Kendal Clarkson. What sort of hooker logic is this?

... I let her know that I've seen her before and I'm thinking about seeing her again but I needed to ask her a question. She answered it. Originally Posted by Satoshi

The rest of the original post sems to me fuctardary, but the bolded part caught my attention: what, pray tell, was the million dollar question? (hint: does it rhyme with hare hack or scare sack or rare rack or air ack?

Duh, that was my point Dorthy. The characters we have on an adult site here.

OP, just think of the money you saved yourself.

Just saying.

Why didn't you just tell her what your old number was? Originally Posted by justaphase

All the other posts are correct..but the simplicity of this one is perfect and a very easy obvious solution to a menial issue of confusion..sounds like you came off as one of the guys who likes to get past screening..common M.O. for them is to say they changed their number..hence why she was defensive from the get go... And yah how does a picture prove anything? You know how girls on backpage are called fakes because they use other girls pictures?..same can be done for anybody!! IMO it would have been a HUGE risk for her to feel safe based on a pic you sent because you could have sent a pic of anybody..furthermore ladies are allowed to change rules and/or screening procedures if they so choose...you dont have to see them...but it is our privilege in this hobby..one of few we maintain.

I cant speak for every provider but personally the OP's post rubs me the wrong way and paints him in a distasteful light...

Duh, that was my point Dorthy. The characters we have on an adult site here.

OP, just think of the money you saved yourself.

Just saying. Originally Posted by Passion2015

��

�� Originally Posted by Passion2015

Duh

I really hate threads like this one.

Gent has been here only a year. So maybe he hasn't learned all of the "protocols." Big deal...NOT!

So now he learns from experience.

All of us have been or were or are newbs in some form or other once upon a time.

Perhaps he should have raised the issue in the ML or perhaps just outlined it very gently and asked for some advice. But, he didn't.

Definitely, imo, he could have asked the question w/o identifying the provider.

Oh, well!

But that doesn't keep others from seeing a provider with a snotty attitude.
There are providers that would have handled it in a respectful manner, and there are those who handle it the way this provider did.
As providers are always demanding respect, so do I.
This thread informed me.
Kendal can put me on the DNS list, but it will come after she was added to mine.

But that doesn't keep others from seeing a provider with a snotty attitude.
It's always possible that they don't perceive how they are treated as "snotty". Or more likely, they don't do something to initiate a "snotty" reply.

There are providers that would have handled it in a respectful manner, and there are those who handle it the way this provider did.
As providers are always demanding respect, so do I.
That actually made me snort my coffee. Ranger Rick chastising someone for not being respectful. That may well be the most absurd statement on here in the past year. You were trying to be humorous, were you not?

This thread informed me.
Kendal can put me on the DNS list, but it will come after she was added to mine. Originally Posted by moonshiner

I am sure she is losing sleep over not having the opportunity to be trashed by you.

All the other posts are correct..but the simplicity of this one is perfect and a very easy obvious solution to a menial issue of confusion..sounds like you came off as one of the guys who likes to get past screening..common M.O. for them is to say they changed their number..hence why she was defensive from the get go... And yah how does a picture prove anything? You know how girls on backpage are called fakes because they use other girls pictures?..same can be done for anybody!! IMO it would have been a HUGE risk for her to feel safe based on a pic you sent because you could have sent a pic of anybody..furthermore ladies are allowed to change rules and/or screening procedures if they so choose...you dont have to see them...but it is our privilege in this hobby..one of few we maintain.

I cant speak for every provider but personally the OP's post rubs me the wrong way and paints him in a distasteful light... Originally Posted by gingerpie

Nicely said.

I've had several interactions with Kendal and they have all been very respectful and professional.

What kind of monger logic is this? A guy who favors 15 and 30 minute sessions at low ball prices cops an attitude when he isn't remembered? How insulting.

I seriously question some of you peep's reading comprehension sometimes. Did I ever mention that I tried to schedule? No. I asked her if she was allowing cim now. When she said no, I was done. Did not have any interest in scheduling. This is about her attitude because I didn't want to send a pic. I didn't care whether she remembered me or not because repeat, I never asked to schedule. You guys can go ahead and send pics, but I'm not from a number that I'm asking hookers about rates and menus.

I asked a visiting provider the other day if she has face pics. She said even if she did she wouldn't send them. Understood. Did I call her an idiot? No! White knights are gonna be white knights.

And yah how does a picture prove anything? You know how girls on backpage are called fakes because they use other girls pictures?..same can be done for anybody!! Originally Posted by gingerpie

Do you know how to read? It was Kendal who wanted the pic. It was her who said that she uses pics for screening. Do you people even read threads properly before posting stupid comments?