Wow, did I ever underestimate IB this time! Not thirty minutes but ONE minute to reply.You're wrong most of the time, and you're lying now when you deny agreeing with Sissy Chap's post even as his post contradicted what you said in your post, Old-THUMPER.
But the quality of his post is another matter--yes, I did agree with you on that point IB, because you were correct that time. I never said you were wrong on EVERY point, just most of them.
But I also did not say that SC won that argument, did I? No, I didn't--so instead of resting on your laurel you fall flat on your face yet again. And the saddest part, you had no reason to, but as everyone here knows that usually doesn't deter you.
As to pointing out where you were thrashed in argument after argument, I already explained why having that conversation with you is not worth the effort--you are genetically incapable of admitting you were wrong about anything.
However I will give you one more point in your favor--a bit of a backhanded complement, but still--at least you sometimes actually type out a new (though usually weird and delusional) thought. Unlike your brainless minion, the Wacko Kid, who thinks it is "humorous" to intentionally misquote someone. That is pure Beavis & Butthead territory and most Kids with a maturity level above 5th grade stopped doing that. But then again, it IS Wacko, and he has never been mistaken for being emotionally mature. Originally Posted by Old-T
Again, Old-THUMPER, revisit any of those old threads and point out where the evidence was on your side, Old=THUMPER.