Text Messaging!

He's quite correct. You may delete them from your phone, but the message remains forever and with very little effort a hard copy can be obtained by Leo and many agencies. Originally Posted by chelsea simms
This is 100% wrong for MOST text messages unless they are tied to some type of paging system. Companies like Verizon, Sprint, etc. only keep texts a few days to make sure they are delivered. Then it is gone from their system forever. This story provides a good overview and accurate information.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,325805,00.html
If I have seen you several times I will accept texts saying can I come over, but if I haven't seen you before I will need to talk to you before the appointment over the phone.
Text is the best for me too!!
Guest091314's Avatar
i dont mind texts from people i have already seen before, but for 1st time appts i like to hear a voice Originally Posted by Jules Jaguar
+1 I do not mind text, but then for a first time visit, the text will take 30-60 min in what could have been a 10 min phone call LOL

Honestly, I prefer email = )
What the Lady's ask is cool by me, but i wish text was the only way to do it.
Text is wonderful as long as you know who sent the text...lol
Because I have a prepaid phone. It costs 10 cents a minute to talk, it costs me 50 cents per text. I prefer PM, or P411 or email. It helps in the screening process because if I have no idea who you are, calling me or sending a text is useless. I don't "know" it's you sending me that text or calling me. If you send P411 or a PM then I know for sure.

Meg
berkleigh's Avatar
I think its absolutely fucking rude to text for an appointment IF IT THE FIRST INITIAL APPOINTMENT AND I DON'T KNOW WHO YOU ARE.

I prefer to be emailed as well thru p411 or the 2 email addys provided in my sig line.

I had a newbie text me @ 3am the other night. I ripped him a new asshole.
I've become a mega bitch recently because I don't understand why some can't take the time to simply read an ad or instructions....and I won't apologize for my behavior either because I feel its disrespectful.
I wouldn't text a client in the middle of the night knowing his SO might see it

If I've spoke to you and you've been screened then cool fine whatever text away.

It also royally pisses me off when a provider texts me for a reference. EMAIL BITCH!
Most of the time I am presented with a half ass reference that comes thru super late an that's just inappropiate .... buts that's my opinion.
Wow Barkleigh.... I think I found what pushes your buttons! I was suggesting that it may be a better way to make initial contact. If I text you and ask on your availability and rates, I can get that out of the way without having to leave the office and maybe getting no answer if I call. Even worse is when I am called back and have to leave again. I am not suggesting that I never call but want to know if there is in fact any point calling!
SEXTING is my favorite!!!




XOXO,
Italiana Princess
Just curious what kind of smartphone you have. My Blackberry has a delete key that makes a text message go away. And, wouldn't you do this from a hobby phone anyway? Originally Posted by billw1032
If you have one phone from which you send and receive text messages such as "Can I cum by today?" and "Same address?" or you receive one like "C'mon over baby I'm really WET!" then you're wife is my ideal client in a divorce action. See the following:

Such consumer products, known as synchronization tools, generally don’t meet all the needs of a forensic specialist, because they don’t protect the phone data from tampering, which means that the data might not be admissible in court. Tools developed specifically for the examination of evidence don’t make it impossible to tamper with the data, but they make it easy to prove that tampering did or didn’t happen.
They do this by means of a mathematical technique called hash functions. When the forensic software pulls the data from the phone into the computer, it automatically runs a set of mathematical operations on the data, using those operations to generate a series of numbers. Later, if attorneys or judges question the quality of the evidence, the software again runs the operations on the data file and generates a new series of numbers. If the two sets of numbers don’t match exactly, it’s likely the data changed along the way, which would mean its authenticity could be challenged in court.
The data we’ve been talking about so far comes from the phone’s active memory, stored in static RAM chips built into the phone. This active memory contains the user’s contacts, call history, text messages, images, videos, e-mail, and cached Web pages, as well as basic information about the phone needed to connect it to the network. Phones may also have removable memory cards, usually in the MicroSD format. Most forensic tools pull this data as part of the active memory; the card may also be removed from the phone later and read as if it were a flash-based hard drive. For some phones, that’s where the story ends.
But phones built to the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) standard have an additional storage area -- a removable smart card known as the subscriber identity module (SIM). GSM is the most common phone standard outside the United States and is also used by AT&T and T-Mobile USA inside the country. The SIM contains the phone number, along with other authentication and security information that allows the phone to connect to the network. It also acts as a secondary storage bin for contacts, text messages, call history, and other information that the user might want to take with him if he switches to another phone; it’s up to the user whether the phone sends that information to the built-in memory or to the SIM.
The SIM can be a great place to look for evidence, because deleting a text message or contact from the SIM doesn’t necessarily mean that the corresponding data is lost. Instead, it’s simply flagged as deleted, making it no longer accessible to the phone; it doesn’t really disappear until the number of stored messages exceeds the SIM’s capacity, which is typically 20 or 40 messages. Then only the oldest message is pushed out when a new message comes in.
Extracting these hidden messages from the SIM sometimes requires even more software tools. Ideally, a forensic lab would have enough different tools on hand to cover all the cellphone carriers and models sold in its region. But the typical forensics lab can afford only a small proportion of these tools; they’re just too expensive, with prices often in the tens of thousands of dollars. To make the situation even worse, these tools can handle only certain specific sets of data. For any one type of phone, the lab must purchase one piece of software to pull the contacts, call history, and text messages and a second software tool to pull the images, videos, and ringtones. And as a final blow to the lab budget, the tools must be updated frequently to handle new phone models, new versions of phone operating systems, and other technologies.
m5552009's Avatar
I spent 40 years in a sales role servicing my clients. One of the things I learned is to make it EASY for the client to do business with you. That said, I believe a service provider should accept client communication in any way that is easy for the client. Communication should be accepted by phone, email, text, p411, PM, or carrier pigeon if the the client wants to do business that way. Screening by its very nature creates a necessary difficulty. The method of communication should not be restricted, adding additional difficulty to the prospect of doing business and closing the deal. Just my $.02.

m
SEXTING is my favorite!!!




XOXO,
Italiana Princess Originally Posted by ItalianaPrincess

Sexting you is my favorite too!!!
  • T-Can
  • 12-09-2010, 01:17 PM
I never book with a provider that doesn't text. I do, usually, make first initial contact through pm and give out my number. Texting is just so much easier.
I definitely don't mind texting