Teenagers?

The incursion of the nanny-state mind set into this adult environment is troubling.

At what point is it enough? There are plenty of ladies that pass for 5-10 years older or younger than their real age. Hooktard math has never had a linear element.

The ladies that respond have a conflict of interest due to competition. When ever a new "flavor of the month" shows up, it siphons off available hobby funds from the masses.

This lifestyle is a series of risks, and it is up to the individual to manage those risks in a way they are comfortable with. If you want to avoid all legal possibilities, then you need to stay out of the hobby completely.

This lifestyle is a series of risks, and it is up to the individual to manage those risks in a way they are comfortable with. If you want to avoid all legal possibilities, then you need to stay out of the hobby completely. Originally Posted by texasjohn1965

Touche`

Some here may have miss-understood my point. I may not have stated my concerns clearly, and for that I apologize.

Sure, everyone may hobby and/or provide as they choose. Everytining bears a risk and we all must face the risks. All may choose their own path in the hobby world—and they are welcome to do their own thing.

My remarks and suggestions were intended to prevent ECCIE from becoming a target for LE—OK, I know they probably already monitor the site. But if ECCIE becomes a place known to provide a venue where you can connect with underage girls, the site will come under active attack . . .and we will all l ose out. Recall what happened to Craig's List. Right now, BP is in the crosshairs —CCIE could be snext in line.

Some here may have miss-understood my point. I may not have stated my concerns clearly, and for that I apologize.

Sure, everyone may hobby and/or provide as they choose. Everytining bears a risk and we all must face the risks. All may choose their own path in the hobby world—and they are welcome to do their own thing.

My remarks and suggestions were intended to prevent ECCIE from becoming a target for LE—OK, I know they probably already monitor the site. But if ECCIE becomes a place known to provide a venue where you can connect with underage girls, the site will come under active attack . . .and we will all l ose out. Recall what happened to Craig's List. Right now, BP is in the crosshairs —CCIE could be snext in line. Originally Posted by ICU 812

Exactly and that is the issue.

I'm waiting for the 1st review to pop up with Chris Hansen in it. Then I'm out.... ijs

When I first started on this board I was 19 and I didn't have any problems with guys thinking I was younger than that. The only problem I still get about my age is my email address because it says 17, but I mean come on if those girls are well reviewed then there shouldn't be any problem with scheduling with them. If they are new then just wait until someone else sees them if you're so paranoid about it.

I'm waiting for the 1st review to pop up with Chris Hansen in it. Then I'm out.... ijs Originally Posted by Dorian Gray

Omg that is the last thing we need is a Chris Hansen news report on these frikkin boards. I can just see it now he does his under cover thing using a BP lady ad and making it appear like she has great reviews, then the guys set it up go in, and boom busted. What a nightmare that would be for a guy(s).

Rarely do the really young providers have the abilities and attitude that makes a session really memorable for me.

I can think of several ladies that are reviewed on this board ALL the time that started when they were 18 and have given excellent service throughout.

I agree that there are great providers that started in their legal teens. But this thread is not about the providers nor is it about the hobbyists.

This thread is about the FUTURE of ECIE where we all exchange information.

My remarks and suggestions were intended to prevent ECCIE from becoming a target for Law Enforcement—OK, I know they probably already monitor the site.

But if ECCIE ever becomes widely known as a place where you can arrange to have sex with underage girls, the site will come under active attack by law enforcement and the news media. The result will be that we will all lose out.

Recall what happened to Craig's List. Right now, Back Page is in the crosshairs —ECCIE will be snext in line.

The incursion of the nanny-state mind set into this adult environment is troubling.

At what point is it enough? There are plenty of ladies that pass for 5-10 years older or younger than their real age. Hooktard math has never had a linear element.

The ladies that respond have a conflict of interest due to competition. When ever a new "flavor of the month" shows up, it siphons off available hobby funds from the masses.

This lifestyle is a series of risks, and it is up to the individual to manage those risks in a way they are comfortable with. If you want to avoid all legal possibilities, then you need to stay out of the hobby completely. Originally Posted by texasjohn1965

Wow, what a buzz kill.

What the fuck...how many times does this have to be said?

They have to confirm that they're 18 when they log in. Them clicking an "I'm 21" box doesn't mean they're not a minor any more than an "I'm 18" box. None of them are advertising as underage. The board isn't promoting an underage girls, it specifically prohibits them. You can't prove that a single provider here on this board is under 18. You can't recall a single instance of any provider being kicked off the board for being under 18.

What's the damn problem here?

Is this guy a community organizer? Quannel X, is that you?

Eccie is what it is, LE knows it, we know it, the paper knows it, as does the news programs.
If anyone is looking for underage girls, they will have much better luck in the mexican cantinas than they will on eccie.

I don't believe that St. C is looking for marketing/consulting help, but you keep beating that dead horse.


If you need a cause to champion, start protesting all the ladies offering bbcr. They all do it with someone, and you never know what they are passing around. Or you could worry about your own ILLEGAL activities, and protect yourself. Most of us don't need a nanny to protect us, and if you do, then you really should go back to t-ball for your own safety.

We're all too dumb to recognize a minor when we see one, so thank god icu 812 is here with his new set of rules to save us from our own ignorance.

Will someone please hijack this thread...

Dumbest set of rules ive ever heard..you deserve to be punched in the throat