Trump becoming more and more isolated

VitaMan's Avatar
Try to post on the topic of this thread. Which is Trump becoming more isolated.
adav8s28's Avatar

But it will matter to many independents and to my admittedly limited knowledge, he still has not gained any favor with the suburbanite women who are smart enough to identify a pig when it oinks. Originally Posted by Lucas McCain
LM, you are right about suburbanite women. They didn't vote for HRC and they didn't vote for Trump either.
  • Tiny
  • 04-28-2024, 07:46 PM
Trump may have more support after the Stormy Daniels/Karen McDougal case is over. I don't imagine Melania, his kids, business associates or cronies want to stand shoulder to shoulder with him on this. If memory serves me correctly, he was banging Stormy and Karen when Melania was pregnant, and during the months thereafter.

His kids showed up for the civil trial in Engoron's court room, but a couple were being sued along with the Donald.

The Justice Department is corrupt and only prosecuting Republicans and not Democrats. Originally Posted by farmstud60
I don't really fault the Justice Department, although the confidential documents case perhaps wasn't necessary. Trump will probably do OK in that one anyway. It's the state of New York, city of New York, and judges and juries of Manhattan that are fucking Trump over without cause. And they're doing that because New York State and Manhattan in particular are overwhelmingly Democratic.
adav8s28's Avatar
Trump will probably do OK in that one anyway. It's the state of New York, city of New York, and judges and juries of Manhattan that are fucking Trump over without cause. And they're doing that because New York State and Manhattan in particular are overwhelmingly Democratic. Originally Posted by Tiny
Hi Tiny, You don't think falsifying business records is against the law? Trump is in trouble with the Stormy Daniels case. The Enquirer CEO is going to testify against Trump.

With Jan 6th I think that was a demonstration that just got out of hand. I don't think Trump told the demonstrators to take a leak on Pelosi's desk or bring a rope and gallows for Mike Pence
txdot-guy's Avatar
I was watching the PBS Newshour on Friday and David Brooks told a story about going to a Donald Trump event back in the 80's or 90's. He described being in a room full of Trump's cronies and his friend commenting to him: Not Indicted, Not Invited.

I thought to myself that is so apt. Donald is a crook. He hangs around with Crooks. Even those who don't start out that way get brought into his crimes and into court. Either as witnesses or co-defendants. When the heat is on where do they go. Not near Donald that's for sure.
  • Tiny
  • 04-28-2024, 09:15 PM
Hi Tiny, You don't think falsifying business records is against the law? Trump is in trouble with the Stormy Daniels case. The Enquirer CEO is going to testify against Trump.

With Jan 6th I think that was a demonstration that just got out of hand. I don't think Trump told the demonstrators to take a leak on Pelosi's desk or bring a rope and gallows for Mike Pence Originally Posted by adav8s28
Adav8s28, When you've got to take a leak, you've got to take a leak.

Just kidding. It's a Republican thing, so it's going to be hard for you to understand. It's why Trump asked those two hookers to urinate on that bed in the Moscow hotel room that Barrack Obama slept in.

Seriously, there's meat behind the Washington D.C. and Fulton County, Georgia cases. Trump was trying to steal an election. The Stormy Daniels claim is plain stupid. The idea that paying Stormy Daniels off was a campaign contribution is laughable. The payment to Karen McDougal is a little less laughable, given that Trump never got around to paying the National Enquirer back. But it's still a stretch calling that a campaign contribution. If memory serves me correctly, a crooked foreigner, James Riady, made actual illegal campaign contributions to the Democratic Party and Bill Clinton of around $1 million, back when a million was real money, and and there weren't any repercussions for either.
texassapper's Avatar
LM, you are right about suburbanite women. They didn't vote for HRC and they didn't vote for Trump either. Originally Posted by adav8s28
Yeah, but suburban women will vote for Trump this time because the lack of border enforcement is driving crime rates through the roof... despite media claims to the opposite.

All you have to do is take a look at Nextdoor at all of the apartment complex burglaries, shootings, murders... People are getting scared... and with the rioting that the Left will instigate this summer because it's an election year, those foolish suburban women will vote for law and order...

And if as I expect there is a mass terror attack this summer, it's a done deal.

My personal bet is a dirty bomb at a sporting event... as the Feds were practicing for that only a month or two ago in NJ.