"Je Suis Nigeria"?

You got emoticons on the brain chicken dick? Do you sit in your parents basement and pull on your acorn when you see one? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You've already demonstrated how you believe emoticons are superior to your brain, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp.

Typical IBIdiot thread. Start stupid. Hijack topic. Random, often unrelated bullshit interjected by SLOBBRIN, LLIdiot or IBHomo. Move into hysterical shouting match with one or two ECCIE members.

This thread is progressing faster than usual.

It's notable that you and none of your ilk started a thread on this atrocity...
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

None of yours did either, IBIdiot.

Amnesty International is saying 2,000 were killed last week in a single town by
BoKo Haram............

Almost 9/11 numbers...............

But Obama thinks there is no Islamic Extremism; just unjustified violence. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Yes, I would like to see him address this atrocity, as well.
I agree with the idea that not all Muslims are extremists, and I'm glad to see many condemning the violence. However, I feel like many are quiet not because they are afraid, but because they secretly support it.

None of yours did either, IBIdiot.

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Try again, jackass; you've posted in it several times now, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

Typical IBIdiot thread. Start stupid. Hijack topic. Random, often unrelated bullshit interjected by SLOBBRIN, LLIdiot or IBHomo. Move into hysterical shouting match with one or two ECCIE members.

This thread is progressing faster than usual. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Typical IBIdiot thread. Start stupid. Hijack topic. Random, often unrelated bullshit interjected by SLOBBRIN, LLIdiot or IBHomo. Move into hysterical shouting match with one or two ECCIE members.

This thread is progressing faster than usual. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I agree with you about IBHomo (IvaBiggenHomo)

He does interject BS on a regular basis.

You've already demonstrated how you believe emoticons are superior to your brain, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

A emoticon sends you into a dick beating frenzy chicken dick,,,

I agree with you about IBHomo (IvaBiggenHomo)

He does interject BS on a regular basis. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

Are you two faggots rooming now? Here are some emoticons you can keep for your tug jobs.

Re-read your stupid ass post, Old-THUMPER. Despite your very obvious lie, everyone of your so-called *points* was directed to the OP, Old-THUMPER. You really don't care about sobriety, do you, Old-THUMPER? Lindsay Lohan would be proud of you, Old-THUMPER. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Really? Let us look at this together

Point #1: What is the criteria that should be used for people to feel compelled to comment on a wrong? Directly related to the TOPIC of the original post. Even you can probably see that one.

Point #2: Of course this was a horrific tragedy. But news coverage is really no different than most other things. They cover what is easier to get to (or to copy) more than what is not. They cover what they think will sell. They cover Europe more than Africa or Asia. Directly answered your question.

Point #3: Not saying it is right, but quit acting shocked. Stating my opinion in a very non-hostile way. Isn't that what discussion boards are about? Stating personal opinions?

Point #4: IBHypocrit, do you want a roll call posting everytime YOU think something is comment worthy? What an ass you are. I and others have asked you opinion on many topics and you blow them off if they might be the least bit "uncomfortable" for you. Oh, I know. You are "different" and "special". Actually that is true, just not in the way you want to believe. Originally Posted by Old-T

Finally, yes, I addressed YOU in the 4th of my 4 points. One out of four, as I said. Once again, I am stating simple counting facts, YOU are lying. You have earned every derogatory word I used about you. The sad part is you are not stupid so you KNOW my comments in this paragraph are all true--you are just to filled with rage and hate that you will never admit it. That is far worse than some posters here who don't know any better. They at least have an excuse. You don't.

Yes, I would like to see him address this atrocity, as well.
I agree with the idea that not all Muslims are extremists, and I'm glad to see many condemning the violence. However, I feel like many are quiet not because they are afraid, but because they secretly support it. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

I agree. I think Obama SHOULD address it. Just as I think he should have sent a senior emissary to Paris if he hid not go himself. Listening to secretary Kerry's excuses why we didn't have a cabinet level person there was disappointing and frustrating. Again it shows the current administration does not understand the rules of world politics.

As to your other point, I am sure some do support it and that is why they are quiet. But I am sure some are also afraid--of other muslims and of non-muslims. How many fall into each category I do not know. After decades of terrorism, open condemnation will come more slowly than I would like to see/hear it. But in this case I saw some words on the overnight world ticker from Iran condemning the attacks. That is some progress. Small steps in the right direction are better than steps in the wrong direction.

I was talking with two muslim friends (actually one friend, one acquaintance) of mine. They are extremely angry at the attacks, because they see it as a direct threat to them. One owns a small retail store. He is an exile from Iran when the Shah fell. Very pro American, but he has had his store destroyed twice because he was an "arab". The first time his store was firebombed while he was actually at the WTC on 9/12 as a volunteer paramedic. He sees speaking out vocally as endangering his family from both sides--the muslim extremists, AND those who see all muslims as the enemy. I don't know the right answer for him. I wish I did.

I agree. I think Obama SHOULD address it. Just as I think he should have sent a senior emissary to Paris if he hid not go himself. Listening to secretary Kerry's excuses why we didn't have a cabinet level person there was disappointing and frustrating. Again it shows the current administration does not understand the rules of world politics.

As to your other point, I am sure some do support it and that is why they are quiet. But I am sure some are also afraid--of other muslims and of non-muslims. How many fall into each category I do not know. After decades of terrorism, open condemnation will come more slowly than I would like to see/hear it. But in this case I saw some words on the overnight world ticker from Iran condemning the attacks. That is some progress. Small steps in the right direction are better than steps in the wrong direction.

