*sigh*.....really?....My Rebuttle

What are we listing now?!

Apparently, PW White Knights!

dont worry berk you have so many awesome reviews that this dip shit and his review wont make one bit of a difference. neither will the comments from any other assholes, they would have never been potential clients anyway because they are afraid intimidated by a woman who speaks her mind and they dont like women who dont do what they say, whenever they say.

some of u do not understand the shit we have to deal with and that this is our "job" its how we pay bills and feed ourselves and in some cases our families. we have to have the image of a provider being beaten and robbed in our heads and still put on a perfect session. lets see how hard your dick would stay if you had to fuck some big fat lady with scabs all over her body...

we are not robots!

i am done ranting now sorry but cowboyty.....

I have seen this client several several times over the past year and a half. He couldn't be any nicer. He is always a gentlemen and his very clean when I see him. Just wanted to say my two cents. I guess it was a misfortunate from the get go?

Traci and Jules, I'm not going to lower myself to your levels and start calling you names.

I thought I would encounter more class on the board. Tara Evans gives me hope.

Don't judge people by a couple of providers, everybody has the right to speak on this board

Simply put, she could have said no to the 2nd visit, particularly given the outcome of the 1st visit. Either way, the classless rant here was unnecessary..after all, she does have a ton of good reviews, right?

ty this had nothing to do with you and you couldn't help but to stir the pot. also note that this session took place LAST YEAR so why wait all this time to post a review? hell you might be the said reviewer under a uc handle for all we know. why are you so interested?

i honestly think there should be a 30day review policy

and yes she could have said no to the second visit, maybe she really needed the money we dont know.... my point is so what if she speaks her mind? when you have awesome reviews and someone posts a bad one that could hurt our business a great deal so of course we get scared and defend ourselves. bottom line she is hot and a great fuck is that not what you guys are here for?

Ditto, Jules....

I have no dog in this hunt, but I'd say the same thing to one of the guys if he came on here here insulting one of the ladies needlessly...cross 'em off your list and and move on. Simple stuff.

Don't judge people by a couple of providers, everybody has the right to speak on this board Originally Posted by MustangRider

I agree that they have a right to speak, although they seem to think that I don't. But I must admit that Traci was kind in her first post. I did appreciate that. I also appreciated the guys who defended my right to an opinion.

From what I can read right now, I can't see anything so bad other than Berk being late, which she admits she runs late. It was shitty of him to wait so long to post a review though.

sigh

From what I can read right now, I can't see anything so bad other than Berk being late, which she admits she runs late. It was shitty of him to wait so long to post a review though. Originally Posted by Dannie

It's actually a mild review. Too bad the ladies can't read it. It's freaking ironic that she made this post given the reason he gave for not recommending her.

The date on the review is mid-January so that doesn't seem too long.

I've always liked Berk and her wit and straightforward attitude on the boards, but outting a guy's profession on a public board is just wrong - way out of line.

i honestly think there should be a 30day review policy Originally Posted by Jules Jaguar

Review posted mid-February, and states the appointment was in mid-January. Berkleigh states that it was in December. *shrug* Timeliness may depend on which.

and yes she could have said no to the second visit, maybe she really needed the money we dont know.... Originally Posted by Jules Jaguar

I understand the economic pressures, but I would humbly suggest that (in general, not specifically about this situation) ladies not see someone if they have reason to believe that they won't be able to give it their best. Or under circumstances with a significant risk of being significantly late. Short-term gain, but over time it can detract from reputation.

bottom line she is hot and a great fuck is that not what you guys are here for? Originally Posted by Jules Jaguar

Umm, not always the only relevant factor in our choice. At least, not for everyone.

s so what if she speaks her mind? when you have awesome reviews and someone posts a bad one that could hurt our business a great deal so of course we get scared and defend ourselves. Originally Posted by Jules Jaguar

I've always supported the ladies' right to respond to a review. I think they probably don't do it as much as they should. But it's important to do it well, and most do not. When you're scared and feeling defensive is the worst time to compose and post a rebuttal. An emotional response is likely to do more harm than good, whereas putting together a well-thought-out and calm response can improve the reputation much more than the negative review hurt it. Some prospective clients are interested in ladies' personalities and attitudes as well as how they look and how they fuck. A well-written rebuttal can demonstrate positive aspects of personality and attitude and character that were may not have been evident before; sometimes a difficult situation brings out who you are more than ordinary situations do.

Of course, the well-thought-out, calm, and well-written rebuttals are in the minority, because most ladies respond immediately and emotionally. If I were in their position, perhaps I would as well. (Don't feel compelled to write a review of me to test my response, though. ) But when I read an incoherent, angry, mean-spirited response (again, I'm talking generally here, not characterizing the opening post), it reduces my interest in the lady. Spunky, opinionated, and standing up for herself are positive attributes, but other aspects may overwhelm that.

At the same time, that's for everyone to judge for themselves, so I would likely not comment to provide my evaluation of a specific response. (As opposed to pontificating and offering unsolicited and unwanted advice in general, as I'm doing here.) Ditto if it were, in my opinion, a well-done response. I have an opinion, sure, but there's no real benefit from sharing it. Public observations like that would be as meaningless as my expressing whether I would or would not want to see a particular lady. What good does that do, to tell everyone that a lady whom I've never seen is now either added to my list or removed from it? Who gives a shit? Everyone decides that sort of thing for themselves, and anyone who decided to see a lady or not (or to criticize or not a response like above) based on my opinion . . . well, be a man, make up your own mind. So, regardless of my opinion of the original post, I would normally not comment to criticize it or praise it.

Except, in this particular situation, to point out that it did come close a place or two to publicly disclosing personal information about a client that could aid a lurker in identifying him. Short of posting his real name or phone number, but still (arguably) indiscreet. Sometimes identifying information is appropriate, in cases of true alert-worthy behavior, but I think the consensus of the P4P community is that it would be inappropriate for something as trivial as a negative review. You all can make the call for yourselves about whether this did or did not cross the line. I'm sure there will be some on both sides of that question. But I'll close this (unsolicited and unwanted advice, I know) by suggesting to the ladies that indiscretion is the third rail of P4P; be very, very careful about staying far away from anything that might be considered as useful in identifying someone's real world identify. Especially in the heat of the moment when you're angry.

OK, y'all can now post a rebuttal to my comments.