The sortie number is kinda meaningless without a breakdown. Originally Posted by gnadflyHere's a sample "breakdown" ....
Just glad these guys weren't traveling across the fairway ...
.. the little goofball would be screaming ...... "FORE"!!!
Quite effective, hasn't it been?Let us look at the big picture...
How many Christians were captured yesterday?
But Obaminable ain't Bush. Originally Posted by LexusLover
[SIZE=3]You do understand what your support for that invasion has unleashed? Originally Posted by WTFIf I actually believed your posts it would make me feel omnipotent.
If I actually believed your posts it would make me feel omnipotent.Clinton isn't our god.
Here's the beginning of the support for the 2003 invasion ...
http://www.hrw.org/reports/1991/iraq/
"March 11, 1991: WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE IRAQI KURDS?"
Later on YOUR FAVORITE made the following statement:
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stori...s/clinton.html
16Dec98
"The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world.
"The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people. Bringing change in Baghdad will take time and effort. We will strengthen our engagement with the full range of Iraqi opposition forces and work with them effectively and prudently."
Bill Clinton
Have a nice day junior. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Clinton isn't our god. Originally Posted by UnderConstructionThere may be some debate about it, but I think she would more than likely fall into the "goddess" column, but only on a gender analysis (the debatable part) and clearly not in the "goddess" column based on what is sometimes considered to be a gorgeous female, which she clearly is not.
There may be some debate about it, but I think she would more than likely fall into the "goddess" column, but only on a gender analysis (the debatable part) and clearly not in the "goddess" column based on what is sometimes considered to be a gorgeous female, which she clearly is not.I was referencing bill... And for someone who hangs out on a hooker site, you sure begrudge a guy getting laid.
Bill now knows what is a "goddess" based on his introduction to DNA and the value of a lady swallowing. Which may be relevant to his decision making back in those days. Originally Posted by LexusLover
I was referencing bill... And for someone who hangs out on a hooker site, you sure begrudge a guy getting laid. Originally Posted by UnderConstructionAre you talking about the President of the United States getting laid?
I could post pictures of W saluting the troops while carrying his dog, ..... Originally Posted by UnderConstruction...some folks take care of their dogs...
Are you talking about the President of the United States getting laid?Where did I excuse him for being a sexual predator? Jesus, if you can't find it I guess you just make shit up.
Did Bill get "laid" while he was occupying the White House?
I recall him announcing something like: "I did not have sex with that woman."
Also, I recall his then wife proclaiming the accusation that he did "have sex with that woman" was a "Great Right Wing Conspiracy"! Furthermore, ...
I recall "Bill" having testified under oath in a Federal court discovery proceeding that he did not have sex with that "other" woman, which turned out to be a lie, and perjury, as determined by the United States District Judge presiding over the case, who reported the information to the Arkansas state bar association, which resulted in "Bill" losing his law license for perjury.
I have never heard of an attorney being disbarred or losing his law license for having consensual sex with a nonclient. I have heard of lawyers losing their law license for committing perjury, though, and other felonies.
Bill Clinton as a governor of Arkansas and President of the United States was a sexual predator who preyed on subordinate females by using his office to lure them into his little web of narcissistic infidelity. In the private sector, as a CEO, he would have been terminated and/or been the subject of a sexual harassment complaint with substantial punitive damages.
But guys like you give him a "pass" by excusing his behavior as being "normal"!
And his dumbass, equally narcissistic spouse .....
..............makes excuses for him for her own gains and political ambitions.
What's your purpose in making excuses for him being a sexual predator? Originally Posted by LexusLover