I was talking with two muslim friends (actually one friend, one acquaintance) of mine. They are extremely angry at the attacks, because they see it as a direct threat to them. One owns a small retail store. He is an exile from Iran when the Shah fell. Very pro American, but he has had his store destroyed twice because he was an "arab". The first time his store was firebombed while he was actually at the WTC on 9/12 as a volunteer paramedic. He sees speaking out vocally as endangering his family from both sides--the muslim extremists, AND those who see all muslims as the enemy. I don't know the right answer for him. I wish I did. Originally Posted by Old-T

I think I can see his dilemma. It is a shame his store was bombed when he is probably a net asset to America, even though he is Arab, because of his hard work and his investment of his capital in his business. I like immigrants that invest money in America, and don't get social welfare.
Some people may not understand he is hated by other Arabs because he worked for the Shah and had to flee for his life, too.
So, the ones that don't speak out against terror because they are afraid, I can live with that. In a way, not praising the attacks is a step in the right direction for some.

Did you see the movie with Ben Kingsley who played an Iranian who was a friend of the Shah, bought the house (delinquent on taxes) from the county, etc. House of Sand and Fog - very interesting movie.

In spite of my empathy for people like him, it is kind of an illustration of why multiculturalism doesn't really offer more benefits than its costs, though this is surely subjective and hard to prove. People just don't intuitively trust other cultures or races, and when times get tough, people stick to those who look like themselves. Too much friction, in my opinion. It is a shame, though, because I love young, pretty, skinny women of all races - but that is the easy thing to do. Living with them long term is much more difficult.

I did see House of Sand and Fog. I agree, a thought provoking movie on many levels.

Perhaps, instead, ArabianGoddess or Little Timmy-tard would like to comment on the 2,000 killed last week in Nigeria by Boko Haram? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

If you look at the wiki post of massacres by Boko Haram they've killed thousands since Michelle tried to twitter shame them into releasing "our girls." Most of "our girls" reportedly have been sold into slavery. This even after Obama sent several hundred U.S. "advisors" and some drones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timelin...cks_in_Nigeria

What is the criteria that should be used for people to feel compelled to comment on a wrong?

Of course this was a horrific tragedy. But news coverage is really no different than most other things. They cover what is easier to get to (or to copy) more than what is not. They cover what they think will sell. They cover Europe more than Africa or Asia.

Not saying it is right, but quit acting shocked.
...... Originally Posted by Old-T

Jeez, 2000 people reported massacred and you're quibbling about it meeting a commentable threshold.

#AfricanLivesMatter

If you look at the wiki post of massacres by Boko Haram they've killed thousands since Michelle tried to twitter shame them into releasing "our girls." Most of "our girls" reportedly have been sold into slavery. This even after Obama sent several hundred U.S. "advisors" and some drones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timelin...cks_in_Nigeria



Jeez, 2000 people reported massacred and you're quibbling about it meeting a commentable threshold.

#AfricanLivesMatter Originally Posted by gnadfly

No, you are missing my point. Not a commentable threshold to be able to post, but a "must comment" threshold in IB's mind. My issue was with his pompous, idiotic comment that people he disagrees with (the usual cast of characters) were somehow wrong/delinquent for not having started the thread already. As if everyone else on the board supported the attract since they had not started the thread.

Really? Let us look at this together

Finally, yes, I addressed YOU in the 4th of my 4 points. One out of four, as I said. Once again, I am stating simple counting facts, YOU are lying. You have earned every derogatory word I used about you. The sad part is you are not stupid so you KNOW my comments in this paragraph are all true--you are just to filled with rage and hate that you will never admit it. That is far worse than some posters here who don't know any better. They at least have an excuse. You don't. Originally Posted by Old-T

Hey, jackass, you just admitted that your every point was directed at the OP, or does your inebriated ass not comprehend who it was that started this thread, Old_THUMPER?

A emoticon sends you into a dick beating frenzy chicken dick,,,

Are you two faggots rooming now? Here are some emoticons you can keep for your tug jobs. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You have more grammar and punctuation errors than you do words, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp.

If you look at the wiki post of massacres by Boko Haram they've killed thousands since Michelle tried to twitter shame them into releasing "our girls." Most of "our girls" reportedly have been sold into slavery. This even after Obama sent several hundred U.S. "advisors" and some drones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timelin...cks_in_Nigeria

Jeez, 2000 people reported massacred and you're quibbling about it meeting a commentable threshold.

#AfricanLivesMatter Originally Posted by gnadfly

"[T]he Council on Foreign Relations has compiled data that links 10,340 violent deaths between November 2013 and November 2014 to Boko Haram–related violence. The conflict has displaced more than 1.5 million people, and with more than 20,000 square miles under its control, Boko Haram–held territory is larger than Switzerland."

http://time.com/3666496/5-facts-that...ia-boko-haram/

And still no comment from Little Timmy-tard or ArabianGoddess.

No, you are missing my point. Not a commentable threshold to be able to post, but a "must comment" threshold in IB's mind. My issue was with his pompous, idiotic comment that people he disagrees with (the usual cast of characters) were somehow wrong/delinquent for not having started the thread already. As if everyone else on the board supported the attract since they had not started the thread. Originally Posted by Old-T

That's your modus operandi you are denigrating, Old-THUMPER. Time and again you've done exactly what you are lyingly accusing me of doing, Old-THUMPER.

The point of this thread was to allow ArabianGoddess and Little Timmy-tard an opportunity to further comment on their previously stated POVs (as expressed in the thread referenced in the OP), Old-THUMPER. It was Little Timmy-tards conjecture that RWWers with *guns* are a greater hazard than Islamic militants, and it was ArabianGoddess' contention that ISIS is an aberration, Old-THUMPER. So you're the one who *missed the point*, Old-THUMPER, and how do they reconcile their previously stated positions with the atrocities of Boko Haram, Old-THUMPER?