Nasty (yuck) horny "providers" should pay us! Originally Posted by S O BI don't know about paying the guys, but it doesn't make sense for a provider to charge to fulfill her fantasies. If someone does a favor for you then you don't want them to turn around and charge you for helping. Bit tacky.
I don't know about paying the guys, but it doesn't make sense for a provider to charge to fulfill her fantasies. If someone does a favor for you then you don't want them to turn around and charge you for helping. Bit tacky.Not tacky when others have expressed it was their fantasy too. ..Also not saying anyone in particular but most has S/o's yet come here as well..isn't that wanting one's cake and eating it too...why is it different is role is reversed?
It seems to be a case of wanting one's cake and eating it, too. Originally Posted by Sternomancer
Not tacky when others have expressed it was their fantasy too. ..Also not saying anyone in particular but most has S/o's yet come here as well..isn't that wanting one's cake and eating it too...why is it different is role is reversed?If both have the fantasy then it would probably be best to leave it as a mutually beneficial activity free from any monetary obligations.
Not that it matters but if a dude asked me to pay him cause it was my fantasy then I would..fair is fair... Originally Posted by VictoriaLyn
you will have an uphill battle convincing hobbyists though. No way I'd pay that amount when it's so available (BG parties) without any charge except for necessities. There's already been a few weigh in on this. Originally Posted by nugletIf by "available without charge" you mean the gangbang parties put on by the local Yahoo group, yes, some of us have weighed in on that. We've noted just how ghastly the women in the photos are. I DIDN'T say it so explicitly before because I thought I made my point with the single word YIKES, but I will now - No way I'm sticking my dick in those things. I wouldn't gangbang anyone I wouldn't fuck 1-on-1, and you couldn't PAY me to fuck those chicks.
Gotta admit that I got some push-back on this when I was trying to organize a gangbang for a provider I know from Houston. What I got from some (not all) guys was "If it's her fantasy, why should we pay?" Well, you pay because that's how the girl makes her living, and because you're not her boyfriend/husband/pimp.Whew!! I would only question how much f**king and s**king the average provider can take before she says "Enough!!". In most 1 hour sessions, a provider is probably only "servicing" her client for maybe 30 minutes, and some of that may be very relaxed. In a GB scenario, I would expect the action to be hot and heavy for almost the whole time -- constant action at both ends for two hours!! Then rest for an hour and repeat. I remember an old joke with the punch line something like "making a hole weak".
It just seems unreasonable to expect a provider to do it for free, even if it's her most erotic unfulfilled fantasy. It's also unreasonable for her to charge full rates (or higher), as if every guy there had been dying to gangbang her all his life. In the case of the Houston provider, she was willing to come way down on her normal rate, so it's not like there wasn't an accommodation made.
Here's my attempt at hooker math: say a provider plans to stack up 4 clients. I'm going to allow 1 hour before the first, and 1 hour between appointments for freshening up, tidying up the bedroom, and making sure clients don't cross paths. Each is going to pay $200 for a 60 min GFE session. That's $800 for 8 hours of committed time.
Now if the same provider sees 4 guys for a gangbang that lasts, say, 2 hours, with 1 hour to prep beforehand that's only a 3 hour commitment. At $150/per guy she'd still net $600. Two of these back to back (OK, stretching here a little bit) and she makes $1200 in roughly the same 8 hour timeframe that netted her $800.
Have I convinced any providers to go into the gangbang business? Originally Posted by mastermind238