Is MSNBC Getting Ready To Dump Hillary??

You're under the impression that all republicans support Trump. What conservatives like about Trump is the complete absence of political correctness. He brings a freshness to the political process. He says things that are said all over the country around water coolers and over beers at the local watering hole. I believe that most people are so sick of the political correctness crowd that seeing Trump is refreshing. I don't believe he will be the nominee but if he is I would vote for him over Hillary in a heartbeat. Originally Posted by Budman

I'm under the impression that a large percentage of republicans like Trump, yes. Yes, we know what you like about him. The problem is that most of it is bullshit. What people say around water coolers and over beers is usually bullshit.

I'm under the impression that a large percentage of republicans like Trump, yes. Yes, we know what you like about him. The problem is that most of it is bullshit. What people say around water coolers and over beers is usually bullshit. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Really? So the feelings and beliefs of the working people of this country is bullshit? This is what is wrong in politics today. What the people think is dismissed because the elites know better.

I have watched Morning Joe for years....neither Mika nor Joe like the Clintons. One reason why I like the show. Her father worked for Carter, you think Clinton embraced anything Carter?

So I think you premises is off. Now some of their frequent quest may have gotten on board. Originally Posted by WTF

The Clintons only embrace the Clintons . They don't care about anyone or anything else.


Jim

I do have one question, that has nothing to do with politics really. Why are women who are ambitious and want something, bitches? Why are men, like Donald Trump, praised for their ambition and hunger? Why is she a 'mega bitch' and Trump is not? Originally Posted by WombRaider

We're getting sidetracked. Why do aggressive women get referred to as 'bitches'? This isn't about Hillary or Bill or anything else. It's a separate question. Why do ambitious men like Trump get praised and ambitious women get labeled 'bitches' or 'cunts' or any number of things? Originally Posted by WombRaider

I'm not sidetracked at all. Your original question referenced Trump and Hillary. This thread is about Hillary and her fall from grace at MSNBC. If you want to discuss the bitchiness or lack thereof in general start another thread.

My apologies for calling Hillary a "Megabitch" when "money grubbing lying sack of shit" suites her much better.

My apologies for calling Hillary a "Megabitch" when "money grubbing lying sack of shit" suites her much better. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Yes this Clinton foundation is a joke. That IMHO is at the root of this server controversy. It and every Church should be taxed just like a business. Let the free market decide just how chartable we really are as a society!



.

My apologies for calling Hillary a "Megabitch" when "money grubbing lying, THIEVING, TREASONOUS, sack of shit" suites her much better. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Now it is more accurate.

We're getting sidetracked. Why do aggressive women get referred to as 'bitches'? This isn't about Hillary or Bill or anything else. It's a separate question. Why do ambitious men like Trump get praised and ambitious women get labeled 'bitches' or 'cunts' or any number of things? Originally Posted by WombRaider

Ambitious men get called asshole, ignoramus, slave driver, bastards, crooks, psychopaths, fuckheads, greedy SOB's, etc - you should be smart enough to know that, and not pose a dumb question like you just did.

Yes this Clinton foundation is a joke. That IMHO is at the root of this server controversy. It and every Church should be taxed just like a business. Let the free market decide just how chartable we really are as a society!



. Originally Posted by WTF

I agree - this tax-exempt non profit bullshit needs to go - tax them like any other business, and don't make the donations tax deductible. If you believe in God, give to your church or synagogue or God forbid your mosque, but you don't deserve a tax deduction. Same goes for giving shit to the poor - no deduction.

I do have one question, that has nothing to do with politics really. Why are women who are ambitious and want something, bitches? Why are men, like Donald Trump, praised for their ambition and hunger? Why is she a 'mega bitch' and Trump is not? Originally Posted by WombRaider

So what is the gender appropriate word for a male who is a "bitch"? In the meantime, like Trump told the reporter we know what a bitch is and what it means. We will continue to use that term until you coin the proper word for usage.

Bimbo eruptions was actually used by Clinton? Or was it used by the media? This is an important distinction. I have found no record of her using that phrase. Plenty of references of the media using it though. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Betsy Wright and Hillary Clinton in charge of taking care of "bimbo" eruptions back in the 1990s. This is part of American political history and you are unaware???? Really? According to Jon Gambrell of ABC news, it was Betsy Wright who coined the term while working for the Clintons.

I do have one question, that has nothing to do with politics really. Why are women who are ambitious and want something, bitches? Why are men, like Donald Trump, praised for their ambition and hunger? Why is she a 'mega bitch' and Trump is not? Originally Posted by WombRaider

I don't think that is true. I think she is thought of as a bitch because she is truly a fucking bitch. Acting as if you are above the law and answering any questions regarding such in a condescending way. Bimbo eruptions. She comes across in all interviews as if she is doing us a favor by submitting herself to such questions by the peons. Other candidates actually appear to want to answer questions and realize that doing so is the way to get your viewpoints out there. Originally Posted by Budman

because it's well documented what an imperious bitch she really is. do i have to post links to the many articles from former staffers on that topic? i already have. and you Clinton buttsniffers would still defend her as what? misunderstood? taken out of cuntext? lol

The Clintons only embrace the Clintons . They don't care about anyone or anything else.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

you damn right! and they'll go to any lengths .. any .. to push their agenda and protect their position. including murder. just google Clinton crimes and see how many articles are listed.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=clinton+crimes+

there's an old adage .. "where there's smoke, there's fire" .. in the case of both the Clintons, it's a Forrest fire.

