Does it cross the line to not agree with the content when you are knowingly putting lives in danger? Originally Posted by ProlongusWhile I may not agree with the content, I don't agree with censorship. The organizer put security in place knowing the content was volatile to some.
Is the threat of violence enough to prohibit any event? One group after another would then use this to censor anything they find disrespectful to their own views. Violence is not the answer. But it would be used to squash the rights of others given the chance.
Knowing that the event was to take place when and where it did, why wasn't there a peaceful protest outside to draw attention to the religious views of those offended?
Garland ISD, who allowed the event, stated that their policy is to not discriminate against either side. Who has the right to draw the arbitrary line of what is and what isn't likely to attract violence?