Democrats plan civil war

The duty, actually.

Thank you Grace- for your expressed inability to understand what others comprehend.

The post was CUOMO.

Who understands nothing except his Marxist playbook from Comrade Xi!

Perhaps a reading comprehension course???
Thank You.

Thank you Grace- for your expressed inability to understand what others comprehend.

The post was CUOMO.

Who understands nothing except his Marxist playbook from Comrade Xi!

Perhaps a reading comprehension course???
Thank You. Originally Posted by oeb11

A "virtual" one at that!

Thank you Grace- for your expressed inability to understand what others comprehend.

The post was CUOMO.

Who understands nothing except his Marxist playbook from Comrade Xi!

Perhaps a reading comprehension course???
Thank You. Originally Posted by oeb11

Is it possible for yous to be any less fucking rude, Ramboebsy?

Typical WSND!

I'm thinking you don't comprehend that being the Commander in Chief only goes so far. If he ever decided to go rogue-- every last member of the Armed Forces has the right to refuse an unlawful order. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

In the military the Enlisted Soldier swears to obey the orders of the President but Officers do not.

Most of you guys are clueless
Section 1385 of Title 18 (usc)
Is taught to every officer in every branch of mil.
There's a few exceptions. But, Trump can't simply walk troops accross the GWB. Grace is correct.
And Cuomo is turning into a whinebaby.

In the military the Enlisted Soldier swears to obey the orders of the President but Officers do not. Originally Posted by theotherguy1

Officer's oath is to the Constitution. the Constitution states that the President is Commander in Chief. all serving officers are required to obey the Commander in Chief according to the Constitution.


(Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God."

Article 90 of the UCMJ-- they're required to follow LAWFUL orders.


It has already been upheld that "I was just following orders" is not a defense if you knew the orders to be unlawful.

Officer's oath is to the Constitution. the Constitution states that the President is Commander in Chief. all serving officers are required to obey the Commander in Chief according to the Constitution.


(Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God."

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

how long to leave female betta with male

Oh I'm so sick of the nattering about the bone spurs. You show me a man who came from wealth during Vietnam.. and I'll show you a man whose daddy bought him out of having to go and serve. These days-- most of our people who run for office come from money and got out of serving. Biden got 5 deferments, too.

His mind, body and sole has been consumed with the hatred of another man

No military person in his/her right mind would obey or respect the bone spur in chief. They laugh n make fun of him too.

I don't think either blacks killed by police or the protests and rioting that BLM caused are huge deals. The Democrats and the Republicans are just using this to bash each other. Compared to traffic accidents, everyday homicides, cancer, heart disease, and a fucked up criminal justice system (which screws blacks disproportionately more than whites), this stuff is a pretty minor problem.
Originally Posted by Tiny

I couldn't disagree more that the rioting by BLM and Antifa aren't big deals compared to the other things you listed. There is circumstantial evidence ( we won't know the full meaning till election week or month, can't say day any more ) that this rioting could be changing minds on who Americans vote for. There is no evidence of any kind that I am aware of that people will consider traffic accidents, everyday homicides ( sure doesn't seem to effect the voters in Chicago ) cancer or heart disease, before they decide who to vote for. A fucked up criminal justice system yes but Trump didn't install the fucked up criminal justice system but the two Democrats running sure as hell played a major part on many more persons of color going to jail than Trump who has successfully put in place reforms that have actually gotten Blacks released from jail if the media was honest enough to report it.


And while all this violence might be a minor problem now ( I disagree ) what if it doesn't stop? When the Black guy in Rochester died, what did we all say in unison "oh fuck, not another one"! Right? Do we think if Biden is elected that cops will stop shooting Black men which would have to stop for the riots to stop, right? So if the riots don't stop because Black men will continue to be shot, crime isn't going to stop,on that you can bet the house, it will not be a minor problem when White militias start squaring off against Black militias. Think that just might be a major problem or are you going to tell me that will not, can not happen?


I've said it before and I'll say it again, this violence may just be the number one issue ahead of the economy and Covid come November. It may be a very big deal indeed.

What are these "unlawful orders" we are speculating about?

ts is just trolling - and stirring the pot.

Just typical of a master 'Troll" baiter.