First, yes, by allowing a sexual act then asking you to pay for a sexual act is the literal definition of the word entrapment. Go look it up.
There actually are rules for cops to follow. These rules or "laws" as you will, set them apart from the criminal element.
Originally Posted by Wizbull0
Negative ghost rider. The pattern is full.
First, I would invest time in learning what "literal" means. (Here's a hint. It doesn't mean "a practical example of" as you seem to think.)
Second, I would invest time in learning what entrapment means. (Here's another hint. It doesn't mean merely getting set up by the police as you also seem to think. Aww hell, I'll tell ya. There is another prong to the entrapment test, and you're only considering the first prong. The second (most important prong!) is that the police have to convince you to do something that you would have not done without police influence. If you call someone you think is a hooker, you're already fucked. Entrapment will fail because the police didn't "con" you into doing it. And many jurisdictions don't even let you use an entrapment defense.)
Nevertheless, I do recognize that this thread is going to shit fast. That's partially my fault. It started with a legitimate point, and for going on a tangent, I'm sorry. Therefore, I'm humbling bowing out of the remainder of the thread to help right it. I sincerely (all honesty) apologize for my part in hijacking this thread.