The fucked up part about this thread? The ROS is now visible to everyone reading it. I'm sure this is EXACTLY what disp6 wanted. Originally Posted by wotbabyNo, it's not fucked up actually.
No, it's not fucked up actually.That's like one of those ironic comments to which one can retort, "I understand that, BUT" after which one has already said "I understand THAT, BUT" and then reply back and forth with the same line every time.
it's not a review. technically it should be an alert. But it wasn't written that way.
SINCE, it's not actually a review, it was moved to Co-ed. SINCE, it's not a review the entire report should be visible.
You want to make good choices, here is info to help you do that.
Peace
PK Originally Posted by Loki Pk
That's like one of those ironic comments to which one can retort, "I understand that, BUT" after which one has already said "I understand THAT, BUT" and then reply back and forth with the same line every time.I agree. The ROS should have been deleted, as a courtesy. Or, at least put in as a private comment.....
Regardless, if it were my review I'd want the ROS deleted or privatized immediately. But I'm not disp6.
That's like one of those ironic comments to which one can retort, "I understand that, BUT" after which one has already said "I understand THAT, BUT" and then reply back and forth with the same line every time.
Regardless, if it were my review I'd want the ROS deleted or privatized immediately. But I'm not disp6.
I agree. The ROS should have been deleted, as a courtesy. Or, at least put in as a private comment.....
elg........ Originally Posted by elghund
shhhhhh Originally Posted by offshoredrilling
I agree. The ROS should have been deleted, as a courtesy. Or, at least put in as a private comment.....Upon further review and modtard discussion, I was wrong to pull the private tags on the Rest of Story portion on this report.
elg........ Originally Posted by elghund
So it doesn't qualify as a review but the same rules apply as a 'real' review? Shouldn't COED rules apply since its now a COED thread?FWIW, it's not my whim. And at the risk of sounding redundant, I agree with you.
LOL. Holy whim on this site.
Frankly I dont understand the review rules here with this 'no activity' thing. This review is far more valuable than a review with reported 'activities' taken place.
Isn't this a prime example of what review is? The OP had a business arrangement with a 'business' and that business burned him. Its exactly the thing that should be reviewed... IJS. Originally Posted by ElleW
So it doesn't qualify as a review but the same rules apply as a 'real' review? Shouldn't COED rules apply since its now a COED thread? Originally Posted by ElleWNo. No. You would be incorrect on both points.
Frankly I dont understand the review rules here with this 'no activity' thing. This review is far more valuable than a review with reported 'activities' taken place. Originally Posted by ElleWIt's actually really simple. If no pay for play activities occur, then it is not a review, and it gets moved to co-ed, where the provider can reply to the thread if she wants to, unlike the review forums, where she is prohibited from commenting. The ROS info doesn't get revealed, no matter where it gets moved to. The provider doesn't get to see that information when it's in the review forum, she still doesn't get to see it when it gets moved to the co-ed forum.
Upon further review and modtard discussion, I was wrong to pull the private tags on the Rest of Story portion on this report.
I have fixed that error and you may all go on about your business of busting my balls for the foreseeable future.
Carry-on
Peace
PK Originally Posted by Loki Pk
