THE ISLAMIC MOLE IN HILLARY CLINTON'S CIRCLE ?

How about that she is not an Islamic mole? You fucking idiot. Originally Posted by timpage

Thanks to you timmy. Coming to the USA, soon...http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ack-Harry.html

I don't think you understand the concept of McCarthyism or the final result of the 1950s McCarthy. I also don't think you know the definition of the word "hate". It is just something you throw around when you have nothing else left. You do seem to throw it pretty quickly though. Must not be much in your kilt. Here is the article.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/...isterhood.html

Too bad to paste and too many things to comment on. You may learn something. For a bunch of people who have spasms over another Bush relative I would think you would not want a daughter of the Muslim Sisterhood in your state department but we have already established your hypocrisy haven't we?

The fucking idiot moniker goes to you for not understanding the difference between a fact and an opinion. Your post is just an opinion, not a fact.

Glad to see you don't dispute any of McCarthy's facts; just disagree with an opinion ( an opinion that was never expressed in the McCarthy article)...............

More importantly, it is no surprise that you are ok with someone with this background and close ties to Al Qaeda (and Islamic supremacist) elements to have national security clearances and access to top level policy decisions in our government.

Btw, we don't know if she has/or has not turned over state secrets to our enemies...but, being the anti-America leftie, it is no surprise you tend to want to look the other way.

How about that she is not an Islamic mole? You fucking idiot. Originally Posted by timpage

Try to imagine FDR allowing someone in his department to hire a child of Goebbels, Bormann, Goering, or Hitler. I don't think they would hire a nephew or niece or even a close friend without a lot of oversight.

Whirlaway, what a bulshit you believe in. Your hate for a great religion shows. Hate mongers like you should be on KKK board not ECCIE

Inflammatory words to be sure. "Hate"? If you prefer chocolate over vanilla do you hate? Care to try to explain why Islam is a "great" religion. Try to get past advertising tactics; 4 out of 5 dentists recommend, or the best selling car in the... How about something really factual that demonstrates that Islam is a great religion and not a cult of some sort. How about that hate. I was not aware of a KKK site. How many times have you been there? Yes, Austin....a island of blue in a sea of red. That explains your lack of any real world experience. Bad Boy Fucked UP....good name. Is this my nephew? He lives in Austin and has a real nice girlfriend. They are off visiting her family in Korea right now so we are watching the news, plane crashes and all.

hmm. i thought this thread was about Clinton getting a mole removed from her ass.
carry on.

NO, we've pretty much stop talking about Bill.

The fucking idiot moniker goes to you for not understanding the difference between a fact and an opinion. Your post is just an opinion, not a fact.

Glad to see you don't dispute any of McCarthy's facts; just disagree with an opinion ( an opinion that was never expressed in the McCarthy article)...............

More importantly, it is no surprise that you are ok with someone with this background and close ties to Al Qaeda (and Islamic supremacist) elements to have national security clearances and access to top level policy decisions in our government.

Btw, we don't know if she has/or has not turned over state secrets to our enemies...but, being the anti-America leftie, it is no surprise you tend to want to look the other way. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

It's like arguing with a retarded child. The title of your post contains a lie. Get it? She's not a "mole".....get it? Read it several times so maybe it will sink in to your dimwitted semi-conscious brain.

Here's what your presidential candidate had to say when Michelle Bachmann, Louie Gohmert and several other braindead conservatives floated this nonsense the last go-round....what a surprise that you're aligned with Bachmann and Gohmert.....readily and generally recognized whackos....:

>>>>Describing the accusations against her as “ugly” and “sinister,” Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., came to the defense of Huma Abedin, longtime aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Last week five Republican members of the House of Representatives, including former presidential candidate Michele Bachmann, made claims that Abedin’s family has ties to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood and questioned whether she is part of a nefarious conspiracy to harm the United States by influencing U.S. foreign policy with her high-level position at the State Department.

“The Departments Deputy, Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin, has three family members – her late father, her mother and her brother – connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and /or organizations. Her position affords her routine access to the Secretary and to policy making,” according to the the June 13th letter, signed by Reps. Bachmann, R-Minn., Trent Franks, R-Ariz., Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, Thomas Rooney, R-Fla., and Lynn Westmoreland, R-GA.

The letter was sent to Harold Geisel, the Deputy Inspector General at the Department of State, while similar copies were sent to the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, Defense and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
Read the letter to Giesel here.

The lawmakers point to a report by the Center for Security Policy, a conservative think tank, which makes the allegations about Abedin’s family ties and calls on the Deputy Inspector General of the Department of State to begin an investigation into the possibility that Abedin and other American officials are using their influence to promote the cause of the Muslim Brotherhood within the U.S. government.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., took to the Senate floor today to rip apart his fellow Republicans’ accusations and came to the defense of Abedin, whom he calls a “fine and decent American,” after observing her work as both a long-time aide to Clinton while she was a Senator and as the Secretary of State.

