You are the very same moron that vehemently argued the Michael Brown case, because you believed the "courts" made the appropriate decision based on the "facts" available to them.
So what changed this time around? Why do you think this was a "politically motivated over-indictment" and the Michael Brown case NOT an "under-indictment" caused by institutional failure?
I'll tell you why. It's because you're a fucking hypocrite. And a huge fucking MORON
Originally Posted by shanm
No idiot because the Michael Brown autopsy was released (or leaked) rather early and it proved Brown was NOT shot in the back. Also the strong armed robbery by Brown video was released. Add in that there was witness testimony and forensic evidence that Brown tried to wrestle Wilson's gun away from him in the police car. All known before the grand jury convened.
You sound angry. Why do you hate the police so much? Why does it enrage you that an innocent white man is walking around free even though his career is ruined?
"What's your point?"
"What's your point?"
blah, blah, blah
"What's your point?"
Is there a single fact in this drivel? I'll save you the "time and unnecessary bandwidth": No. There isn't.
Is anyone surprised that you always (EVERY.SINGLE.FUCKING.TIME) end up on the side of the police and against the (usually black) victims.
I mean Jesus Christ, you gotta wonder about this yourself sometimes.
Originally Posted by shanm
Damn you're angry. Didn't I suggest as a possibility that the police could have viciously slammed the van door on his head causing his injury? But according to you I'm on the side of the police EVERY.SINGLE.FUCKING.TIME? Did I bring up your reading comprehension issue?
My list of points could be facts. I was simply just reporting things the cop in the shadows said. If Freddy turns out to have a large amount of heroin in system then it could possibly change things. How, I don't necessarily know.
I'm glad you used "imply". Because the "implication" started the moment you started this thread. Let's see here
You might think everyone else is as stupid as you or LL but I can assure you, that is definitely not the case.
Your only argument is calling me WTF? You've done that to anyone and everyone since I've been here. This very same line: Are you sure you aren't WTF? You have the same lack of reading comprehension and inability to form logical conclusions as him.
You've used it every single time you can't reply with a logical argument.
And you have the gall to call the other person "stupid"?
Originally Posted by shanm
Again, your inability to draw conclusions "shows" with your accusatory "implications." I've already addressed your reading comprehension. When have you presented a "logical argument?" As LL states, you make shit up...just like WTF.