SUSSMAN FOUND NOT GUILTY!!

Lol n omg n wtf whaco...really...if it had gone the other way???

Dah...fucking clueless morons

You sound like a mechanical parrot slowly winding down... Originally Posted by WTF

... Still laughing, mate...

YOU know what the truth is...

The best part - for me - is watching some o' you lads
surely put the badmouth on nations such-as Russia,
and Iran, and Cuba and say THEY got corrupt governments.

#### Salty

i was not surprised by the guilty verdict.

you had a a tainted and biased judge who should have recused.

4 jurors with ties to hillary and obama should not have been seated and were were allowed by the biased judge to be part of the jury despite Durham's objections.

and the jury make up is of 95% of the DC population who voted against Trump. this was a hostile biased jury.

trial shouldn't be held in DC given its political undertones.

i was not surprised by the guilty verdict.

you had a a tainted and biased judge who should have recused.

4 jurors with ties to hillary and obama should not have been seated and were were allowed by the biased judge to be part of the jury despite Durham's objections.

and the jury make up is of 95% of the DC population who voted against Trump. this was a hostile biased jury.

trial shouldn't be held in DC given its political undertones. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

It was a not guilty verdict and are you admitting that Durham should not have brought this case forward?

dilbert...if you'd read the law on this and read the testimony....you'd have known he wasn't going to be convicted.

The lie has to have materially effected the case. So you think the FBI FBI would not have investigated the information if they'd known Sussman was working for Clinton? That would dereliction of duty NOT to check it out.

So they were going to check it out no matter what....which means the lie by omission was not material.

Michael Flynn was bad enough. This case was perhaps even stupider. You’re going to prosecute someone just for not saying he’s connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign?

Somebody needs to get a grip on these prosecutors. They need to realize if they put all the taxpayers in jail there won’t be anyone left to pay their salaries.

You’re going to prosecute someone just for not saying he’s connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign?
Originally Posted by Tiny

it was not for not saying

it was for saying he was not

one is an omission

the other is a commission

it was not for not saying

it was for saying he was not

one is an omission

the other is a commission Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

But it is not against the law if it bears no material matter to the case.

Flynn lied to the FBI about his communications with Russian. They were going to close the case. That is material to the investigation. Which makes it a crime.

Sussman case was that they would still have investigated the matter no matter if they knew or not he was connected to the campaign.

How fucking hard is this to understand?