“These sinister accusations rest solely on a few unspecified and unsubstantiated associations of members of Huma’s family, none of which have been shown to harm or threaten the United States in any way,” McCain said. “These attacks have no logic, no basis, and no merit and they need to stop. They need to stop now.”
McCain argued that there is no evidence to back up the claims by the House Republicans.

“To say that the accusations made in both documents are not substantiated by the evidence they offer is to be overly polite and diplomatic about it,” McCain said. “The letter in the report offer not one instance of an action, a decision or a public position that Huma has taken while at the State Department or as a member of then-Senator Clinton’s staff that would lend credence to the charge that she is promoting anti-American activities within our government.”

McCain said that no one, “not least a member of Congress,” should launch such a “degrading attack against fellow Americans on the basis of nothing more than fear of who they are an ignorance of that hey stand for.”

A statement issued after McCain’s speech by Bachmann suggested the letter was being taken out of context. Read it here.

The controversy comes at a time when Abedin’s husband, disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner, may be trying to revamp and clean up his image. After being out of the public eye for over a year following an embarrassing sexting scandal which led to his resignation from Congress, rumors are swirling that Weiner may be planning a bid to succeed Michael Bloomberg as New York City’s mayor.
“It took a lot of work to get to where [we] are today, but I want people to know we’re a normal family,” Abedin told People magazine in an interview this week with her husband.

A press release from Michelle Bachmann’s office immediately followed McCain’s speech.

“The letters my colleagues and I sent on June 13 to the Inspectors General of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice and the Department of State – and the follow up letter I wrote to Rep. Ellison on July 13 – are unfortunately being distorted.”

The letter encouraged “everyone” to read the 6 letters sent to various agencies. They can all be found HERE.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...erhood-scheme/

Timmyboy goes into full retard mode....................with a one year old response to last week's McCarthy story.....but I digress;

What makes Timmy a full bore adult retard (shame him for calling small children "retarded") is that he doesn't understand fact from opinion.

Timmyboy thinks questions are facts (now that is fucking funny)...........he would think the question: Is Obama the most incompetent President ever ? to be a statement of fact rather than an opinion...........fucking idiot tool of the left who is a complete retard (note my use of Timmy's favorite ad hominems, when he can't dispute facts with facts )!

Again, what facts in the McCarthy article are wrong........Now go full bore adult retard Timmyboy.................

It's like arguing with a retarded child. The title of your post contains a lie. Get it? She's not a "mole".....get it? Read it several times so maybe it will sink in to your dimwitted semi-conscious brain.

Here's what your presidential candidate had to say when Michelle Bachmann, Louie Gohmert and several other braindead conservatives floated this nonsense the last go-round....what a surprise that you're aligned with Bachmann and Gohmert.....readily and generally recognized whackos....:

>>>>Describing the accusations against her as “ugly” and “sinister,” Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., came to the defense of Huma Abedin, longtime aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Last week five Republican members of the House of Representatives, including former presidential candidate Michele Bachmann, made claims that Abedin’s family has ties to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood and questioned whether she is part of a nefarious conspiracy to harm the United States by influencing U.S. foreign policy with her high-level position at the State Department.

“The Departments Deputy, Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin, has three family members – her late father, her mother and her brother – connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and /or organizations. Her position affords her routine access to the Secretary and to policy making,” according to the the June 13th letter, signed by Reps. Bachmann, R-Minn., Trent Franks, R-Ariz., Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, Thomas Rooney, R-Fla., and Lynn Westmoreland, R-GA.

The letter was sent to Harold Geisel, the Deputy Inspector General at the Department of State, while similar copies were sent to the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, Defense and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
Read the letter to Giesel here.

The lawmakers point to a report by the Center for Security Policy, a conservative think tank, which makes the allegations about Abedin’s family ties and calls on the Deputy Inspector General of the Department of State to begin an investigation into the possibility that Abedin and other American officials are using their influence to promote the cause of the Muslim Brotherhood within the U.S. government.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., took to the Senate floor today to rip apart his fellow Republicans’ accusations and came to the defense of Abedin, whom he calls a “fine and decent American,” after observing her work as both a long-time aide to Clinton while she was a Senator and as the Secretary of State.

“These sinister accusations rest solely on a few unspecified and unsubstantiated associations of members of Huma’s family, none of which have been shown to harm or threaten the United States in any way,” McCain said. “These attacks have no logic, no basis, and no merit and they need to stop. They need to stop now.”
McCain argued that there is no evidence to back up the claims by the House Republicans.

