good reason not to get an EV

... "Climate Change" will make the oceans RISE!

... Surely hope and pray OBama's ocean-front propertys are safe!

### Salty

exactly. and that's only the breakeven to build the vehicle. even if you drive one for 20 years
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

GM is stopping battery replacement production for the Spark EV. Car production years were 2013 to 2016. That means if your battery conks out, you have to throw away the car. How many gas powered cars are still on the road 20 years later.....many.


We can't continue to burn fossil fuels forever, just for the fact that there is a finite supply.

...We can't continue to burn fossil fuels forever, just for the fact that there is a finite supply. Originally Posted by VitaMan

Seeing whereas the biological sex construct is deemed as fluid, why do you cling to a mere two constructs of time? Now versus forever. Is there some science we should trust that says fossil fuels and not fossil fuels cannot coexist (as the little Left-tard bumper sticker advocates)?

time....space....coexistence.. ..the continuum....Q




Science.....Carl Sagan

time....space....coexistence.. ..the continuum....Q

Science.....Carl Sagan Originally Posted by VitaMan

carl sagan.... is dead.

Science continues

GM is stopping battery replacement production for the Spark EV. Car production years were 2013 to 2016. That means if your battery conks out, you have to throw away the car. How many gas powered cars are still on the road 20 years later.....many.


We can't continue to burn fossil fuels forever, just for the fact that there is a finite supply. Originally Posted by VitaMan

Why not?

Erection vision, it worse

[/COLOR]
Why not? Originally Posted by Levianon17

Can you clarify that.

[/COLOR]
Why not? Originally Posted by Levianon17

he believes in peak oil which is finite in theory.

Can you clarify that. Originally Posted by VitaMan

I am asking you dummy. You need to clarify your statement.

My statement needs no clarification. Yours does.

My statement needs no clarification. Yours does. Originally Posted by VitaMan

I wasn't making a statement. I was asking a question. You made this statement "We can't continue to burn fossil fuels forever, just for the fact that there is a finite supply. I asked "Why Not". You need clarification for that?

Your question implies the supply is not finite. That is the clarification you need to make. If the supply is finite, your question makes no sense.

Your question implies the supply is not finite. That is the clarification you need to make. If the supply is finite, your question makes no sense. Originally Posted by VitaMan

Ok I'll make it a little easier for ya. Why can't we continue to burn Fossil Fuel regardless of the supply?