So those were the dead people who voted for biden! bahahahaLOL!
Now we got the proof ! Originally Posted by winn dixie
- Tiny
- 07-26-2021, 01:24 PM
- reddog1951
- 07-26-2021, 01:42 PM
Once again, failure of the thread starter to be able to read proper English sentence structure and lack of fundamental knowledge of content.
Fortunately. I have 30 years of lab medicine expertise, so I'll try to explain.
It all starts with poor reading comprehension skill and preference to skip over content that doesn't give with the message one wants to hear and further broadcast. The highlighted sentence clearly says detection AND differentiation. The word differentiation is being ignored by the original poster and some subsequent posters. The test referenced tests for both covid and certain influenza viruses at the same time and reports as a positive or negative result for each of the viruses tested for SPECIFIC to the result for each virus in the test panel. This allows a patient to be tested for multiple virus with one nasal swab (if deemed appropriate by the ordering healthcare provider), as opposed to being stabbed multiple times.
This is not at all unusual in laboratory medicine. An example relevant to this board and the porn industry is STD panels. One swab yields highly reliable and specific results (at that point in time) for multiple dreaded diseases through PCR. That is technology at work...real Tech...not High Tech...don't obfuscate the terms.
Fortunately. I have 30 years of lab medicine expertise, so I'll try to explain.
It all starts with poor reading comprehension skill and preference to skip over content that doesn't give with the message one wants to hear and further broadcast. The highlighted sentence clearly says detection AND differentiation. The word differentiation is being ignored by the original poster and some subsequent posters. The test referenced tests for both covid and certain influenza viruses at the same time and reports as a positive or negative result for each of the viruses tested for SPECIFIC to the result for each virus in the test panel. This allows a patient to be tested for multiple virus with one nasal swab (if deemed appropriate by the ordering healthcare provider), as opposed to being stabbed multiple times.
This is not at all unusual in laboratory medicine. An example relevant to this board and the porn industry is STD panels. One swab yields highly reliable and specific results (at that point in time) for multiple dreaded diseases through PCR. That is technology at work...real Tech...not High Tech...don't obfuscate the terms.
- Redhot1960
- 07-26-2021, 01:46 PM
... 16 minutes https://videos.files.wordpress.com/p...-3_mp4_dvd.mp4
- reddog1951
- 07-26-2021, 02:00 PM
TLDR. Better things to do. A concise written reply may be worthy of response.
- texassapper
- 07-26-2021, 02:02 PM
Actually it looks like it's not about the differentiation.. it's that the PCR are giving false positives...
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/w...pcr-test-covid
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/w...pcr-test-covid
- Jacuzzme
- 07-26-2021, 02:05 PM
- Redhot1960
- 07-26-2021, 02:09 PM
- texassapper
- 07-26-2021, 02:20 PM
- reddog1951
- 07-26-2021, 02:28 PM
Sap per. First, topic is about differentiation of results of testing for multiple viruses from one sample. I simply point out that the result for detection of each virus is reported specially and individually. Not "glumped" together as inferred.
Threshold Cycles used to determine at what point a detection is deemed "positive" for covid virus or any other pathogen assayed is an entirely different subject best left to knowledgeable molecular pathologists. It's a trade off between sensitivity and clinical relevance, not necessarily false positive as you present.
Some drug is being advertised on TV as "eliminating/curing/purging" HIV. Fine print defines as undetectable by standard laboratory tests. Even so, no way I'm dipping my wick, covered or not, in that honey pot.
Threshold Cycles used to determine at what point a detection is deemed "positive" for covid virus or any other pathogen assayed is an entirely different subject best left to knowledgeable molecular pathologists. It's a trade off between sensitivity and clinical relevance, not necessarily false positive as you present.
Some drug is being advertised on TV as "eliminating/curing/purging" HIV. Fine print defines as undetectable by standard laboratory tests. Even so, no way I'm dipping my wick, covered or not, in that honey pot.
- Strokey_McDingDong
- 07-26-2021, 04:07 PM
Where did you find that video lol?
- oeb11
- 07-26-2021, 04:10 PM
- oeb11
- 07-26-2021, 04:13 PM
Once again, failure of the thread starter to be able to read proper English sentence structure and lack of fundamental knowledge of content.
Fortunately. I have 30 years of lab medicine expertise, so I'll try to explain.
It all starts with poor reading comprehension skill and preference to skip over content that doesn't give with the message one wants to hear and further broadcast. The highlighted sentence clearly says detection AND differentiation. The word differentiation is being ignored by the original poster and some subsequent posters. The test referenced tests for both covid and certain influenza viruses at the same time and reports as a positive or negative result for each of the viruses tested for SPECIFIC to the result for each virus in the test panel. This allows a patient to be tested for multiple virus with one nasal swab (if deemed appropriate by the ordering healthcare provider), as opposed to being stabbed multiple times.
This is not at all unusual in laboratory medicine. An example relevant to this board and the porn industry is STD panels. One swab yields highly reliable and specific results (at that point in time) for multiple dreaded diseases through PCR. That is technology at work...real Tech...not High Tech...don't obfuscate the terms. Originally Posted by reddog1951
your point would be better made by quoting the posts you criticize.
Allow readers the courtesy of making up their own minds.
I recognize that is anathema to the maoist DPST party - which allows no independent thought or dissent.
Move to China - find Out for Oneself.
- reddog1951
- 07-26-2021, 05:15 PM
Here you go OEB. Details about the combo Covid, Influenza and RSV PCR Combo test offered by Labcorp (one of the large nationals). If you kindly scroll down to view a sample report, you will find that the results for each test are reported discreetly. Not sure how to post a pdf, but I'm pretty sure you can point and click without too much inconvenience. Pretty much all PCR labs offer panels from one specimen, depending on symptomology...it benefits them financially.
- oeb11
- 07-26-2021, 05:22 PM
Can’t help the stupid. The early test only detected Covid and you had to be separately tested for Influenza. Now they want to simplify that and use one test that can detect both so they can effectively treat people whose symptoms may be similar but only has the flu. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
1b1 - referring to people as 'Stupid' is demeaning, inappropriate, yet consistent with the DPST narrative.
that behavior is shameful.
you choose to treat Peoples with no respect - then you deserve the respect You give.
- oeb11
- 07-26-2021, 05:27 PM
Sap per. First, topic is about differentiation of results of testing for multiple viruses from one sample. I simply point out that the result for detection of each virus is reported specially and individually. Not "glumped" together as inferred.
Threshold Cycles used to determine at what point a detection is deemed "positive" for covid virus or any other pathogen assayed is an entirely different subject best left to knowledgeable molecular pathologists. It's a trade off between sensitivity and clinical relevance, not necessarily false positive as you present.
Some drug is being advertised on TV as "eliminating/curing/purging" HIV. Fine print defines as undetectable by standard laboratory tests. Even so, no way I'm dipping my wick, covered or not, in that honey pot. Originally Posted by reddog1951
R - anything on TV' - as you describe 'advertised' - is doubtless a scam. we do not have technology to eliminate/cure//purge HIV - or Wuhan virus.
- and I am not surprised to see opportunists trying to scam teh public.
and scams regarding wuhan virus are also out there.
Thank you for bringing this to forum Attention.