“To say that the accusations made in both documents are not substantiated by the evidence they offer is to be overly polite and diplomatic about it,” McCain said. “The letter in the report offer not one instance of an action, a decision or a public position that Huma has taken while at the State Department or as a member of then-Senator Clinton’s staff that would lend credence to the charge that she is promoting anti-American activities within our government.”

McCain said that no one, “not least a member of Congress,” should launch such a “degrading attack against fellow Americans on the basis of nothing more than fear of who they are an ignorance of that hey stand for.”

A statement issued after McCain’s speech by Bachmann suggested the letter was being taken out of context. Read it here.

The controversy comes at a time when Abedin’s husband, disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner, may be trying to revamp and clean up his image. After being out of the public eye for over a year following an embarrassing sexting scandal which led to his resignation from Congress, rumors are swirling that Weiner may be planning a bid to succeed Michael Bloomberg as New York City’s mayor.
“It took a lot of work to get to where [we] are today, but I want people to know we’re a normal family,” Abedin told People magazine in an interview this week with her husband.

A press release from Michelle Bachmann’s office immediately followed McCain’s speech.

“The letters my colleagues and I sent on June 13 to the Inspectors General of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice and the Department of State – and the follow up letter I wrote to Rep. Ellison on July 13 – are unfortunately being distorted.”

The letter encouraged “everyone” to read the 6 letters sent to various agencies. They can all be found HERE.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...erhood-scheme/ Originally Posted by timpage

Speaking of full retard, try to wrap your shriveled brain stem around the idea that McCain's response was to the identical smear contained in your McCarthyism article that was published years ago. McCarthy and others have been throwing this shit out there for years and it's been picked up by loonies like Bachmann and Gohmert who have no shame and will say anything (sorta like you) if they think it might benefit them politically with the right-wing droolers (again, like you). McCain was responding to the identical allegations contained in your current post. So, fuck off with your made-up, lying excuse and try to make some attempt to give us a fact....a fact....that this woman is a "mole" as you have stated in your post. Name one thing that she has done that supports that assertion. We'll wait you stupid lying halfwit.

Timmie must be blonde. You see things right in front of you but they don't correspond to your world view. So instead of questioning your world view like a rational person, you question the reality of what you see. This is part of a definition of insanity you know.

Or as Timmy likes to say: full adult retard.............

Timmie must be blonde. You see things right in front of you but they don't correspond to your world view. So instead of questioning your world view like a rational person, you question the reality of what you see. This is part of a definition of insanity you know. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Uh huh. Since you two lames lack the reading comprehension capacity of a goat, I'll cut and paste Senator McCain's comments again....just so you can try to answer the question that has been posed:

>>>To say that the accusations made in both documents are not substantiated by the evidence they offer is to be overly polite and diplomatic about it,” McCain said. “The letter in the report offer not one instance of an action, a decision or a public position that Huma has taken while at the State Department or as a member of then-Senator Clinton’s staff that would lend credence to the charge that she is promoting anti-American activities within our government.”<<<

Now, you two barely-trained chimpanzees who are so good at mimicking everything you read in the right-wing stratosphere, ought to be able to give us a FACT that supports your assertions that Huma is a "mole". And, just to help you two dumbasses out, let's examine the definition of a "mole" from Widipedia, shall we?

>>>In espionage jargon, a mole (also called a penetration agent,[1] deep cover agent, or sleeper agent) is a long-term spy (espionage agent) who is recruited before he has access to secret intelligence, and subsequently works his way into the target organization.[2][3] However it is popularly used to mean any long-term clandestine spy or informant within an organization, whether government or private.<<<

And, just so you have a reference point for your dim-witted imaginations to focus on, here are some examples of "moles" from the past:

>>>A mole may be recruited early in life, and may take decades to get a job in government service and reach a position of access to secret information before he becomes active as a spy. Perhaps the most famous examples of moles are the Cambridge Five, five upper-class British men recruited by the KGB as left-wing students at Cambridge University in the 1930s who later rose to high levels in various parts of the British government.[4] By contrast, most espionage agents, such as CIA Director of Counterintelligence Aldrich Ames and FBI agent Robert Hanssen who spied on the US government for the KGB, are either recruited or offer their services as spies after they are in place as members of the target organization.<<<

Now....tell us again about everything, or even one thing, that this woman has done that even remotely justifies Whirlytard referring to her as a "mole." One specific action, one specific instance....where she has done anything even remotely against the interest of the United States. Her staying with her idiot husband doesn't qualify.

Fucking morons.

Let me try to be clear Ms Page; for the most part we don't care what McCain has to say about much of anything. He may be a hero of Vietnam but his elected career lacks any backbone or commitment to anything except his own press.

And we are not arguing the meaning of a word, we are talking about a possible breach of national security which you seem to want to dismiss.

My I introduce your new avatar Ms. Page;