Mueller investigating Trump for obstruction of justice, Washington Post reports

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump

They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. Nice

5:55 AM - 15 Jun 2017

8,365 8,365 Retweets 26,694 26,694 likes

As the head of the executive branch of our government, who is ultimately responsible for budgetary matters and efficient use of resources within the executive branch, the POTUS can make suggestions to "move on" when there is an alleged criminal "investigation" that has been ongoing for almost a year (begun in the prior administration) and NOTHING has been uncovered indicating a crime has been committed.

But that's not what Comey said Trump said! Comey didn't say Trump told him to drop the "investigation" .... even giving Comey's words the worst interpretation for Trump. But THAT IS WHAT COMEY DID FOR HILLARYNOMORE!!!!

Congress will not impeach.

Of course Trump was trying to stop the investigation. He fired the top guy investigating! But let's be real...they are not going to impeach Trump. Imho Originally Posted by WTF

That's the cold hard truth that some of these dummies can't seem to understand. I saw the same pattern during the Obama administration over and over again. These so called leaders of ours seem to walk between the raindrops.

Jim

Wholesale deflection.
Now you think blogs are credible sources.
No surprise though. Youtube has always been your "go to" source.

Better put on those dancing shoes and some tight gloves. You're going to be dancing from blog to blog, grasping at every straw to delay the inevitable.

You'll claim it's all lies.

LYNCH LYNCH!!!!


Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Did you think he was going to admit anything in a tweet like he did on TV?
trump is a pathological liar. Untruthful 65-70% of the time.
You post bullshit 65-70% of the time. Of course you believe him.

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump

They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. Nice

5:55 AM - 15 Jun 2017

8,365 8,365 Retweets 26,694 26,694 likes





Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

The real headline should be 'Munchie falls for FAKE NEWS... AGAIN!'

From the Washington Post article (caught in many lies lately)...

"Five people briefed on the interview requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly"

Anonymous sources = "We made this shit up."

Get back to us when you have a verifiable source.

Looks official now.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/14/politi...ump/index.html
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You got a more reliable source than the Post? They've been wrong so often only fools take them seriously.

It appears that some ignorant posters on here believe that an "investigation" is tantamount to a conviction of guilt. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Here is the Washington Time's reporting concerning Muller's initial Probable Cause for the Investigation.........."the Washington Times is reporting that a unnamed source knows an assistant janitor who is friends with the brother in law of the bartender at a local bar frequented by an intern in the justice department who overheard a conversation in the bathroom that indicated that Special Council Mueller will look into whether a private conversation between President Trump and James Comey made Comey uncomfortable".

Hell, get a cell in Levenworth ready.

Hopefully very soon the leakers will be discharged and branded as such so as to prevent them from ever again being in any position in which they have access to "sensitive" and "private" information about people and activities......after they are released from prison and placed on supervision for a sufficient period of time so they can't even remember their names.

They could be offered an "alternative" to prosecution: Provided with Republican baseball uniforms and taken to the local baseball diamond to continue practicing until they are "ready" for other disposition. Prepaid by them, of course.

It appears that some ignorant posters on here believe that an "investigation" is tantamount to a conviction of guilt. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Remember when being under investigation by the FBI was a disqualifying thing.


http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_58...b0ec9d29de2c1e



.

As the head of the executive branch of our government, who is ultimately responsible for budgetary matters and efficient use of resources within the executive branch, the POTUS can make suggestions to "move on" when there is an alleged criminal "investigation" that has been ongoing for almost a year (begun in the prior administration) and NOTHING has been uncovered indicating a crime has been committed.

! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Hillary was under investigation by the Benghazi committee for two years did not see anybody worried about budgetary commitments at that time!

You really need to stfu...

You already have. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Not hardly. It's just getting good.

The "DOJ Brass" know better, and, if they don't, they should be fired...summarily. The AG approves prosecutions and nonprosecutions....not "Special Counsel"! ... which must then be signed off by a Judge with jurisdiction over the potential prosecution. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I forget. Who was it that recused themselves? Oh yeah, the AG.
He left the guy in charge who appointed the special prosecutor.

You're not an authority on any of this. You're just flapping your gums. Which is okay because you're harmless, hapless, and clueless.

You got a more reliable source than the Post? They've been wrong so often only fools take them seriously. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...port-says.html

How about fox?

If Comey is down and out, He's got a Friend!...


Russian President Vladimir Putin said former FBI Director James Comey's claim that he gave his account of a conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump to a friend to leak to the media is "odd."

If you don't read his Tweets,
You can't have any PUTIN!

How can you have any PUTIN
If you don't read his Tweets?


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!