like you Kboy... or more the attentive lover types like you.... I really do not think anyone is overly concerned that their performance, general likes or dislikes are discussed between the ladies....

It is the concept of a physical description being tied to an ECCIE Handle that can be tied to reviews that matters to me and to many others I think. That and the issue of WHO is behind this particular project....

I assume that our performance as guys gets talked about a lot without our knowledge. That's fine with me b/c the discussion is pretty much anonymous via the use of board handles. If a provider wants to post a "ROS" thread about my time with her in the "Powder Room", I don't have a problem with that. I begin to have issues when it becomes a searchable database that includes the following:

My board handle
My hobby phone #
My hobby e-mail address
Date, time and location of rendezvous

With that type of information, patterns can be established and a lot of damage can be done for those who demand discretion. When we review ladies, certain information listed above is necessary for the guys in order to contact a provider who's review a guy likes and wants to see her. If on the other hand, clients contact info is revealed, all hell could break loose, and I'm only talking about SPAM let alone providers contacting guys unsolicited. Just a bad idea for clients to be in a searchable database. It's bad enough that our number and e-mail are in some gal's computer somewhere.

How often are these agencies busted and their databases used to bust clients or at least get some attention grabbing headlines for LE or Da's up for election on the 10 PM news?

Oh one day this will have less anonymity. Providers are going to want a profile with descriptions and may even want a picture emailed to them. They will review clients to assist other providers in making a decision. That won't happen until LE gets a bit more of a foot hold on the internet end of escorting. At this time I am not that crazy about having providers do reviews on clients.

I can't imagine how insulting or embarrassing your customer is good for business.

I like to keep my business my business and I value my privacy. If a provider needs to post my discription or that I have spent time with her she is not for me. I like to keep things on the dl.

How often are these agencies busted and their databases used to bust clients or at least get some attention grabbing headlines for LE or Da's up for election on the 10 PM news? Originally Posted by tigercat

Just b/c someone's name is in a database is not evidence of a crime. Does it raise suspicion, sure. Is it enough to bust someone, hardly.

Just b/c someone's name is in a database is not evidence of a crime. Does it raise suspicion, sure. Is it enough to bust someone, hardly. Originally Posted by Cpalmson

Typically I would say you are correct Cplam. In this case simply Google "Desert Divas" That will open your eyes to what can happen.

Just b/c someone's name is in a database is not evidence of a crime. Does it raise suspicion, sure. Is it enough to bust someone, hardly. Originally Posted by Cpalmson

Typically I would say you are correct Cplam. In this case simply Google "Desert Divas" That will open your eyes to what can happen.