Hillary broke no secrecy laws

Actually I like the title that Timmie chose. "...broke no SECRECY laws...". Yep, that says everything you need to know about what goes on inside Timmie's mind...unless he was repeating what he was told to say. You have to notice that he did not write that Hillary broke NO laws, no, he wrote that Hillary broke no SECRECY laws. So Hillary has broken some laws and Timmie knows inside his own mind. What laws? Regulations, orders, directives. Hillary while working for the State Department used a long time Clinton staffer to funnel cash into the Clinton Global Initative using the promise of State Department assistance. Money came in from various countries including some very bad characters. Of course, that money went to charity, the Clinton's favorite charity, themselves. I do believe that Hillary broke secrecy laws (you can't transmit spy satellite intell) and she broke many other laws involving her time as the SOS. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I'll keep this short since I could be doing something more useful than pointing out, once again, how stupid you are...

"Experts in government secrecy law see almost no possibility of criminal action against Hillary Clinton or her top aides in connection with now-classified information sent over unsecure email while she was secretary of state, based on the public evidence thus far."

Get it now, admiral? Experts believe no criminal conduct attaches to her actions. The translation for you and the rest of the short-bus crowd is that no laws were violated.

Fuck off back to the janitor's closet now.

You have no proof for the highlighted portion. Let's stick to what we can prove. I know you want it to be true with all your heart, but that's not going to make it so. Originally Posted by WombRaider

OH! You haven't heard the news today have you? Don't want to spoil it for you. Look under Schweizer (sp).

I'll keep this short since I could be doing something more useful than pointing out, once again, how stupid you are...

"Experts in government secrecy law see almost no possibility of criminal action against Hillary Clinton or her top aides in connection with now-classified information sent over unsecure email while she was secretary of state, based on the public evidence thus far."

Get it now, admiral? Experts believe no criminal conduct attaches to her actions. The translation for you and the rest of the short-bus crowd is that no laws were violated.

Fuck off back to the janitor's closet now. Originally Posted by timpage

Wow! You made the letters really big and then you put quote marks around them. I am convinced now. Wow!

[QUOTE=WombRaider;1057143954]You know, he came with a reasoned response and you're still a fucking asshole. Having her own server was not against the rules.[/QUOTE

Actually it is against the rules. Hillary signed off on those rules when she became the SOS.

All pipe dreams.

Still waiting for the FBI's report. That's the definitive one.

Will she use the regular phone or the red phone when Bill gets caught porking one of her aides?

OH! You haven't heard the news today have you? Don't want to spoil it for you. Look under Schweizer (sp). Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

This? He said the same thing two months ago. Someone saying something isn't proof.

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/...dept-business/

Interesting to see how the rats escape a sinking ship.

I know how the government work... i dealt with them for many years when i was fishing ... a bunch of worthless suit that are guarantee a pay check and health insurance that all they good for... nothing new there ... biggest lecher of tax payer money ... always trying to steal money and cover it up ... why you think they have lawyer writing all the laws LOOP hole

So there is just the whole Contempt of Congress, obstruction of justice, and tampering with evidence stuff to deal with. Not to mention still needing to look into influence peddling which the Justice Dept doesn't even have the balls to investigate. Destroying her server had nothing to do with needing to cover up the fact that she mishandled classified information. She didn't want anyone seeing the evidence of shaking down companies and foreign leaders for cold hard cash.

Tim, you really need to accept that the Queen is never going to have that coronation. Your choices this election will be between a clown and a socialist. The criminal's ship has already sunk.

Will she use the regular phone or the red phone when Bill gets caught porking one of her aides? Originally Posted by Brot

ROFL!!

she has a special phone for that, it's called the neutered phone.


she'll "fix" that tomcat.

[QUOTE=JD Barleycorn;1057144070]

You know, he came with a reasoned response and you're still a fucking asshole. Having her own server was not against the rules.[/QUOTE

Actually it is against the rules. Hillary signed off on those rules when she became the SOS. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Bullshit. Prove it. State knew about the server...

So there is just the whole Contempt of Congress, obstruction of justice, and tampering with evidence stuff to deal with. Not to mention still needing to look into influence peddling which the Justice Dept doesn't even have the balls to investigate. Destroying her server had nothing to do with needing to cover up the fact that she mishandled classified information. She didn't want anyone seeing the evidence of shaking down companies and foreign leaders for cold hard cash.

Tim, you really need to accept that the Queen is never going to have that coronation. Your choices this election will be between a clown and a socialist. The criminal's ship has already sunk. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh

Sanders will not win the nomination. And you have no proof of any of the rest of what you listed.

And Bill didn't have sex with that woman.

Sanders will not win the nomination. And you have no proof of any of the rest of what you listed. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Uh, Womb, her emails were subpoenaed by Congress. She ignored the subpoena, then announced that she had the server on which the emails were stored wiped clean. What part of ignoring a subpoena is not clear to you? That is contempt of Congress. What part of destroying the emails that Congress subpoenaed is not clear to you? That is destroying evidence.

Honestly I'm amazed that you fools are actually arguing over whether she will face any criminal charges. Of course she won't. They could end any further investigation this instant, and the evidence to charge her with contempt is right there in plain sight. But she's a Clinton, so no charges will be brought. Simple as that.