TUESDAY ELECTION TAKEAWAY ????

The mainstream may make up 75% of the GOP (where did you get your numbers?) but nearly 100% of the Tea Party people get out and vote. A loud, active minority can beat a majority if the majority stays home like they did in Virginia. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You truly are the Mad Hatter. Were you drunk or high when you posted this?

Check last Wednesday's papers chucklehead. McCauliffe won....he didn't "do badly." He is now the governor of the state of Virginia. Suck on it.

Got this post saved, for future reference. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Don't worry he won't remember, I had to remind him to wipe off his chin the last time he blew me.

A big chunk of the single women voter advantage is women who are non-white; this group doesn't vote Democrat based on abortion; they vote for more government subsidies and expanded government safety nets.

The social conservative issues didn't cause Cuccinelli to lose. It was McAuliffe's $35 million financial advantage !

McAuliffe got 62% of single women voters, Cucinelli got 29%. I don't expect that this will mean anything to you, but the dems have it figured out. Originally Posted by nwarounder

You truly are the Mad Hatter. Were you drunk or high when you posted this?

Check last Wednesday's papers chucklehead. McCauliffe won....he didn't "do badly." He is now the governor of the state of Virginia. Suck on it. Originally Posted by timpage

A growing number of liberal commentators disagrees with you. Just deal with it.

A big chunk of the single women voter advantage is women who are non-white; this group doesn't vote Democrat based on abortion; they vote for more government subsidies and expanded government safety nets.

The social conservative issues didn't cause Cuccinelli to lose. It was McAuliffe's $35 million financial advantage ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway

No scenario exists where you won't be able to come up with some sort of an excuse. Bottom line: he lost when he should have won going away. Not only did he lose, he was behind the entire time. People are sick of you and your like-minded moron buddies' divisive, hateful, non-inclusive our-way-or-the-highway attitude which you present and justify with the self-serving "principled conservative" term. I;m sure it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside to believe that you are a an unbending man of principled steel but, guess what? That aint what makes the world work you clueless jackass.

A growing number of liberal commentators disagrees with you. Just deal with it. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Which liberal commentators disagree with the point I am trying to make Professor? With that point being, McAuliffe won, your Tea Party darling lost. All of the stupid and clueless commentary you can offer will not change that fact. Deal with that you inarticulate boneheaded dunce.

A big chunk of the single women voter advantage is women who are non-white; this group doesn't vote Democrat based on abortion; they vote for more government subsidies and expanded government safety nets.

The social conservative issues didn't cause Cuccinelli to lose. It was McAuliffe's $35 million financial advantage ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Any support for your statement that non-white women vote for democrats because of government subsidies and expanded government safety nets? Aware of the existence of any support for the assertion that poor white trash votes republican at the same time they receive government subsidies and expanded government safety nets.?

There not a single piece of reliable evidence that supports your absurd assertions. It's nothing but sour grapes tinged with your usual race-baiting bullshit that you make up when the shortcomings of your candidates are exposed by voters at the polls. Your people don't have any ideas motherfucker. Your people's platform is all about hating on other people. The entire premise of the Republican position has become to attack and tear down rather than offer a solution to any problem that currently faces the American people. It's why you're doomed.

Just like the argument you make here. It has to be an insult and an attack on a segment of the population, black of course, who you are required to deem lazy miscreants who caused your terrible candidate to lose to somebody who, by all accounts, should not have been a viable candidate in Virginia politics.

You're stupid and you're a bad person and you don't argue very well.

Go fuck yourself.

A big chunk of the single women voter advantage is women who are non-white; this group doesn't vote Democrat based on abortion; they vote for more government subsidies and expanded government safety nets.

The social conservative issues didn't cause Cuccinelli to lose. It was McAuliffe's $35 million financial advantage ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway

So if they were going to vote dem regardless, how would more money have helped? Do you really think money can sway people's religious beliefs? I don't get that logic, at all.

Which liberal commentators disagree with the point I am trying to make Professor? With that point being, McAuliffe won, your Tea Party darling lost. All of the stupid and clueless commentary you can offer will not change that fact. Deal with that you inarticulate boneheaded dunce. Originally Posted by timpage

You really have a problem with understanding. It is not the fact that the dem won and the Tea party guy lost, it was the fact that a major player in the democratic party ALMOST lost to essentially a third party candidate. That is what is scaring some democrats. It is also scaring republicans. That the Tea party can almost do elections without GOP support. If the corrupt bought and paid for Libertarian had not been there then you would be hearing about the first Tea Party governor.

You really have a problem with understanding. It is not the fact that the dem won and the Tea party guy lost, it was the fact that a major player in the democratic party ALMOST lost to essentially a third party candidate. That is what is scaring some democrats. It is also scaring republicans. That the Tea party can almost do elections without GOP support. If the corrupt bought and paid for Libertarian had not been there then you would be hearing about the first Tea Party governor. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

almost lost


apparently almost is good enough for losers

Don't worry he won't remember, I had to remind him to wipe off his chin the last time he blew me. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

HOMO EROTIC FANTASY MIKE THE INBREED CHIMP SUCKS HIS OWN DICK...

I love the way you hum as you are doing me Whiffy.

The Virginia election was a "get out the vote" race; a record number of voters turned out. With financial help from the national GOP, Cucinelli would have been able to equal the McAuliffe ground game and overcome the vote-split caused by the phony Libertarian candidate.

The blame for the loss is on the National GOP who threw their financial support behind Christi; and ignored the Virginia race. Cucinelli did very well in running an "against the odds" campaign to win. And Christi should have helped another Republican governor candidate....but he didn't. Christi is a marked man with the Tea Party.

The Virginia election was a "get out the vote" race; a record number of voters turned out. With financial help from the national GOP, Cucinelli would have been able to equal the McAuliffe ground game and overcome the vote-split caused by the phony Libertarian candidate.

The blame for the loss is on the National GOP who threw their financial support behind Christi; and ignored the Virginia race. Cucinelli did very well in running an "against the odds" campaign to win. And Christi should have helped another Republican governor candidate....but he didn't. Christi is a marked man with the Tea Party. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

The more Republicans who are "marked men/women" by the Tea Party, the better. It hands almost every election where that occurs to the Democrats. Fucking dunce. Best case scenario for the national election in 2016 is Christie as the GOP candidate and you loons nominating some third party tea whacker to siphon votes away from Christie. Between you idiots and the Libertarian loons, whoever the Dem nominee turns out to be will win in a walk.

But, your insane "principles" will be intact and you can spend the next 4 years moaning and pissing and complaining and acting like the bitch you are.....

The Virginia election was a "get out the vote" race; a record number of voters turned out. With financial help from the national GOP, Cucinelli would have been able to equal the McAuliffe ground game and overcome the vote-split caused by the phony Libertarian candidate.

The blame for the loss is on the National GOP who threw their financial support behind Christi; and ignored the Virginia race. Cucinelli did very well in running an "against the odds" campaign to win. And Christi should have helped another Republican governor candidate....but he didn't. Christi is a marked man with the Tea Party. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

didn't you get the memo ?

TP'ers have a 21% approval rating.

translation:

they may win a few elections in states or counties that have a steady supply of idiots, but outside of that they are basically dead in the water and anchors around the neck of/to the republicans. With a rating like that the GOP was smart enough to throw their $$ at a candidate with a brain and some public appeal... all the $$ in the country wouldn't have bought Crazy Cooch the women's vote.