This is a political stunt, plain and simple. Trumpolini Lemmings are cumming all over themselves shouting "Yeah, Trump! Saving jobs!" LMFAOOOOO.....well the way I see it odumbo got played by the auto makers they got payed and still moving jobs out of the country Trump stop jobs from being moved out no wonder they call you pro-plugged-ass hypocrite
Trump would have to do one of these savior jobs every week for 30 YEARS to save as many jobs as Obama's auto bailout. Fucking FAUX News cheers this but denounced Obsma's. Fucking hypocrites. Originally Posted by Prolongus
This is a political stunt, plain and simple. Trumpolini Lemmings are cumming all over themselves shouting "Yeah, Trump! Saving jobs!" LMFAOOOOO.....It was Bush who initiated the auto bailout you stupid fucking liberal faggot.
Trump would have to do one of these savior jobs every week for 30 YEARS to save as many jobs as Obama's auto bailout. Fucking FAUX News cheers this but denounced Obsma's. Fucking hypocrites. Originally Posted by Prolongus
This is typical Trump. He got played like a fool and he is acting as if it is a victory. Trump and Pence promised that the state and feds would pick up the cost of keeping those people employed is what it boils down to. Originally Posted by BigLouieAll I heard is the state of Indiana will throw in tax abatements worth $700k a year to Carrier. Can you do simple math, littlephooey? It works out to $7k per worker annually. That's a token concession, and one that should be measured against the far greater loss of tax revenues that the state, local municipalities and feds would suffer if production moves to Mexico. So it is COMPLETE NONSENSE for you to say the "state and feds would pick up the cost of keeping those people employed." If Carrier's payroll cost is $70k per worker (and I'm probably low-balling it), the tax concession would only be equivalent to 10% of that.
It was Bush who initiated the auto bailout you stupid fucking liberal faggot.As I pointed out 3 years ago, all Obama did was figure out how to put GM and Chrysler through a "managed bankruptcy" - so he could redirect billions of taxpayer dollars into the hands of his crony UAW and union supporters instead of repaying the US Treasury.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.newyo...automakers/amp Originally Posted by bambino
Obama bent all of the long-standing rules of bankruptcy (regarding debt seniority and security interests) to reward the UAW at the expense of taxpayers and other creditors. It was a backdoor way to shovel tax dollars to his crony union supporters and avoid concessions they would have made in a normal bankruptcy. Taxpayers didn't have to lose $10 billion. The US Treasury could have been fully repaid two years ago if the normal rules of bankruptcy had been followed. The fact that it didn't happen was a huge scandal... Originally Posted by lustylad
As I pointed out 3 years ago, all Obama did was figure out how to put GM and Chrysler through a "managed bankruptcy" - so he could redirect billions of taxpayer dollars into the hands of his crony UAW and union supporters instead of repaying the US Treasury. Originally Posted by lustyladObama didn't figure anything out. Someone else figured it out for him.
Obama didn't figure anything out. Someone else figured it out for him. Originally Posted by bambinoYeah, that little twerp Steven Rattner.
All I heard is the state of Indiana will throw in tax abatements worth $700k a year to Carrier. Can you do simple math, littlephooey? It works out to $7k per worker annually. That's a token concession, and one that should be measured against the far greater loss of tax revenues that the state, local municipalities and feds would suffer if production moves to Mexico. So it is COMPLETE NONSENSE for you to say the "state and feds would pick up the cost of keeping those people employed." If Carrier's payroll cost is $70k per worker (and I'm probably low-balling it), the tax concession would only be equivalent to 10% of that.actually it is more like 7700 jobs
You're trying to play us, but we're not fools. Unlike you, we can do simple math. Originally Posted by lustylad
This is a con job. He promised millions in tax breaks to keep less than half the people here. If they do the same thing HP and Ford did when Bush have them deals, Carrier will bring back cash from over seas, but buy back their own stock to drive up the price and all the execs will exercise their stock options and get more rich and when no one notices will let go of the people they kept. Carrier made a great deal andv it cost them nothing and they got free millions Originally Posted by BigLouiedid they? maybe all they got is the kind of much needed redo of the US's corp income tax regs? which candidate of several railed the loudest against the US's over complicated and loaded with loopholes corp taxes? the guy that actually owns a business. imagine that. even CarlyGirl knew that too
Carrier is a subsidiary of United Technologies, and one of their customers is the Pentagon. They're gonna piss off Trump by moving jobs to Mexico and jeopardize their standing with the defense department? Nope. So 1,000 jobs were saved in Indiana. Small potatoes when you consider our economy has lost or gained hundreds of thousands of jobs a month in the past.Trump didn't have to threaten UT with anything to get this done. he just did exactly the opposite of Obama and by extension Clinton. he did something for Americans first.
Trumpolini's learning how to be a politician, ha ha... Originally Posted by Prolongus
This is typical Trump. He got played like a fool and he is acting as if it is a victory. Trump and Pence promised that the state and feds would pick up the cost of keeping those people employed is what it boils down to. Originally Posted by BigLouie
Link please. Originally Posted by bambinoHere's one for you, TITZ: