Where do we go from here?

Are you trying to tell me with a straight face that a fifteen minute appointment is screened beforehand?? Originally Posted by Blond_Lily

hahahahahaha

I have to admit...."Car Date/SW Scenario" is on my bucket list because I don't think inthebackofahatchbackonthepitc hersmoundofyourhighschoolbaseb allfield counts.

My thinkin, (and I could be wrong) a 15 min is a sw scenario in a notel room. the only difference being the net has replaced the street and the notel is booked beforehand. Some "dawg" too scared to drive the stroll and just wanting relief aka any available urinal will do. Could be wrong as I dunno much about sw scene.

When I started I offered 30 min (everybody else did) and decided fairly quickly that wasn't for me. BUT, you do need to recognize that there is a 30 minute "lunch" market...guys who literally cannot be gone over 60 minutes.

There are escorts and there are webscorts and there is a difference.

For 15 minute have one lady with four sisters who do not screen and will not get me arrested. If wrist is sprained have backup plan.

I've been screened for thirty minute sessions. Why not do so for fifteen minute ones? Impossible? Not worthwhile? Originally Posted by hyperkine

I think you're missing the whole point of this thread. Responsible ladies screen, the kind who aren't totally desperate for money. Irresponsible ladies don't screen--the kind who are hard up enough to offer 15 minute sessions. Make sense? If the lady cared enough to screen, she wouldn't do the 15 minute thing.

Ok, I follow your line of thought. But I disagree, and think it's a mistake to think that, absent any other information, the mere offer of a cheap, brief appointment reliably indicates that a provider is desperate or irresponsible.

Ok, I follow your line of thought. But I disagree, and think it's a mistake to think that, absent any other information, the mere offer of a cheap, brief appointment reliably indicates that a provider is desperate or irresponsible. Originally Posted by hyperkine

>> "absent any other information" << Strictly speaking.... you're correct.... but we have all seen enough evidence to predict the surroundings, other clientel, possible associations, possible reasons for needing the 'quick' fix of $ , and level of committment (or lack of) to the quality of service that many of us oldtimers prefer.

Trouble is.... the mere fact that she offers 15 minute blow & go quickies is enough to fairly reliably assume the rest! We're not saying it can't happen to a once high quality lady. I know two girls in particular, down in NOLA who I've known for a long time.... one for a very long time.... who are offering such "service".... and I can promise you, they are (for whatever reason) quite desperate!! At one time, they were top girls in the area! It happens.... and they should perhaps, be shared on the backchannel..... but not on a review site like we're trying to keep ECCIE to be! There are hobby guys who fall into the same gaps.... it happens.... but shouldn't be celebrated here!

There are other venues, which cater to the 15 minute , SW side of the hobby.... I only wish those types of customers would shop there.

Giz

Nope, I don't think so. I've had too many good 30/60/90/120 sessions with providers who also do quickies. None with Arkansas eccie women so far, but certainly some non-ecciers in Arkansas, plus providers in Seattle, Portland and Germany.

Go browse some over at tna. You'll find a good number of ads from reliable, attractive, skilled, well-reviewed providers who also happen to provide quickies.

Perhaps I am applying my non-AR experience and expecting too much, or the scene is just too different. Whatever.

I've been screened for thirty minute sessions. Why not do so for fifteen minute ones? Impossible? Not worthwhile? Originally Posted by hyperkine

Inquiring mind want to know. Two ladies called. 15 minute rate agreed to, no mention of screen. Humbly apologize for behavior.
Will not keep appointment. Duct tape and lead pipe returned to trunk of car... Perhaps next time.

Well.... honestly.... I can't argue about a quickie blowjob.... I've enjoyed them myself! And I've enjoyed them from quality ladies. But it hasn't been from advertising... and I didn't post a review of the pleasure!

But, I haven't posted a single review in over two years now.... so what do I know?

No Problem..... carry on....

Giz

Quickie = Cheapie. Me personally, when I am with a beautiful woman, I want more than 15 minutes. If I want to get off in 15 minutes or less, then my hand can do that trick for the cheap rate, though my left hand requires 30 minutes or more at twice the rate ... If I don't have the money to hobby then so be it, but can't stand the 15 minute rate stuff, just my two cents on that. Will I see a provider that offers that rate, well .... Sorry can't give that answer.

[QUOTE=HSP;356895]Quickie = Cheapie. Me personally, when I am with a beautiful woman, I want more than 15 minutes. If I want to get off in 15 minutes or less, then my hand can do that trick for the cheap rate, though my left hand requires 30 minutes or more at twice the rate ... If I don't have the money to hobby then so be it, but can't stand the 15 minute rate stuff, just my two cents on that. Will I see a provider that offers that rate, well .... Sorry can't give that


If Humble Inspector see Diogenes, will tell where honorable moderator may be found.
Most men are only as honorable as options. Of course, women figure out long before we do.

If I want to get off in 15 minutes or less, then my hand can do that trick for the cheap rate, though my left hand requires 30 minutes or more at twice the rate ... Originally Posted by HSP

Everybody put your hands together for HSP!

Everybody put your hands together for HSP! Originally Posted by Ginger Doll

Please excuse one hand already busy.

Sequel to best seller written by young economists entitled Freakanomics, SuperFreakonomics has wonderful economic disconnect (not comparison) between current day street walker on Chicago southside, (lowest of the low) and (i) example of early 1900s Chicago House provider in pre "progressive" prohibition era (outrageously financially successful but shut down by LE never to return in US) and (ii) current day entrepreuner provider named Ally in upscale Chicago that screens, and is discrete.

Conclusion was even though Ally thought her services, all hype aside, functionally no different than street type (even though price of services not comparable) she was as economically successful as 1900s era provider in luxury house and, in opinion of economists, defied economic laws (demand for her had price inelasticity) as she offered something much different than either street or 1900s in house provider: She was among other things a "Trophy wife for hire".

Doubt you can find trophy wife on cl or bp nor for 15 minutes anywhere. Oh yeah she also provided gfes which neither of other two categories do or did!

Conclusion was even though Ally thought her services, all hype aside, functionally no different than street type (even though price of services not comparable) she was as economically successful as 1900s era provider in luxury house and, in opinion of economists, defied economic laws (demand for her had price inelasticity) as she offered something much different than either street or 1900s in house provider: She was among other things a "Trophy wife for hire". Originally Posted by dddd1135

Damn my failing memory for not being able to find it, but I remember reading a piece by H.L. Mencken about the ladies in the highest class brothel in Baltimore back around the turn of the century.

Mencken gleefully noted that, contrary to the then conventional wisdom that "the wages of sin are death", the ladies of this brothel not only didn't die, they prospered, most (if not all) marrying some of the most prominent physicians, lawyers, and businessmen of Baltimore.

Less a "trophy wife for hire", and more a "trophy wife on spec".

Probably still happens. Ladies, play your cards right.

Cheers,

bcg

. . . in opinion of economists, defied economic laws (demand for her had price inelasticity) as she offered something much different . . . Originally Posted by dddd1135

Most economist I've ever met wouldn't understand it was a different type of elasiticity that improved her skills to the point that defied economic laws!


Since we're far off track where Mr. Chan started this thread, my satirical and sarcastic side couldn't help but kick in . . .