George Stephanopolis, Journalist, News Pundit.........Clinton Lackey?

You could say the same thing about any talking head on Fox. And your point would be?

Politifact also found your boy Rush's claim to be 'mostly false'. The Clinton Foundation is not a grant-making organization. They don't donate to other charities that then do the work. The work is done by the foundation itself. They do a lot of good work. Perhaps look at someone other than Fox or Rush to find out what they really do. You're never going to hear the whole truth from those sources. They want you to continue to be a boot licker lackey for them.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact...-spends-just-/ Originally Posted by WombRaider

Nice job of deflection and you make yourself look stupid at the same time. There are a few people on Fox that have worked for presidents, Dana Perino comes to mind but she is not an anchor, nor has she said that she is objective, and she has not hidden large monetary deposits to a criminal enterprise.
As for other stupidity on your part:
Grete VanSustern is not a conservative. She worked for CNN and they were all shocked when she came to Fox.
Geraldo Rivera is not a conservative by any means.
Alan Colmes, who contributes, is a card carrying liberal progressive.
Shepard Smith is a liberal.
That last shows that you confuse a news reader like George Step-on-all-of-us with a pundit. O'Reilly and Hannity are pundits, not news readers.

Is anyone who has seen "The War Room" surprised that Step-on-all-of-us is a dyed in the wool liberal progressive with strong ties to the Clintons. People at ABC have even said that his ties were the reason that Skippy got hired.

Nice job of deflection and you make yourself look stupid at the same time. There are a few people on Fox that have worked for presidents, Dana Perino comes to mind but she is not an anchor, nor has she said that she is objective, and she has not hidden large monetary deposits to a criminal enterprise.
As for other stupidity on your part:
Grete VanSustern is not a conservative. She worked for CNN and they were all shocked when she came to Fox.
Geraldo Rivera is not a conservative by any means.
Alan Colmes, who contributes, is a card carrying liberal progressive.
Shepard Smith is a liberal.
That last shows that you confuse a news reader like George Step-on-all-of-us with a pundit. O'Reilly and Hannity are pundits, not news readers.

Is anyone who has seen "The War Room" surprised that Step-on-all-of-us is a dyed in the wool liberal progressive with strong ties to the Clintons. People at ABC have even said that his ties were the reason that Skippy got hired. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

the finer points went over your head, as expected. My overarching point was the water carrying that fox does for the republican party. Do other networks carry water for the democrats? Yes. Just so happens Fox does it for republicans.
I'm well aware of the political leanings of each and every talking head on fox. Sun Tzu said to know your enemy. So I do.

Ahhh.. I forgot.. Hypocrisy is a fundamental part of being a liberal Democrat. Originally Posted by RedLeg505

If you think democrats have the market cornered on hypocrisy, you're just not paying attention. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Where did I say democrats have the market cornered on Hypocrisy? Originally Posted by RedLeg505

Right there, ... Originally Posted by WombRaider

You CLEARLY "put words in his mouth"..... And he DIDN'T POST .. AS YOU POSTED ..

.." democrats have the market cornered on hypocrisy," .............


Just your typical modification of what someone else posts just to pick a fight!!!

I gave up long ago claiming it was your inability to comprehend what you read, and it is overtly intentional as you struggle to be relevant on the board.

as you struggle to be relevant on the board. Originally Posted by LexusLover

LLIdiot says that as if it is some kind of great accomplishment to be "relevant on" a friggin' Hooker "board?"

Yep, that's the way they roll in Idiotville!

Yep, LL's a friggin Idiot!

.....
♦ In 2009 nobody cared when ABC’s George Stephanopoulos participated in daily phone strategy sessions with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.

♦ In 2011 nobody cared when ABC’s George Stephanopoulos oddly questioned Mitt Romney, during a presidential debate, .... Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

The Dem talking point coverage where news organizations get the narrative from DNC conference calls and run with it has been exposed many times. Now the public really doesn't care.

That Stephanopoulos is hosting a presidential debate is outrageous and can't be allowed to happen again by the Republicans. Neither should Candy Crowley types be allowed. The media treating Obama like a rock star is a major factor in his election and re-election.

LLIdiot says that as if it is some kind of great accomplishment to be "relevant on" a friggin' Hooker "board?" Originally Posted by bigtex

You haven't gotten there yet, so at least for you it would be a ...

.."great accomplishment" ... that's why you hang around isn't?

It's certainly not to contribute anything of substance to the discourse.

That Stephanopoulos is hosting a presidential debate is outrageous and can't be allowed to happen again by the Republicans. Neither should Candy Crowley types be allowed. Originally Posted by gnadfly

As long as the "debates" are run by the money there will be ringers.

Yeah it's kinda like how Judith Miller lost all credibility as a journalist only to then end up as a Fox News Contributor.

Anchors, newsmen, journalists....they all have political affiliations, and if you think otherwise, you are obviously too stupid to argue with.

It's your favorite drink, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM, and everyone knew you would be here.



You're the one lying and misrepresenting, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. PolitiFact clearly states its bias for selecting items for analysis, and you're the one who ignored their policy and misrepresented their findings with your lies, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas: Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Reckon his "Dear Mummy" gets tired of him stepping into shit every time he opens his nob polisher and all the shit he tracks into her basement ? Isn't it bad enough the poor old "mummy" has to change his Depends for him at his advanced age, because he's too lazy to do it for himself ? Typical lib...want's someone else to clean up after their mess !

He is not a journalist but he is a mouthpiece for the Clintons. Always has been and always will be.
to think for even a minute that he has ever been anything but a shill for the democratic party is worse than ignorance.

Stephanopoulos should have never moderated presidential debates.

And Joe Klein ended up at MSNBC and Time. Remember, he is the one who knowingly lied about his authorship of Primary Colors.

Yeah it's kinda like how Judith Miller lost all credibility as a journalist only to then end up as a Fox News Contributor.

Anchors, newsmen, journalists....they all have political affiliations, and if you think otherwise, you are obviously too stupid to argue with. Originally Posted by shanm

And Joe Klein ended up at MSNBC and Time. Remember, he is the one who knowingly lied about his authorship of Primary Colors. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

And I'll repeat:

Anchors, newsmen, journalists....they all have political affiliations, and if you think otherwise, you are obviously too stupid to argue with.

^^^

The ole "everybody does it" argument; the reliable fall back for left wingers and moral relativists.

At least we have progressed past "it's bush's fault".

You have any examples of a major media anchor, who has moderated presidential debates, and given generously to the private foundations of sitting politicians?

Do you know of a half-irish, half-predator transsexual that flew a spaceship to the moon? I rest my case.

If you think "anchors" like Bill O'Reilly, Hannity, Chris Wallace aren't biased towards conservatives (as evidenced by their shows, their on-air guests, their dialogue, their presidential interviews) then you are obviously kidding yourself.
If you want to pigeon-hole the argument into only those anchors that moderated presidential debates then I believe you're just a waste of time. Take the stick out of your ass and try again.