I... a lady who runs $150 specials knowing she is doing 6-8 per day VS.
Originally Posted by 34E Whitney Weston
This is a rash assumption. Running specials doesn't equal wall-to-wall cock. Nor does having "extended dates" equal "low volume." That's just poor logic.
It just appears as if you are rate-bashing (because low rate = more customers in your argument), vs. the real question: "Do guys prefer low volume."
Well...that one seems pretty obvious. I'm pretty sure most guys would say yes. "low volume is better" is a general feeling from most.
Same with the "I wanna be first, but I don't care how many yards of cock she has in a day."
Both are kinda silly, and very dependent on thinking about who ELSE she is seeing, instead of YOU. That's a recipe for disappointment.
Bottom line: if a hobbyist is focused on how many guys a lady is fucking...he's ALREADY behind the enjoyment curve, IMO.
It's not your problem. Rate the service and stop trying to get your head into her business model. You don't care. And if you do...STOP.
Are guys looking for a quick impersonnal meet or a memorable time?
Originally Posted by 34E Whitney Weston
This is also a BIG generalization. Pretty sure ALL guys want a "memorable time." I'm 99% sure no one wants an "impersonal meet." BUT many just want to fuck and leave. That's plenty memorable for some. Some want a lengthy time to relax and play and banter, and more. WALDT. Why bash those that want to fuck and leave if that's their gig? It's just as silly as the guys throwing $80 quickies bashing guys that spend $400 or more on multi-hour sessions.
"More time" doesn't equal "better time." How the time is spent, and how the individuals connect is far more important than the amount of time on the clock, IMO. I've had great fun quickies, and extended night dates. Time didn't determine the memory or enjoyment. There was more to it than that.