Mena, WhiteWater, it goes on and on.

interestingly, when i searched for bill clinton disbarred ..

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q...nton+disbarred

this link came up. interesting reading!

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2012/09/...ton-and-nixon/


Clinton was not disbarred as we all should know. he surrendered his Law License to avoid disbarment. what i found interesting is that both the Obamas also either let their license either lapse (Moochelle) or "retired" (Hussein). rather odd that yes?

Lost Law Licenses: Presidents Obama, Clinton, and Nixon

By Gary North
September 8, 2012



In my article on the letter I received from a lawyer who insisted – inaccurately – that Michelle Obama let her license to practice law go inactive when her husband surrendered his license in early 2008, I responded: “Did Romney surrender his license? No. Did either of the Clintons surrender theirs? No. Did Nixon surrender his? No.”


I was responding to the argument that it was to be expected that a candidate for the nomination of President would surrender his right to practice law. On the contrary, it had never happened before in American history.


Then I listed people who had not surrendered their licenses: Romney, both Clintons, and Nixon. I thought this point was obvious: I was talking about the nomination. Romney is not President. Neither is Mrs. Clinton.


Nixon surrendered two licenses after he left the White House: California and the Supreme Court. He tried to surrender his third license in New York State. The state Bar’s disciplinary agency disbarred him in July of 1976. It asked him to sign a statement that he was innocent of obstruction of justice. Not wanting to perjure himself, he refused.


Clinton’s situation was similar.



The Wikipedia entry on the legal case of Clinton v. Jones explains.
On April 12, 1999, Wright found Clinton in contempt of court for “intentionally false” testimony in Jones v. Clinton, fined him $90,000, and referred the case to the Arkansas Supreme Court’s Committee on Professional Conduct, as Clinton still possessed a law license in Arkansas.


The Arkansas Supreme Court suspended Clinton’s Arkansas law license in April 2000. On January 19, 2001, Clinton agreed to a five-year suspension and a $25,000 fine in order to avoid disbarment and to end the investigation of Independent Counsel Robert Ray (Starr’s successor). On October 1, 2001, Clinton’s U.S. Supreme Court law license was suspended, with 40 days to contest his disbarment. On November 9, 2001, the last day for Clinton to contest the disbarment, he opted to resign from the Supreme Court Bar, surrendering his license, rather than facing penalties related to disbarment.


So, Nixon escaped disbarment in two instances, but not the third, by surrendering his license. Clinton resigned his Supreme Court license in order to avoid disbarment. He was suspended in Arkansas, but not disbarred.


My points in all this are simple with respect to the Obamas’ licenses to practice law: (1) Michelle Obama went inactive in 1994, despite a Harvard Law School degree, which is very strange, unless she was doing so to avoid a hearing on something; (2) her husband “retired” in January 2008. I am not saying that they were ever formally charged with misconduct. I am saying that the most plausible reason for their having abandoned their licenses was to avoid disciplinary action and the threat of public disbarment. That was what Nixon and Clinton fully understood. My critics do not, or, being lawyers, pretend not to.


Obama’s supporters – several of them lawyers – have sent me emails crying “foul.” I don’t much care. This is not a court of law. This is a court of public opinion.


The Snopes entry does not deal with the problem, namely, providing a plausible explanation for two people walking away from the lifetime income and prestige to be gained by certification by Harvard Law School. Michelle Obama was 29 when she quit (went inactive). The Bar granted her this request when she turned 30.


Let me remind readers of the main point I was making in my original article, namely, that President Obama is not a Marxist, because he does not believe in proletarian revolution. Barack Obama is a Left-wing social climber with a wife who loves to shop. Second, he is under control by his handlers, because they know why he and his wife are no longer allowed to practice law. It was voluntary on their part in the same was that it was voluntary on Nixon’s part and Clinton’s part. If you want to avoid being disbarred, you can retire or else go inactive.


If you want to avoid a hearing on whatever issue a critic has raised with the Bar, the matter will not be raised publicly if you go inactive or retire. It is all informal. You are allowed to depart gracefully. No hard feelings. There is still hope. And there surely has been change.



Gary North [send him mail] is the author of Mises on Money. Visit http://www.garynorth.com. He is also the author of a free 31-volume series, An Economic Commentary on the Bible.

Really? So the feelings and beliefs of the working people of this country is bullshit? This is what is wrong in politics today. What the people think is dismissed because the elites know better. Originally Posted by Budman

Feelings and emotions are two of the worst things to involve when you're making an important decision. It's not about someone else knowing better, but you do love to play the victim.

Ambitious men get called asshole, ignoramus, slave driver, bastards, crooks, psychopaths, fuckheads, greedy SOB's, etc - you should be smart enough to know that, and not pose a dumb question like you just did. Originally Posted by DSK

Never seen them called that on here

Betsy Wright and Hillary Clinton in charge of taking care of "bimbo" eruptions back in the 1990s. This is part of American political history and you are unaware???? Really? According to Jon Gambrell of ABC news, it was Betsy Wright who coined the term while working for the Clintons. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

In 1992 I was 12, so yeah.