Presidential pardons

Since you sent me a silly, belligerent PM, rather than having the balls to hurl your childish insults in public, I'll repeat here what I wrote to you in private. You deserve it.

Your answer is fine. You're an idiot because you (1) obviously didn't read the entire thread before you posted, and (2) you gave a serious answer to an OBVIOUS troll who wasn't looking for a serious answer. That is, OBVIOUS to anyone with an ounce of common sense. That OBVIOUSLY excludes you.

We are all still waiting on that authority....OBVIOUSLY you have none.
BTW SJ, since you say my answer is "fine," yet you manage to call me and idiot, what does that make you Sir?????

Mokoa where are you? SJ calling me an idiot is a guideline violation last time I read the guidelines. So is disclosing the content of a PM. Oh that's right, violating guidelines is ok when it involves Derogatory remarks directed against DH!!

Before, I thought you were an idiot. Now I'm convinced of it.

How easy is it for sex offenders to get pardoned by the president? Originally Posted by Jeff Epstein

Hang or shoot sex offenders.Stop wasting taxpayers money on the sick twisted f*ucks.What the f***** wrong with the president to allow this in our county

Oh that's right, violating guidelines is ok when it involves Derogatory remarks directed against DH!! Originally Posted by DocHolyday

It's known as The Marshall Plan.

It's known as The Marshall Plan. Originally Posted by CoverMe

Pardon me Cover but maybe that's what it is known to you as. For others its known as prejudice, bias, and blatant hypocrisy displayed on a national forum.

↑ IDJIT

Originally Posted by ShysterJon

Since you sent me a silly, belligerent PM, rather than having the balls to hurl your childish insults in public, I'll repeat here what I wrote to you in private. You deserve it.

Your answer is fine. You're an idiot because you (1) obviously didn't read the entire thread before you posted, and (2) you gave a serious answer to an OBVIOUS troll who wasn't looking for a serious answer. That is, OBVIOUS to anyone with an ounce of common sense. That OBVIOUSLY excludes you. Originally Posted by ShysterJon

We are all still waiting on that authority....OBVIOUSLY you have none.
BTW SJ, since you say my answer is "fine," yet you manage to call me and idiot, what does that make you Sir?????

Mokoa where are you? SJ calling me an idiot is a guideline violation last time I read the guidelines. So is disclosing the content of a PM. Oh that's right, violating guidelines is ok when it involves Derogatory remarks directed against DH!! Originally Posted by DocHolyday

Before, I thought you were an idiot. Now I'm convinced of it. Originally Posted by ShysterJon

Pardon me Cover but maybe that's what it is known to you as. For others its known as prejudice, bias, and blatant hypocrisy displayed on a national forum. Originally Posted by DocHolyday

A few observations:

1) Calling Doc an "idiot" may, indeed, be a GL #4 violation, but Doc has no way of knowing that SJ was not pointed for calling him an "idiot". I could see SJ checking his points balance, then deciding he could easily afford the two or five (or whatever) points it might cost him for calling Doc an "idiot".

2) Reposting or quoting PMs one receives is prohibited by GL #9, but paraphrases are permitted.

3) I'm not sure that repeatedly calling attention to one's having been called an "idiot" on the interwebz is the wisest tack. (See Streisand Effect.)

... I'm not sure that repeatedly calling attention to one's having been called an "idiot" on the interwebz is the wisest tack. (See Streisand Effect.) Originally Posted by chicagoboy

4 out of 5 popcorns

A few observations:

1) Calling Doc an "idiot" may, indeed, be a GL #4 violation, but Doc has no way of knowing that SJ was not pointed for calling him an "idiot". I could see SJ checking his points balance, then deciding he could easily afford the two or five (or whatever) points it might cost him for calling Doc an "idiot".

2) Reposting or quoting PMs one receives is prohibited by GL #9, but paraphrases are permitted.

3) I'm not sure that repeatedly calling attention to one's having been called an "idiot" on the interwebz is the wisest tack. (See Streisand Effect.) Originally Posted by chicagoboy

"Idiotard", for $400, please Alex?

.

.

Before, I thought you were an idiot. Now I'm convinced of it. Originally Posted by ShysterJon

Epitome of...

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt.

1) Calling Doc an "idiot" may, indeed, be a GL #4 violation, but Doc has no way of knowing that SJ was not pointed for calling him an "idiot". I could see SJ checking his points balance, then deciding he could easily afford the two or five (or whatever) points it might cost him for calling Doc an "idiot".

Originally Posted by chicagoboy

But how can SJ be in violation of GL #4 if Doc is an idiot? That would not be rude but a statement of fact.