Did you read Ender's post? Originally Posted by boardmanDid you read mine?
We are suspicious folkNo, it doesn't. So if Brook Wild has 10 reviews in 2 weeks instead of 5 weeks, that would scare you away......how?
It doesn't have anything to do with what we expect of the provider. It has everything to do with what we have come to expect from elle.
Make sense now?
Did you read mine?Some of the statements you have made here and elsewhere on the Houston boards appear to be simply confrontational in nature so I don't really know if your are serious or just trying to start shit. My gut and your sig line tell me it's the latter. I will assume for the sake of argument that you are serious.
No, it doesn't. So if Brook Wild has 10 reviews in 2 weeks instead of 5 weeks, that would scare you away......how? Originally Posted by Doove
Did you read mine?At the risk of breaking your sig line rule #4,
No, it doesn't. So if Brook Wild has 10 reviews in 2 weeks instead of 5 weeks, that would scare you away......how? Originally Posted by Doove
Some of the statements you have made here and elsewhere on the Houston boards appear to be simply confrontational in nature Originally Posted by boardmanJust tryin' to fit in.
Seems Houston people can dish it out pretty good, but some of 'em seem to pretty easily get their panties in a bunch when on the other end of it. so I don't really know if your are serious or just trying to start shit.More often than not, a little bit of both.
Brooke is a known commodity. Using her in this example isn't relevant to the topic as I see it.Yes, it is. The original post didn't pose the question only in the context of unknown ladies. If you can read his mind better than i, all the power to ya. I just responded based on the literal wording of the question.
However, yes if her reviews increased that dramatically I would have suspicions. Stranger things have happened.So it would affect your decision making. So why say it's not relevant?
Unless you've lived either first hand or vicariously through this board through Black Tuesday and Last Christmas and all the implications those events have had on our hobby lifestyle you can't possibly understand our suspicious nature.Forgive me for being from NY and not knowing the specifics. I can only assume, from your suggesting those matters are relevant to the points you're trying to make, that peopLE targeted the more well known and popular providers. And proceeded to also use them as bait to go after clients. Otherwise i fail to see how one girl having more reviews than another poses more of a risk to herself or anyone else.
To question it in such a manner as yours is insulting, rude and quite frankly makes you look uninformed or lacking of respect for your bros.Oh please. I'll cop to the uninformed accusation, but my point is one you can/should respond to without feeling insulted.
At the risk of breaking your sig line rule #4,No need to clarify anything, i understood you perfectly. First off, i'm in agreement with you on the "high volume provider" aspect of your concern. If a girl is too popular, you might want to wait until things slow down for her before even trying to book her so as to avoid the "take a number" approach. I get that. And since i was in agreement, i didn't see the need to say anything. I only entered the discussion when it was brought up that having a lot of reviews makes the girl a risk somehow. That, i don't get. I may have phrased my original post poorly, and maybe some of my meaning was a bit more generic than simply addressing the risk factors brought up, but as i said, i understood you perfectly.
I guess I need to clarify my question/statement. I will write this in English this time. Originally Posted by internet_inventor2
I thought they had a board in New York, guess not. We are here in the pursuit of pussy one way or the other. How about you?Yeah, I have read many reviews that seem to be fake to me. They add things or describe things that arent there/ doesnt happen my favorite wasw when they said Miki had manmades, lol. I guess they made hers out of human flesh for that real feel.
The racetrack currently runs ads and they occasionally write reviews for themselves.
It is easy to write a review of a provider who is "overly reviewed", there are so many reviews out there that people tend not to scrutinize the info...and some credibility is gained by the "reviewer". Originally Posted by notanewbie
I thought they had a board in New York, guess not. Originally Posted by notanewbieOuch!
It is easy to write a review of a provider who is "overly reviewed", there are so many reviews out there that people tend not to scrutinize the info...and some credibility is gained by the "reviewer".I don't care to argue this relative to the current discussion, so i'll just concede your point. But what does that have to do with legal crackdowns of any kind?
Okay, blond day #2... we know too many in a short time span, but OPs original question was does too many reviews knock a chick down on your list? My question, how many is too many. A new girl comes, or comes back, one person does a review,and you'll see two or three others jump the bandwagon and review too. All glowing. Then next thing you know,here one comes the opposite no recommend because she's "cold", wack ass handjob, whatever.Honestly, it really just depends on the provider and the reviews. I couldn't set a benchmark in my mind that would apply to everyone. For some ladies, 1 is waaaaay too many reviews. For others, 20 isn't enough. For the most part, one negative review won't hurt an honest provider with an already good reputation. A series of them might raise some eyebrows.
Your thoughts? Originally Posted by luxury daphne
