What happened to the nude congressional woman?

IB started it....maybe he can tell us wtf happened to it.

Maybe in IB's haste to post he forgot to remove the drug references….

Seems like he'd be more careful since he got caught posting Satire from the Onion as fact!



Originally Posted by WTF

Like much else in this world, you remain oblivious to what is real and what is a delusion fabricated in your disturbed mind. The three-some and other affair along with the tattoo featuring a Nazi-era award were the only thing "referenced".

IB started it....maybe he can tell us wtf happened to it. Originally Posted by WTF

Are you still believing it's gone? That's some serious delusional hysteria there.

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2675138

Are you still believing it's gone? That's some serious delusional hysteria there.

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2675138 Originally Posted by eccielover

Thank You kind sir...

Like much else in this world, you remain oblivious to what is real and what is a delusion fabricated in your disturbed mind. The three-some and other affair along with the Nazi-era tattoo were the only thing "referenced". Originally Posted by I B Hankering

So you think she is a Nazi sympathizer?

Actually yes.
Military award for bravery/valor vs the symbol of the Nazi political party. The military cross dates back to early 1800s Prussia.
There's a fair amount of German heritage folks with similar tats.

. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Good Point....that I'm sure will go right over IB's 'The Onion' head.

So you think she is a Nazi sympathizer?



Good Point....that I'm sure will go right over IB's 'The Onion' head.


Originally Posted by WTF

A smart person would quit digging when they find themselves in a hole they can't climb out of. You'd be the clueless liar suggesting someone other than yourself cited the Onion.

A smart person would digging when they find themselves in a hole they can't climb out of. You'd be the clueless liar suggesting someone other than yourself cited the Onion.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Awwww now we are talking....which bogus publication did you cite?

Are you going to lie and say you didn't fall for some BS ?

Are you going to address Unique_Carpenter explanation of the Congresswoman's tattoo or are you going to continue to try and distort?

Do you know what was in the bonk like eccielover seems to know?

I mean you think an avatar with Gorilla nuts is against the rules...surely you know not to post pictures of drug paraphernalia?

Awwww now we are talking....which bogus publication did you cite?

Are you going to lie and say you didn't fall for some BS ?

Are you going to address Unique_Carpenter explanation of the Congresswoman's tattoo or are you going to continue to try and distort?

Do you know what was in the bonk like eccielover seems to know?

I mean you think an avatar with Gorilla nuts is against the rules...surely you know not to post pictures of drug paraphernalia?

Invisible focusable element for fixing accessibility issue Originally Posted by WTF

The Daily Mail is cited in the OP. The stupid-ass liar would be the clown claiming the cited site is the Onion.

Are you insinuating that a dim-retard Congress woman is conspicuously breaking Federal laws? And can you confirm that you were actually there to authenticate such?

The Daily Mail is cited in the OP. The stupid-ass liar would be the clown claiming the cited site is the Onion.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

There was a bumbling idiot that thought BiBi was successfully reelected and started a thread about it.

Was that me or you?

Are you insinuating that a dim-retard Congress woman is conspicuously breaking Federal laws? And can you confirm that you were actually there to authenticate such?
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I'm insinuating that you are posting pictures of drug paraphernalia. A Bong. An eccie no no.

Wrong again LL....I like Judge Judy!
Originally Posted by WTF

You don't even know "Judge Judy"! Hypocrite!

Is making up shit a consequence of your genetic coding?

Or was that learned?

There was a bumbling idiot that thought BiBi was successfully reelected and started a thread about it.

Was that me or you?

I'm insinuating that you are posting pictures of drug paraphernalia. A Bong. An eccie no no. Originally Posted by WTF

Are you accusing a dim-retard Congress woman of conspicuously breaking Federal laws? Can you confirm that you were actually there to authenticate such? To date, your allegations and accusations are without merit without substantive proof. RE: BiBi -- that matter is yet to be resolved one way or the other.

IBH - DPST's do not comprehend concepts such as standards of evidence, proof of guilt, and due process, and the concept of innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

If H.... dictates it to the DPST's - It is their "TRUTH"

wtf likes being pegged up the ass . heck he pays extra for the real thing!!

Are you accusing a dim-retard Congress woman of conspicuously breaking Federal laws? Can you confirm that you were actually there to authenticate such? To date, your allegations and accusations are without merit without substantive proof. RE: BiBi -- that matter is yet to be resolved one way or the other. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I am insinuating that the photo you posted does not meet eccie photo standards...

Topless images, including nipples, and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia. No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc.). Butt cheeks are welcome. Additionally, images where the subject is wearing something below the waist, but still leave genitalia, the anus, or pubic hair partially exposed are not allowed. Clothing that clings to the genital region or clothing that is somewhat transparent is permitted. Common examples of what is not acceptable are nude shower photos where the lady is covered in bubbles or nude pictures of the lady kneeling even where the genital region is concealed, a garment must be worn and visible.

IBH - DPST's do not comprehend concepts such as standards of evidence, proof of guilt, and due process, and the concept of innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

If H.... dictates it to the DPST's - It is their "TRUTH" Originally Posted by oeb11

What part of the violation of eccie photo standas do you not understand?

Topless images, including nipples, and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia. No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc.). Butt cheeks are welcome. Additionally, images where the subject is wearing something below the waist, but still leave genitalia, the anus, or pubic hair partially exposed are not allowed. Clothing that clings to the genital region or clothing that is somewhat transparent is permitted. Common examples of what is not acceptable are nude shower photos where the lady is covered in bubbles or nude pictures of the lady kneeling even where the genital region is concealed, a garment must be worn and visible.