No, it's simp like you who pay $400 to $600 for CBJ and no DFK. This is why prices will continue to increase and services will decrease. I simply have my own price limit and dignity. I've had better services and activities from women who charge less than the ones who have higher rates. The majority of the recent reviews on here and eccie are a bunch of dudes paying high prices, and they end up disappointed because the activities are denied or the female is too lazy to do shit. This is mostly true with women on rubrankings and the latinas on LC. Do your research and learn something.Providers these days ask for more money for the same time frame calling it inflation while their service level is the same if not worse. Been like that for years. If you know what you like from a session you pay for (activities, looks, age, ect.) and you relay that to the provider of today, since you do not accept "go with the flow and hope for the best", you are labeled as hard to please and even blacklisted.
A smart woman will charge at a lower rate than the average woman, have available activities, give excellent service, and ask for a positive review. This would result in hundreds of more clients, but most don't comprehend that. No, that's not how it works. Why? Because simps will pay higher prices for lower quality services, and the women will continue delude you gullible imbeciles. It has nothing to do with being "broke." Rich people don't waste money. They save it. Originally Posted by dormGE
I agree with you about what a smart provider does, but in their eyes, they think it is smart to charge more for less, not only because they are able to see less guys per month to meet their bills, but also, they always have schmucks encouraging them to do so yet those same guys probably cannot afford to see them in the first place. Defending a provider's rep whom you have not seen or met is like a provider who gives a reference (good or bad) of a hobbyist they have not seen or met.
Many times, I have read how providers have an off day with their service so you never know who is going to get the short straw. Since the provider does not have the where with all to contact a hobbyist who scheduled with her when she knows she cannot be at 100% (It really does not matter because the YMMV card is widely accepted and she will always get people to defend her shortcomings), I think that it should also be accepted that the hobbyist can say the ATM was having an off day and short her a Ben Franklin on her donation. I bet if the provider knew that could be possible, those off days would be much fewer and farther between!
