Donald Trump Vows To Crack Down On Pornography (Yes, Really!)

R.M.'s Avatar
  • R.M.
  • 08-02-2016, 08:16 PM
And the OP has a thread going about Trump being a pervert. Smh
Sissy Chap is a Sock Puppet...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaLbRrhs3DA



Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 08-02-2016, 09:18 PM
Because anyone with a lick of sense know these types of groups use the words "kid" and "children" to help build a case for support. The real target is Porno for adults just as I said.

Try thinking for a change. Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
Several things are completely self-evident in this soap opera:

--Trump is trying to sell out to the Wacko Reps, but likely far too late given his complete lack of tact, political save, manners, or concern for the 99.99999% of the world he sees as his inferiors. I estimate he respects probably 30 people in the US, give or take a couple.

--If he keeps his pledge he will make sure there is a loophole for billionaires

--The RWW moral conservatives do indeed want to close down this site, but IBBraindead and the gang CAN'T acknowledge that Trump is pandering the the anti-free speech crowd. They are so fixated on the 2nd amendment that they can't see (or don't care) about blatant attacks on the others.

--You can never get IB to admit he was wrong, just like he will never actually READ, he will selectively pick-and-choose the words he wants--or if they are not there, he will make them up.

Sadly, as disgusting a candidate as Trump is, if I only had two choices, Trump or Clinton, I would vote for him. He has pissed off the Reps to the point he is unlikely to have the support of Congress no matter which party is in control, and that will minimize the damage he can do. But if Clinton carries a bunch of Dem Wackos in with her the damage will be much worse.

I B Hankering's Avatar
Several things are completely self-evident in this soap opera:

--Trump is trying to sell out to the Wacko Reps, but likely far too late given his complete lack of tact, political save, manners, or concern for the 99.99999% of the world he sees as his inferiors. I estimate he respects probably 30 people in the US, give or take a couple.

--If he keeps his pledge he will make sure there is a loophole for billionaires

--The RWW moral conservatives do indeed want to close down this site, but IBBraindead and the gang CAN'T acknowledge that Trump is pandering the the anti-free speech crowd. They are so fixated on the 2nd amendment that they can't see (or don't care) about blatant attacks on the others.

--You can never get IB to admit he was wrong, just like he will never actually READ, he will selectively pick-and-choose the words he wants--or if they are not there, he will make them up.

Sadly, as disgusting a candidate as Trump is, if I only had two choices, Trump or Clinton, I would vote for him. He has pissed off the Reps to the point he is unlikely to have the support of Congress no matter which party is in control, and that will minimize the damage he can do. But if Clinton carries a bunch of Dem Wackos in with her the damage will be much worse.


Originally Posted by Old-T
Crawl back into your wine bottle, Old-THUMPER. You're WKing for Sissy Chap who is championing no policing of *forbidden subject* .
Several things are completely self-evident in this soap opera:

--Trump is trying to sell out to the Wacko Reps, but likely far too late given his complete lack of tact, political save, manners, or concern for the 99.99999% of the world he sees as his inferiors. I estimate he respects probably 30 people in the US, give or take a couple.

--If he keeps his pledge he will make sure there is a loophole for billionaires

--The RWW moral conservatives do indeed want to close down this site, but IBBraindead and the gang CAN'T acknowledge that Trump is pandering the the anti-free speech crowd. They are so fixated on the 2nd amendment that they can't see (or don't care) about blatant attacks on the others.

--You can never get IB to admit he was wrong, just like he will never actually READ, he will selectively pick-and-choose the words he wants--or if they are not there, he will make them up.

Sadly, as disgusting a candidate as Trump is, if I only had two choices, Trump or Clinton, I would vote for him. He has pissed off the Reps to the point he is unlikely to have the support of Congress no matter which party is in control, and that will minimize the damage he can do. But if Clinton carries a bunch of Dem Wackos in with her the damage will be much worse.

Originally Posted by Old-T
Would that " anti free speech crowd " include all of those DUMBASCRAP state Attorneys General that were pushing to make it illegal to denounce Climate Change Old Thumper ? Or do the lying liberals get a pass from YOU when it comes to restricting ANY amendment to the Constitution?
0ld-Trollop is a 0zombie 0riginal... 0G


Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 08-03-2016, 05:14 AM
Would that " anti free speech crowd " include all of those DUMBASCRAP state Attorneys General that were pushing to make it illegal to denounce Climate Change Old Thumper ? Or do the lying liberals get a pass from YOU when it comes to restricting ANY amendment to the Constitution? Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Another dumb deflection. The topic was "pornography" and free speech. Which, by the way, the LWWs are just as likely to target, and it would be just as wrong. As it is also wrong for censorship of the "the climate isn't changing" nuts. So back to you--have you fallen in goose-step with this latest Trump-ism? Do YOU support closing all vile, anti-American sites such as ECCIE? (My guess is you are fine with closing it so long as they leave the Politics Forum open.)

Good to know you have been hard at work studying under IBDeflection. He would be so proud of you: can't handle the heat in the kitchen, set fire to your neighbor's house.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 08-03-2016, 05:17 AM
Crawl back into your wine bottle, Old-THUMPER. You're WKing for Sissy Chap who is championing no policing of *forbidden subject* .
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Typical IB. Anyone who disagrees with you is clearly a WK. Actually by your standards of insults that is pretty mild.

And typical IB, intentionally only seeing the part of the phrase he wants to see, and pretending the rest doesn't exist.
LexusLover's Avatar

Anyone who disagrees with you is clearly a WK.
Originally Posted by Old-T
Why don't you say something positive about HillaryNoMore?

Speaking of WKing! She needs the help. Her numbers are very bad.
I B Hankering's Avatar

Typical IB. Anyone who disagrees with you is clearly a WK. Actually by your standards of insults that is pretty mild.

And typical IB, intentionally only seeing the part of the phrase he wants to see, and pretending the rest doesn't exist.
Originally Posted by Old-T
Stayed up all night to find the bottoms of a couple of bottles, didn't ya, Old-THUMPER?
LexusLover's Avatar
Why don't you say something positive about HillaryNoMore?

Speaking of WKing! She needs the help. Her numbers are very bad. Originally Posted by LexusLover
She's a "Change Maker"!



She "changed" Old Man Khan's life ..... He shut down his law firm webpage he's so popular!!!!!!!!
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
outlaw porn? I think that porn genie is long gone.
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
He also started another thread about Trump being a pervert ...

..... because he talks about "pussy"!!!!

I thought that was what Eccie was supposed to be about. Talking about pussy! Originally Posted by LexusLover
Clinton Eastwood just talked about pussy but he was talking about the millenial generation. However, he knows pussy. Check out his wives and love interests (what we used to call mistresses).



And Eastwood has a hot daughter as well...

JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Because anyone with a lick of sense know these types of groups use the words "kid" and "children" to help build a case for support. The real target is Porno for adults just as I said.

Try thinking for a change. Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
If you like your porno then you can keep your porno...famous words Nurse Chapel