just one woman's opinion...but it ain't lonely where she is

I'll agree that the House is a given-- but the Senate? Not likely.


. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

The Fed rate increases and Saudi oil decrease are putting the Senate in play imho.

Although right now it looks like Dr Oz will lose and in Nevada it will flip Republican which is a net zero.

I'll agree that the House is a given-- but the Senate? Not likely.



I find it funny that some of the same who praise her now were quick to insult her when she was a Dem. Lets also not forget her voting history when exclaiming that she's a "patriot". She sided with the AOC crowd on practically every issue except Transgender issues. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

I know, I know, we can't take polling as the eventual outcome but there are at least 2 races where Republicans are in the lead or in the margin of error with the Democrat incumbent and it doesn't "appear" that any Republican incumbent is in deep trouble, correct me if I'm wrong. Democrats only have to lose one seat to lose the Senate.


Republicans don't need Walker and it would be a true miracle for him to win but my goodness, what would that say about Democrats in Georgia if Abrams and Warnock lose?


One seat! Nevada and Ohio IMHO will tell the tale of who wins.

I know, I know, we can't take polling as the eventual outcome but there are at least 2 races where Republicans are in the lead or in the margin of error with the Democrat incumbent and it doesn't "appear" that any Republican incumbent is in deep trouble, correct me if I'm wrong. Democrats only have to lose one seat to lose the Senate.


Republicans don't need Walker and it would be a true miracle for him to win but my goodness, what would that say about Democrats in Georgia if Abrams and Warnock lose?


One seat! Nevada and Ohio IMHO will tell the tale of who wins. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

You need to study up....Oz is probably gonna lose Pennsylvania.

And I do not think Walker will win Georgia but rising gas prices will help Walker. He'll if Walker can get all his kids to vote for him , his chances would greatly improve!

Topic is Tulsi leaving the wokeism of the dem party.

Good for her! Whatever she wants in her future I wish all the best for her.

I'll agree that the House is a given-- but the Senate? Not likely.



I find it funny that some of the same who praise her now were quick to insult her when she was a Dem. Lets also not forget her voting history when exclaiming that she's a "patriot". She sided with the AOC crowd on practically every issue except Transgender issues. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

Ha ha, sayin it doesn't make it true Grace.

Besides, I've supported her as the only decent democrat since 2016. If she had gotten the nomination, I may have voted for her over Trump. I did send her money too. So, when you make these inflammatory statements...know that you're lying. We know too.

Also Grace...the polls almost always favor democrats because they undercount republicans. Many races are "too close to call" which means they will probably go GOP. Also, those undecided...they usually go for the challenger by 65% to 30%. 5% salve their conscience by voting for a third party.

This goes for all of the dems here. Care to make a prediction?

It is common knowledge that Republicans either don't respond to polls or answer with something just to fuck with the pollsters. So in that regard, those saying we can't trust the polls are probably right but not in the direction Liberals think.


My prediction, every race with a Republican within the "margin of error", toss ups, will win because the Republican vote is being under-counted.

back to what tulsi said

do the dimocrats weaponize the security state to attack its opponents?

there is of evidence of that

are the dimocrats warmongers in the grip of the military industrial complex and have led us to the brink of nuclear war?

there is evidence of that

do the dimocrats attack the police in many ways by advocating defunding of the police and for enacting laws that prioritize criminals over ordinary americans.

there is evidence of that

do dimocrat party leaders not believe in freedom of speech, religion, and the right to bear arms? she says. “They try to censor speech they don’t like, labeling it as misinformation and hate speech.”

there is evidence of that


do dimocrats work hand-in-glove with corporate, for-profit media and Big Tech to smear and silence political opponents and anyone who dares to challenge their authority?

there is evidence of that

are dimocrats hostile to people of faith?

there is evidence of that

does the dimocrat party’s hatred of the second amendment and their increasing authoritarian instincts pose a serious threat to our freedoms?

there is evidence of that

have dimocrats betrayed mlk's dream that we are judged by the content of our character rather than the color of our skin? have dimocrats used identity politics to divide americans and propagate “anti-white” racism? she says “they have become the racists they claim to hate.”

there is evidence of that

what about the dimocrat party’s erasure of women by rejecting biological reality and demanding that many words, for instance like “mother” be replaced with “birthing person.” and that the word woman cannot be defined? or the use of "preferred pronouns"

there is evidence of that

are dimocrats putting women at risk “just to please biological men who claim to be women at any given moment”? do dimocrats take away opportunities from women in sports by allowing biological males to compete against them? she says, “behind the scenes … the biden administration is trying to change Title IX by a backdoor rule that would remove women and biological sex from the Title IX statute.”

there is evidence of that

are dimocrats trying force americans to comply with their denials of truth and their fringe ideas? she says. “they’re trying to regulate our speech and thought with the threat of punishment. … she says that in doing so, dimocrats are erasing objective truth. that’s really the issue here, she argues: “when one denies existence of objective truth, then there are no boundaries, no limits in society. truth becomes whatever those in power want it to be.”

she says the biden administration’s recent attempt to create a “ministry of truth,” which would control information americans read and share online. she says dimocrats’ objective is to “determine what is misinformation, what is true and what is not,” she continues, “their ideology is one of hate and divisiveness, rather than respect and love.”

there is evidence of that

Would she run as far away from you Trump lovers as humanly possible

There is evidence of that

Would she run as far away from you Trump lovers as humanly possible

There is evidence of that Originally Posted by WTF

I agree.

It would be interesting to see who in the Republican Party she would support

Keeping in mind, she might throw her hat in the ring.

Everybody also needs to remember that she is a Liberal. Just not a far left “Woke” Liberal.

I agree.

It would be interesting to see who in the Republican Party she would support

Keeping in mind, she might throw her hat in the ring.

Everybody also needs to remember that she is a Liberal. Just not a far left “Woke” Liberal. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Exactly!

jamie dimon is on the dimocrat case as well

he is criticizing bidens idiotic energy policy but theres more

its an arrow shot at the heart(less) middle of the dimocrat anti americanism

“This is the chance to get our act together and to solidify the Western, free, democratic, capitalist, free people, free movements, freedom of speech, free religion for the next century,” he added.

jamie dimon is on the dimocrat case as well

he is criticizing bidens idiotic energy policy but theres more

its an arrow shot at the heart(less) middle of the dimocrat anti americanism

“This is the chance to get our act together and to solidify the Western, free, democratic, capitalist, free people, free movements, freedom of speech, free religion for the next century,” he added. Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

What about free elections void of voter suppression, done on the weekend to encourage a higher % of voter participants?

Or how about we have freedom from religion or women have freedom of choice?