COG true but there's a big difference in saying let's hope he will be a one term President and let's make him a one term President- the operative word is "make" meaning you will do everything in your power to make him look bad- that's putting politics and party over the Country - in other words you are going to do nothing to increase his chances of winning- do you also remember when it was stated that if we pass Obama's jobs bill it's going to ensure him re-election in Nov??? http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63214.html
Do you see the difference????
Originally Posted by wellendowed1911
Yeah, but it is a difference in semantics. Do you think the Democrats didn't do all they could to make Bush a one termer? In fact, both Bushes? The Republicans did all they could to limit Clinton to one term, but Clinton outfoxed them by moving right.
The only difference is that the Republicans are more honest about it this time, and if a Republican is elected, you can be sure that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi will do everything they can to make sure that person is a one termer. Obama isn't being treated differently by the opposing party than any other President has been. Except maybe Washington.
I have an idea. Let's quit electing Democrats or Republicans and see what happens. It's worth a try.